Please or to access all these features

The royal family

PR disasters thread 33

1000 replies

BigWillyLittleTodger · 01/09/2026 08:21

A shiny new thread for September Sussex shenanigans!

OP posts:
Thread gallery
36
HeirNspareBNB · 02/09/2026 11:54

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

LemonDash · 02/09/2026 11:55

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

I'm a years-long MN poster, you can check with MNHQ, I have dyslexia and thinking I'm a troll doesn't make me right. You said there were more famous families there than Harry, and that isn't something you can back up. Suggesting someone is a troll or a derailer is deflecting.

SqueakyDinosaur · 02/09/2026 11:56

I'm always intrigued by the use of cashmere as a perfume note. Cashmere as a fabric smells of whatever it's been washed or stored in. Before that, in its raw form, it smells of goats.

PoppysAunt · 02/09/2026 11:56

LemonDash · 02/09/2026 11:29

I can well imagine there are children in the Cotswalds who are more important politically than H&M's. But that isn't what I and others were specifically talking about, is it.

I was specifically talking about H&M being the most famous parents at this primary school/prep in the the Cotswalds. Not in the 2000s or whenever Madonna's daughter went to school. Not in London where a lot of celebreties children go to school.

There is no way that parents at that school won't know who Harry is. And yes as I will say again, he has a lot of press inches and notoriety partly because of his own actions or wishes. But he is still known.

I cannot believe that there is any family there with more international infamy or name recognition and as @jeffgoldblum @bluegreygreen and @PoppysAunt disagreed, I asked that they suggest another name more famous than Prince Harry with young children. I'm still waiting Grin

Not more famous; more high status, more wealthy, more respected and more private.

PoppysAunt · 02/09/2026 11:57

justcallmemarywhitehouse · 02/09/2026 11:52

William's children DO top them.

Famous though is an interesting word - famous is defined generally in dictionaries as being positively viewed. Meghan and Harry are well known and talked about but are more notorious. There is an unsavoury aspect to them - a suggestion of questionableness. This is based on their own conduct.

Yes. Not the kind of fame most people would seek.

PoppysAunt · 02/09/2026 11:59

OliveMyLove · 02/09/2026 11:44

There will be children of other highly accomplished people who have enrolled their children in school. We’d hardly know because they don’t all go prancing around wanting attention and contacting The Daily Mail because their father was Sting or their great grandfather was Prime Minister or whatever.

This is the difference.
Do any of us know what school Keir Starmer's children go to?
No. Funny how they've been able to keep that private.

jeffgoldblum · 02/09/2026 11:59

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

I take it you had a hauntingly good wine soaked evening too! Bigwilly! 😁

LemonDash · 02/09/2026 12:00

PoppysAunt · 02/09/2026 11:56

Not more famous; more high status, more wealthy, more respected and more private.

Yes that I agree with, that's likely. But the word we were discussing last night was 'famous'. Thank you for agreeing that isn't the case though.

PoppysAunt · 02/09/2026 12:01

LemonDash · 02/09/2026 12:00

Yes that I agree with, that's likely. But the word we were discussing last night was 'famous'. Thank you for agreeing that isn't the case though.

Not at all. My pleasure.

BigWillyLittleTodger · 02/09/2026 12:02

jeffgoldblum · 02/09/2026 11:59

I take it you had a hauntingly good wine soaked evening too! Bigwilly! 😁

I prefer spirits myself 🍸

OP posts:
OliveMyLove · 02/09/2026 12:05

PoppysAunt · 02/09/2026 11:59

This is the difference.
Do any of us know what school Keir Starmer's children go to?
No. Funny how they've been able to keep that private.

Famous for being related to someone.

He was known for being the Queen’s grandson. Now known for being the King’s son. Eventually he’ll be the King’s brother.

I assure you if I ask 3 people in outside of UK about either of them it will either be “who?” Or “Oh, King Charles son?” Or maybe they’ll mention Diana.

Not one will be able to name another reason they’ve heard of him.

PoppysAunt · 02/09/2026 12:06

OliveMyLove · 02/09/2026 12:05

Famous for being related to someone.

He was known for being the Queen’s grandson. Now known for being the King’s son. Eventually he’ll be the King’s brother.

I assure you if I ask 3 people in outside of UK about either of them it will either be “who?” Or “Oh, King Charles son?” Or maybe they’ll mention Diana.

Not one will be able to name another reason they’ve heard of him.

That's interesting. It's probably why they are so desperate for publicity, to remain in the public eye, to promote their children.
I think it's a bit sad, really

CoffeeCantata · 02/09/2026 12:06

HeirNspareBNB · 02/09/2026 11:06

Oh, I think I know who he is. A very good actor, but apparently a bit of a twunt IRL. He had to apologise to another actor when A didn’t realise who B’s daughter (C) was when A met C on set.

I know who you mean....but it's not him! I think you mean the chap who came to fame in Withnail?? I like him and my sister sat in front of him at a ballet and said he was lovely with lots of friendly chat for a little girl sitting nearby and a smiley demeanour.

