Please or to access all these features

The royal family

King Charles orders Harry and Meghan to be treated like ordinary citizens

1000 replies

Viviennemary · 07/09/2026 15:50

Apparently an order has gone out from King Charles saying that Harry and Meghan are to be treated like ordinary citizens as they are not working members of the royal family. That's according to the DM so it must be right. The thought of those two being pleased at being ordinary is too much.

I wonder just how low they will keep their profile and if it's to do with them wishing to be involved in charities. I wouldn't be surprised if they try to set up their own mock royal court.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
OneLilacHedgehog · 08/09/2026 17:05

noonames · 08/09/2026 17:02

Oh, you said people only cared about the idea of removing Harry’s titles, not Andrew’s.

Harry hasn’t had any titles removed so what do you mean people wanted the same for Andrew? Andrew (removal) got the exact opposite to Harry (no removal), not the same.

Okay I will spell it out. In the past...

  1. Royalists called for removal of Harry's titles.
  2. Everyone else said, only if you remove Andrew's.

If Harry has similar titles removed to the ones Andrew has removed (and not just ones not removed, but where he has agreed not to use them), then it's all fine.

Most people will not care one bit including me.

IAmATorturedPoet · 08/09/2026 17:06

CoffeeCantata · 08/09/2026 17:02

I haveNEVER seen a single defensive post on MN.

Me neither.
I’m pretty sure I’d remember if I had.

OneLilacHedgehog · 08/09/2026 17:07

Wedgewood · 08/09/2026 17:04

I hope you don't mind me commenting on what you said here even though you weren't replying to me, and I don't expect you to reply.

It seems to me that Meghan at least doesn't care about being a working royal or with giving the impression that she is one. But she wants to be treated as "royalty" in the fairytale sense, and as a stateswoman/political activist in the Hilary Clinton cos play sense, and have the red carpet rolled out and powerful people fawning over her. It's an ego feeding thing. And I don't think she thinks the Sandringham agreement has any bearing on getting this treatment, hence all the faux royal tours. And the sad thing is, they have not really suffered any consequences for all the bad stuff they have said and done while subject to the Sandringham Agreement, so what is stopping them just carrying on with people/countries/organisations foolish enough to still have them? They weren't using (UK) public money money then, and if another country chooses to use tax payers money, which I think happened in Australia, then there's nothing to be done about it, is there?

Being an important person is not synonymous with being royal. Many celebrities have the red carpet rolled out.

IcedPurple · 08/09/2026 17:07

Let's not indulge the Andrew derail, please!

Princessfluffy · 08/09/2026 17:07

I hope H&M will start to respect the privacy of other people’s children and stop being photographed with them at charity events and on their “tours” etc to exploit their images for publicity and to promote their own brand.
Their own children’s faces they protect at great lengths but they don’t give two hoots about the privacy of other children, including disadvantaged children. This seems so deeply and disturbingly exploitative.

OneLilacHedgehog · 08/09/2026 17:08

IAmATorturedPoet · 08/09/2026 17:06

Me neither.
I’m pretty sure I’d remember if I had.

Wow, how can you claim that?
Okay you miiigghtt be technically right, but plenty of comments defending andrew

AprilMizzel · 08/09/2026 17:08

Wedgewood · 08/09/2026 17:04

I hope you don't mind me commenting on what you said here even though you weren't replying to me, and I don't expect you to reply.

It seems to me that Meghan at least doesn't care about being a working royal or with giving the impression that she is one. But she wants to be treated as "royalty" in the fairytale sense, and as a stateswoman/political activist in the Hilary Clinton cos play sense, and have the red carpet rolled out and powerful people fawning over her. It's an ego feeding thing. And I don't think she thinks the Sandringham agreement has any bearing on getting this treatment, hence all the faux royal tours. And the sad thing is, they have not really suffered any consequences for all the bad stuff they have said and done while subject to the Sandringham Agreement, so what is stopping them just carrying on with people/countries/organisations foolish enough to still have them? They weren't using (UK) public money money then, and if another country chooses to use tax payers money, which I think happened in Australia, then there's nothing to be done about it, is there?

