Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Ham pr disasters 38! Ailing king? Or heartless son?

1000 replies

jeffgoldblum · 12/09/2026 23:19

Continuing the criticism…still interested, still not bored….

OP posts:
Thread gallery
26
CotswoldsShitshow · 13/09/2026 10:28

I just wanted to say hi and thank you for the past 9(??!!) threads. It all sped up so quickly after the relocation - I’ve only just finished thread 35 to now realise it’s on 38. It’s the OCD in me and I can’t bear skipping anything.

hope you’re fully mended @jeffgoldblum . I noticed you were missing when some ‘flattered but not interested’ comments were due. Back to read thread 36 from scratch. I’ve enjoyed everyone’s input!

AlwaysRightISwear · 13/09/2026 10:28

H's engagements are not official because he holds no office. They are not public because he is not representing the Crown or state. They are private arrangements of little to no interest to anyone other than those directly involved.

RedTagAlan · 13/09/2026 10:29

OneHundredYearsOfAttitude · 13/09/2026 09:06

It's a bit like Trump, in that news about him has to be increasing extreme to be of any interest to anyone. Generally it triggers a disinterested response of "Oh, really what's he done now?" before moving swiftly onto something else.

I feel that H&M are like this now. They are completely oversaturated in the media and no one really seems to care about anything they do unless it's something very dramatic.
It's a world of their own making though and it could have been so different. The opportunities these two have squandered are mind boggling.

Never has the saying "Snatching defeat from the jaws of victory" been so apt.

Quote "It's a bit like Trump, in that news about him has to be increasing extreme to be of any interest to anyone."

I totally agree with that. But you made me think of another angle. I read a fair amount of the transcripts of what Trump says. And most of it is "sanitized" by the media. What he says, and what is reported are quite far apart, when you add in the words that Trump says that surround the words that are reported. Well... he is mad as a hatter.

I don't think the media are at that stage with the dynamic duo :-)

jeffgoldblum · 13/09/2026 10:29

Outtaxed · 13/09/2026 10:09

I feel sorry for the kids. I hope Harry does get security (at least whatever Liz Truss gets) because the kids are so vulnerable.

However sympathetic I am towards the children who do you expect to pay the additional 5millon per year this would cost the taxpayers?
are you willing to pay for it?

OP posts:
PleasantGreenPorcupine · 13/09/2026 10:32

CotswoldsShitshow · 13/09/2026 10:28

I just wanted to say hi and thank you for the past 9(??!!) threads. It all sped up so quickly after the relocation - I’ve only just finished thread 35 to now realise it’s on 38. It’s the OCD in me and I can’t bear skipping anything.

hope you’re fully mended @jeffgoldblum . I noticed you were missing when some ‘flattered but not interested’ comments were due. Back to read thread 36 from scratch. I’ve enjoyed everyone’s input!

Nice to see you back! 👍🏼

jeffgoldblum · 13/09/2026 10:34

CotswoldsShitshow · 13/09/2026 10:28

I just wanted to say hi and thank you for the past 9(??!!) threads. It all sped up so quickly after the relocation - I’ve only just finished thread 35 to now realise it’s on 38. It’s the OCD in me and I can’t bear skipping anything.

hope you’re fully mended @jeffgoldblum . I noticed you were missing when some ‘flattered but not interested’ comments were due. Back to read thread 36 from scratch. I’ve enjoyed everyone’s input!

I’m fine now many thanks Cotswolds ❤️ , I too share an inability to skip and must start from the beginning and work my way through in the correct order! , unfortunately my memory is a tad foggier than it was once, so often I’ve forgotten what I read at the beginning already 😁

OP posts:
KilkennyCats · 13/09/2026 10:36

be angry, bitter, contrary and objectionable; challenge the authority of the monarchy. In this way, they are creating the next chapter of their brand narrative.
What sort of brand would be created from such chaos? Given that they don’t just want to be notorious, they want to earn big bucks? Who actually pays for pure arseholery?

