Ham pr disasters 38! Ailing king? Or heartless son?

[jeffgoldblum]

Continuing the criticism…still interested, still not bored….

Clearly any attention is better than no attention. Naughty children syndrome.

Theres no scenario where they come out on top. I can’t believe they listen to what anyone says to them.

Honestly don’t think that they plan anything, this was a knee jerk response to being told no publicly, if they actually engaged their brains for a millisecond and thought about things properly they would not be in this position in the first place.

Angela Kelly is apparently releasing a documentary. While I don't like to think of her revealing the Queen's private moments, she will have some interesting angles on tiaragate.

I think she did truly love and respect the Queen, so I don't think she'd say anything too revealing. I enjoyed her book, and would like to hear more about the clothes and the travel.

Her version of tiara-gate would be interesting, though, and that's fair game, since H has already put it out there.

I just watched the T0m Sykes / Andrew Lownie YouTube episode and it really is one of the better ones. Well worth a watch.

Today I am hosting a lunch recognising the contribution of the war time generation to this country, and supporting inter generational learning and resilience.

Aka having Mum over for lunch, DD will be here as well (as usual).

Talking of the clothes, has any one been to the exhibition at Buckingham Palace? My sister had a spare ticket so I went along, and was surprised how interesting it was. And such beautiful stuff from the 40s and 50s, I had major dress envy. We even found one my niece loved, reverse image searched, and may well have sorted the prom dress issue....

All of which I agree with, I didn’t say it was logical. But having seen someone go through AD withdrawal I wouldn’t wish it on anyone.

I’m just musing on this rather strange PR theory that Lownie and Sykes were discussing.
Do we know for sure that Sachs are representing them both as a team/brand? Could they be representing MM but not Harry and he’s left to do his own PR? (which seems to be to double down on being a victim).

How's this for a theory?

When they were pontificating about how they tackled racism at the heart of tbe establishment, commonwealth as empire 2.0 etc they were at the height of their US popularity, because it fed into the US national myths around the UK/independence. They 'won' awards etc

So they are trying to get back to that - 'expose' how awful the UK is, to appeal to the US market?

You don’t need to feel sorry for them. They’re lucky enough to have parents with luxury mansions, all fully staffed, in three separate countries, so they can easily afford top-quality security for them.

Cross it off your worry list! 😀

Wasn’t it all exposed as a web of lies, though? Like most of their nonsense.

I know! It’s frustrating having to buzz off - I get FOMO!

Yes it was - like pretty much everything else they said.

And I’m not listening to any lectures about racism from an American. They should focus their brave crusade on some of the pockets of racism there.

Tom Sykes thinks Charles will cough up for beefed up private security, that it won’t be the taxpayer funded armed security Harry is demanding. He also joked how bad it would look if their RPO pulled a gun on someone outside SoHo house 🙂.

I really don't think their kids are at risk

Inspiring! , thankyou for your service.

I agree, but as a pp said recently, brace yourself for news of a dramatic car chase through the Cotswolds with Meghan in tears and Harry in full indignant mode.

They’ll have to stage something to make it seem we’re interested!

I don't know. The very best thing for KC is getting them out of the UK. HAM want armed security (whatever KC and PW have) or nothing

Well property does tend to be less expensive in Northants.

Of course that will happen but no genuine risk to the kids

Of course it was, but most people don't follow that much detail. They just clock the headlines and accusations. Especially if the accusations fir with their preconceptions.

Quite, I hope KC won’t do anything to encourage them to stay here.

I think Portugal is the perfect place! (No offence intended to that fine country.)

I think Charles should cut them off financially. Give them no funding at all. The selfish overindulged overprivileged ungrateful pair have been handed everything on a platter that ordinary people could only dream of and they have squandered it. They are leeches. Charles at least seems to understand how much their behaviour is annoying uk taxpayers.

In this financial climate, with people struggling to afford to live and feed and house their families and pay their bills, it is incredibly distasteful to see tone deaf entitled leeches constantly demanding money.

It’s just as well they’re so bloody transparent isn’t it?

And his caring paternal side doesn't have to worry about, Tgey won't starve snd Meg is a cockroach, they'll survive