I agree Meghan had no idea what being a royal meant but then didn't seem to want to find out either.

I do not know who is funding the faux royal tours - or what can be done about it TBH - I assume Palace had a reason for the recent statement setting out the position - to make it clear where everyone stood and it's clear from reaction I think Harry at least is upset by that.

OneLilacHedgehog · 08/09/2026 17:09

Princessfluffy · 08/09/2026 17:07

I hope H&M will start to respect the privacy of other people’s children and stop being photographed with them at charity events and on their “tours” etc to exploit their images for publicity and to promote their own brand.
Their own children’s faces they protect at great lengths but they don’t give two hoots about the privacy of other children, including disadvantaged children. This seems so deeply and disturbingly exploitative.

I don't think any children should be photographed in public like this. But I am an equal opportunity objector and want the royals to stop doing it as well.

WitlessCheeseEatingPeasant · 08/09/2026 17:09

OneLilacHedgehog · 08/09/2026 17:08

Wow, how can you claim that?
Okay you miiigghtt be technically right, but plenty of comments defending andrew

Zero, zip, nada, none and not seen you on those threads either. Do you post about it?

Gotback · 08/09/2026 17:09

IcedPurple · 08/09/2026 17:07

Let's not indulge the Andrew derail, please!

Edited

But everyone else said...! You don't know them though, they go to a different school.

OneLilacHedgehog · 08/09/2026 17:09

WitlessCheeseEatingPeasant · 08/09/2026 17:09

Zero, zip, nada, none and not seen you on those threads either. Do you post about it?

I haven't posted. Normally avoid royal threads. Will go back to that. But I do read them.

MeetMeOnTheCorner · 08/09/2026 17:10

@Wedgewood I agree. I don’t think Meghan does care. She thinks her title is enough. It’s just a mess really!

WitlessCheeseEatingPeasant · 08/09/2026 17:11

OneLilacHedgehog · 08/09/2026 17:09

I haven't posted. Normally avoid royal threads. Will go back to that. But I do read them.

So you’ve neither defended nor criticized Andrew but choosing to drag him up here?

Wedgewood · 08/09/2026 17:12

OneLilacHedgehog · 08/09/2026 17:07

Being an important person is not synonymous with being royal. Many celebrities have the red carpet rolled out.

Meghan is only important because of the family she married into. She would not be received like this is she hadn't married Harry.

OneLilacHedgehog · 08/09/2026 17:12

WitlessCheeseEatingPeasant · 08/09/2026 17:11

So you’ve neither defended nor criticized Andrew but choosing to drag him up here?

I heavily criticise Andrew elsewhere. Given I work with sex trafficked victims it would be wrong of me not to condemn him

OneLilacHedgehog · 08/09/2026 17:13

Wedgewood · 08/09/2026 17:12

Meghan is only important because of the family she married into. She would not be received like this is she hadn't married Harry.

Like Catherine. I like her, so this is not personal, but they both married into the royal family.
Or Camilla. Before her marriage to Charles the public only knew her name for having an affair with Charles.

IAmATorturedPoet · 08/09/2026 17:14

OneLilacHedgehog · 08/09/2026 17:08

Wow, how can you claim that?
Okay you miiigghtt be technically right, but plenty of comments defending andrew

I haven’t read any.
I’m not sure what else I can say 🤷‍♀️

Anyway, Andrew is a derail so I think best we get back on track.

CoffeeCantata · 08/09/2026 17:14

OneLilacHedgehog · 08/09/2026 17:07

Being an important person is not synonymous with being royal. Many celebrities have the red carpet rolled out.

As long as that difference (between celebrity and official royalty) is clear to everyone. It should be now!

OneLilacHedgehog · 08/09/2026 17:16

CoffeeCantata · 08/09/2026 17:14

As long as that difference (between celebrity and official royalty) is clear to everyone. It should be now!