PleasantGreenPorcupine · 13/09/2026 10:37

KilkennyCats · 13/09/2026 10:36

be angry, bitter, contrary and objectionable; challenge the authority of the monarchy. In this way, they are creating the next chapter of their brand narrative.
What sort of brand would be created from such chaos? Given that they don’t just want to be notorious, they want to earn big bucks? Who actually pays for pure arseholery?

People who wish the UK ill. People who will manipulate a willing fool.

jeffgoldblum · 13/09/2026 10:39

KilkennyCats · 13/09/2026 10:36

be angry, bitter, contrary and objectionable; challenge the authority of the monarchy. In this way, they are creating the next chapter of their brand narrative.
What sort of brand would be created from such chaos? Given that they don’t just want to be notorious, they want to earn big bucks? Who actually pays for pure arseholery?

A R S E ?
asshole
renumeration
spending
experts

OP posts:
fastpen · 13/09/2026 10:40

PleasantGreenPorcupine · 13/09/2026 10:37

People who wish the UK ill. People who will manipulate a willing fool.

MauveLibrary · 13/09/2026 10:48

Outtaxed · 13/09/2026 10:09

I feel sorry for the kids. I hope Harry does get security (at least whatever Liz Truss gets) because the kids are so vulnerable.

I hope they dont get taxpayer funded security. I dont want to pay towards protecting people who dont need protection but want it so they can pretend that they are important.

If they want to pay for private security thats up to them but why the hell should the uk taxpayer be expected to fork out our hard earned money on security for that whinging pair of parasitic grifters. I hope ravec decides to refuse again as they have already done repeatedly.

They are private citizens and ravec has assessed their risk previously as not needing the level of security they want. They only want all the bells and whistles because its what William and his family have and Harry is desperate to look as though he is royal and important.

murasaki · 13/09/2026 10:51

As they're private citizens, their public engagments are only public in as far as they involve interacting with the public. So the same as me going to the corner shop or the pub. Should I announce those too?

Lookatmelookatmedontevenlookatme · 13/09/2026 10:53

If H is genuinely as fearful for his own safety as he sounds he must be living with intolerable levels of anxiety. He’s either on ADs or in withdrawal from them, both mess horrifically with your brain.

And if that is the case, then I feel very sorry for him. But that doesn’t mean he should be given everything he or his wife demands.

StartupRepair · 13/09/2026 10:55

Angela Kelly is apparently releasing a documentary. While I don't like to think of her revealing the Queen's private moments, she will have some interesting angles on tiaragate.

IcedPurple · 13/09/2026 10:57

MrsLeonFarrell · 13/09/2026 08:11

This has been their mistake all along, taking PR advice from people in the US. It must doesn't work when you are trying to fight an institution like the monarchy which is embedded in the cultural and social life of another country. They behave as if this is a PR war of equals whereas in reality it's a gnat fighting a rhino.

I don't think this is at heart a 'PR' problem.

The problem is the substance, or lack thereof. Other than being related to the King, what exactly is their role? What do they DO? As Ever is a damp squib and I expect it to be quietly wound up soon. I'm actually surprised it's lasted this long. Their media deals have expired and won't be renewed. I don't see Meghan getting back into acting. And imo there's zero chance they'll ever be working royals again.

So who are the Sussexes and what do they do? They are both only in their 40s, still relatively young. They need to look for some sort of focus and purpose, because playing faux royal isn't where it's at.

Lookatmelookatmedontevenlookatme · 13/09/2026 10:59

StartupRepair · 13/09/2026 10:55

Angela Kelly is apparently releasing a documentary. While I don't like to think of her revealing the Queen's private moments, she will have some interesting angles on tiaragate.

I don’t think she will. She was fiercely loyal to HMTLQ and I would be surprised if she wrote anything that the Queen wouldn’t have sanctioned. I’ve always expected her to turn up on the cruise circuit as a speaker. I still think she might.

jeffgoldblum · 13/09/2026 11:00

murasaki · 13/09/2026 10:51

As they're private citizens, their public engagments are only public in as far as they involve interacting with the public. So the same as me going to the corner shop or the pub. Should I announce those too?

