@notanotheroneagain
I’m just curious why you think this woman has any choice in the matter?
As Harry did not “give her the heads up” that she was being included she was put in a very vulnerable position.
She was a sitting duck waiting until the tabloid press came sniffing.
Would you want your private life & past innocent sexual experiences splashed over the front pages of tabloids, for your friends, family, children, colleagues & employers & general public to see?
His description of her isn’t as anonymous as you claim it is.
The press hadstarted harassing her & she was put into a collaborate with us & control the narrative or be fair game & we’ll go in on you conundrum. They would dig out anyone else she’d ever slept with. Find out if as an “older woman” she ever made a habit of shagging younger men in fields or outdoors if she’s a “kinky seductress”? Pay people from her past to sell photos of her or stalk her friends & family to get “news” they could splash over front pages.
Why is this so difficult for you to understand?
Would you like that to happen to your daughter?
You can like Harry that’s fine & your choice but surely you can see that this woman would very much have preferred to have continued her quiet life in obscurity.
And that it’s highly possible she isn’t even the one he did lose his V to.
Which makes it even worse from Harry - as he’s caused unnecessary harm in her life - so as to prevent & protect maybe the real person from suffering the same.
If she suffers mentally or emotionally from this how is what he’s done here any different to the lack of control he experienced his whole life growing up with press intrusion into his life?
What PP are saying is that unfortunately the abused (Harry as he perceives himself) in this instance has become the abuser.
This is at complete odds with his MO of campaigning for kindness, humanity, feminism & MH awareness.
Please try & see this?