It always was. And harry and Meghan will carry on doing charity work and getting lots of media coverage.

Wedgewood · 08/09/2026 17:18

AprilMizzel · 08/09/2026 17:08

I agree Meghan had no idea what being a royal meant but then didn't seem to want to find out either.

I do not know who is funding the faux royal tours - or what can be done about it TBH - I assume Palace had a reason for the recent statement setting out the position - to make it clear where everyone stood and it's clear from reaction I think Harry at least is upset by that.

I'm glad the palace has re-issued the statement, if for no other reason than to stop the chatter on whether they were back as working royals. But I do worry about them going rogue and being funded to make mischief by AN Other Moneybags, especially in the Commonwealth. Especially now Harry's hopes of coming back to royal life |(if he had them) have been dashed. He's spiteful, and she just wants adulation and won't care how it affects the UK.

cheezncrackers · 08/09/2026 17:18

Ratherhaveacupofteaandabiscuit · 08/09/2026 16:46

I am wondering what the next H&M move will be now?

Will they push on regardless or will they realise it is finally time to respect boundaries and embrace the life they said they wanted as private citizens?

If they do carry on as normal trampling on their family and the country will KC have no option but to remove their titles?

Will they flounce off again flourishing the published letter as proof of victimhood?

If so, where to try next?

I hear failed royals are very popular in the middle east.

I'm guessing that for now they will continue with their plans, which according to Roya Nikkah on Times Radio this afternoon include a whole host of charity appearances by Harry in the coming weeks. I suspect that he's hoping that lots of people will come out to see him, that his enduring popularity will speak for itself and (cynically) that something will happen to prove to everyone that he needs taxpayer funded security.

damnatiomemoriae · 08/09/2026 17:22

AprilMizzel · 08/09/2026 17:08

I agree Meghan had no idea what being a royal meant but then didn't seem to want to find out either.

I do not know who is funding the faux royal tours - or what can be done about it TBH - I assume Palace had a reason for the recent statement setting out the position - to make it clear where everyone stood and it's clear from reaction I think Harry at least is upset by that.

I don’t suppose much can be done about faux royal tours.

It will be interesting to see how many organisations and indeed countries are willing to host H&M going forward after this clarification.

I wonder if that is why Harry may be upset.

He may have Prince on his birth certificate but that won’t assist with the association or connection with the RF that most would seek.

I suppose only those with a need for a useful idiot would welcome him/them. But how useful is he now? That letter would have limitations to any plans in the pipeline I think.

Wedgewood · 08/09/2026 17:22

OneLilacHedgehog · 08/09/2026 17:13

Like Catherine. I like her, so this is not personal, but they both married into the royal family.
Or Camilla. Before her marriage to Charles the public only knew her name for having an affair with Charles.

Neither Catherine nor Camila behave in any way other than consorts of their husbands doing royal duties to further the interests of the nation they serve. They don't rock up to random countries in their own free time expecting speaking platforms and awards for their own greatness, as Meghan does.

damnatiomemoriae · 08/09/2026 17:27

OneLilacHedgehog · 08/09/2026 17:13

Like Catherine. I like her, so this is not personal, but they both married into the royal family.
Or Camilla. Before her marriage to Charles the public only knew her name for having an affair with Charles.

It is up for debate what M did before she married into the royal family.

I don’t think previous history concerning Catherine or indeed Camilla could ever possibly compare.

smilesy · 08/09/2026 17:29

OneLilacHedgehog · 08/09/2026 17:16

It always was. And harry and Meghan will carry on doing charity work and getting lots of media coverage.

How do you think they will fund their charity work though? Are you not even the least bit suspicious that the letter was issued because there was a misapprehension that public funding would
be used? What is there to be gained by the Sussexes from charity work if no funding is available? Especially as they don’t seem to have done much charity work while they were in the States. What is so different about doing it here other than they thought they could get freebies?

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.