I think you should! , we all should….my official engagements today are as follows

unpacking and organising household food related enterprises ( putting the shopping away )

transporting and visiting urban centres with my trainees ( taking kids to town)

overseeing sanitation of household and textile products ( cleaning the house and doing laundry)

OP posts:
Fondmemories · 13/09/2026 11:00

MrsLeonFarrell · 13/09/2026 08:11

This has been their mistake all along, taking PR advice from people in the US. It must doesn't work when you are trying to fight an institution like the monarchy which is embedded in the cultural and social life of another country. They behave as if this is a PR war of equals whereas in reality it's a gnat fighting a rhino.

Totally agree

bluegreygreen · 13/09/2026 11:01

If he is genuinely fearful for his own or his family's safety, he could behave in ways that would be more likely to reduce risk. Things to avoid might be:

publishing his itinerary before travel when unnecessary
lots of media hype before travel
rolling down bulletproof windows in cars (more Meghan)
refusing to stay in secure accommodation when offered
ringing strangers' doorbells
ordering takeaway delivery to a friend's house
making public details about his (and others) security arrangements

Starlia · 13/09/2026 11:01

I’ve worked in communications/PR for years, although in-house rather than an agency. So willing to admit I could be wrong.
but.
This would have to be the worst executed PR strategy I have ever seen, or the HAM’s PR agency actually hates them.
There seems to be no objective or purpose, other than creating headlines.
Who is their audience? Who are they trying to win over? Their constant blame shifting and perpetual victimhood will and has turned off audiences from the A list to the general public.
They continually react emotionally with their ‘clap backs’ instead of taking the time to reflect and respond appropriately.
What they’re doing is the very opposite of what you’d want to see in a couple who want to be global ambassadors. They display the very opposite of intelligent, mature, hardworking people of integrity and character.

I truly cannot understand what their PR strategy even is at this point. It’s straight out of the 90s and very poorly executed.

murasaki · 13/09/2026 11:06

jeffgoldblum · 13/09/2026 11:00

I think you should! , we all should….my official engagements today are as follows

unpacking and organising household food related enterprises ( putting the shopping away )

transporting and visiting urban centres with my trainees ( taking kids to town)

overseeing sanitation of household and textile products ( cleaning the house and doing laundry)

What a busy day!

In addition to my previous events, I will be

Discussing local issues with a a focus group (gossiping and moaning in the pub)

Assisting in an animal sanctuary (flea treating the cats)

Bereavement counselling and motivational speaking (calling my friend).

What public citizens we are! I demand my motorcade forthwith.

jeffgoldblum · 13/09/2026 11:13

murasaki · 13/09/2026 11:06

What a busy day!

In addition to my previous events, I will be

Discussing local issues with a a focus group (gossiping and moaning in the pub)

Assisting in an animal sanctuary (flea treating the cats)

Bereavement counselling and motivational speaking (calling my friend).

What public citizens we are! I demand my motorcade forthwith.

Edited

We are! , I think we should split it, seeing as we both have a mixture of in house and public engagements I will send the outriders to you after my urban visit and we can share the security officers between us! , that should cut the costs for the taxpayers.

OP posts:
murasaki · 13/09/2026 11:16

jeffgoldblum · 13/09/2026 11:13

We are! , I think we should split it, seeing as we both have a mixture of in house and public engagements I will send the outriders to you after my urban visit and we can share the security officers between us! , that should cut the costs for the taxpayers.

How very public spirited of us to share! Always thinking of the tax payers, that's us!

PullTheBricksDown · 13/09/2026 11:20

Morning all! I have a series of engagements with coffee and laundry today. #VIP

I'm intrigued by this 'stepping back from the Sandringham agreement' madness. Surely they can't ever expect any money help from Charles again if they do that? Has Ian Wace been so generous that they feel bold enough for that? Or is it all testing the water?

thenightsky · 13/09/2026 11:23

Place marking as I have to go out and there'll be a million more posts when I get back.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.