No, the chap I'm on about (I really, really rate him as an actor) is....er...does Wolfie Smith mean anything to you? I don't want to say his name!

taylorandme · 02/09/2026 12:11

LemonDash · 02/09/2026 11:55

I'm a years-long MN poster, you can check with MNHQ, I have dyslexia and thinking I'm a troll doesn't make me right. You said there were more famous families there than Harry, and that isn't something you can back up. Suggesting someone is a troll or a derailer is deflecting.

Of course they can't back it up. 'Famous' families for lack of a better term, will do their utmost for their dc to fly under the radar.

While we know which school Prince George and his siblings attend, it's not really a topic people discuss online because their parents WANT them to fly under the radar, that's the whole idea and a key aspect of security and privacy.

HaM are terrified to not be famous and being talk about. They're happy to use their dc to generate publicity whereas other families don't stoop to that.

Kirschcherries · 02/09/2026 12:13

I understand the points being made about other parents being high status, wealthier etc but @LemonDash is right H&M have generated two media storms in two months and let’s face it which other parents have a series of 32 Mumsnet threads discussing their PR.

Their PR is in your face and as a result human nature means a significant proportion of parents at the school will note A&L and their parents arriving at school. They may not all rush to get an autograph, and will stay aloof etc. but I bet they go home and make a comment. What they won’t do is rush to tell the papers.

Starryfifty · 02/09/2026 12:15

HAM's huge fear is not being in the media. If they are not papped at the school, they will be devastated

LemonDash · 02/09/2026 12:15

taylorandme · 02/09/2026 12:11

Of course they can't back it up. 'Famous' families for lack of a better term, will do their utmost for their dc to fly under the radar.

While we know which school Prince George and his siblings attend, it's not really a topic people discuss online because their parents WANT them to fly under the radar, that's the whole idea and a key aspect of security and privacy.

HaM are terrified to not be famous and being talk about. They're happy to use their dc to generate publicity whereas other families don't stoop to that.

Yes this is true. Originally I asked for names of people who are more well known than Harry, and that's what I meant.

Kirschcherries · 02/09/2026 12:16

Starryfifty · 02/09/2026 12:15

HAM's huge fear is not being in the media. If they are not papped at the school, they will be devastated

I agree I think M is more scared of not being recognised, papped etc than not having security.

Insignificance is a far worse fate.

LemonDash · 02/09/2026 12:16

Can't edit so to add: I meant people who are more well known than Harry who have primary-school aged children.

PoppysAunt · 02/09/2026 12:17

taylorandme · 02/09/2026 12:11

Of course they can't back it up. 'Famous' families for lack of a better term, will do their utmost for their dc to fly under the radar.

While we know which school Prince George and his siblings attend, it's not really a topic people discuss online because their parents WANT them to fly under the radar, that's the whole idea and a key aspect of security and privacy.

HaM are terrified to not be famous and being talk about. They're happy to use their dc to generate publicity whereas other families don't stoop to that.

Yes, that's the point. Their children won't get privacy - not because they're super famous, but because H&M want the headlines, the clicks and the pictures, of themselves and their children.

smilesy · 02/09/2026 12:17

LemonDash · 02/09/2026 12:00

Yes that I agree with, that's likely. But the word we were discussing last night was 'famous'. Thank you for agreeing that isn't the case though.

But why were you discussing the word “famous”. Why focus on that word? It isn’t really relevant to the way that the Sussexes children will be perceived at their school. Do you expect them to be treated differently because they are famous, in a school setting where they may well be other children of “famous” parents, even if less famous in your opinion? If not, why does it matter that they are more famous? 🤷‍♀️

PoppysAunt · 02/09/2026 12:18

Kirschcherries · 02/09/2026 12:16

I agree I think M is more scared of not being recognised, papped etc than not having security.

Insignificance is a far worse fate.

I felt a bit sorry for them at first - I am coming to the conclusion that this must be the case.

HeirNspareBNB · 02/09/2026 12:20

CoffeeCantata · 02/09/2026 12:06

I know who you mean....but it's not him! I think you mean the chap who came to fame in Withnail?? I like him and my sister sat in front of him at a ballet and said he was lovely with lots of friendly chat for a little girl sitting nearby and a smiley demeanour.

No, the chap I'm on about (I really, really rate him as an actor) is....er...does Wolfie Smith mean anything to you? I don't want to say his name!

NO!!!!!! It does and…… NO!!!!

PoppysAunt · 02/09/2026 12:21

The Clooneys are A listers. (On their own merit).
I have no idea what school their children go to. I've no idea if they go to Disneyland or help out in the kitchen or the garden or where they went on holiday or any such detail.
It is totally achievable. H&M do not want to achieve it.

BillyBites · 02/09/2026 12:22

This is absolutely bloody ridiculous. None of this is what the Royal Family SHOULD be about - service and charity and representing our country, acting as soft diplomacy behind Government policy.
What the actual fuck are we doing, giving any column space to this infuriatingly self-absorbed couple in their bid for world domination of the gossip columns?
I mean, can you imagine for one moment, Princess Anne threatening legal action to media outlets or primping and preening at a red carpet event? She arrives in the back seat of a car, gets out briskly and assertively, smiles as she firmly shakes the hand of the welcoming dignitary and then she gets straight inside to carry out the engagement, having thoroughly researched the organisation prior to the event so she can ask relevant and appropriate questions.
THAT'S how it should be done.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.