Page 21 | The woman Prince Harry lost his virginity to steps forward

notanotheroneagain · 09/02/2023 13:45

R0ckets · 09/02/2023 12:38

What a non-story.

And yet you felt the need to revive a thread that hadn't been posted on since yesterday just to say it was pointless and that you thought she was lying...

'Revive' a thread from yesterday 😂😂

It was 4 lines down the royal threads !

I also said it would be funny if she was lying. I actually agree with everyone here on the part that hopefully she made a lot of money.

As for the woman, considering that she was not one of the girls pictured with H, she would not be the one harassed. Didn't read the article, but never heard if someone saw them, so how could the press be ready to out her?

GloomyDarkness · 09/02/2023 13:46

This woman totally did not have to out herself.

They wonder off drunk together (after seeing her upset and buying her shots )from their group of friends - he left her and they all knew when she went back to group later- next day she had to go with a friend to field retrieve her belt.

The article say all this and that she was being texted by friends who knew who she was from what he wrote - that would be more than enough for the UK press who as PP say often give people a chance to comment or they run anyway (they did this to my family when a family member was murdered doing their job my family didn't talk they got door steeped for days and press blamed my dead family member for not being clairvoyant and anticipating events)

PissedOffofTiverton1790 · 09/02/2023 13:48

You’re not ever going to be the new Miss Marple, are you?

It’s really not hard to work out how it might have happened...

R0ckets · 09/02/2023 13:48

Didn't read the article

So why comment? Honestly you're making yourself sound like an idiot spouting nonsense about how she outed herself, she's lying and no one knew who she was.

Read the article and you'll understand why she came forward.

notanotheroneagain · 09/02/2023 13:53

'a belt in the field'

That's the excuse to go on a national paper and correct people from thinking it was a middle aged woman, no it was me, a teen!

Please !

GloomyDarkness · 09/02/2023 14:02

notanotheroneagain · 09/02/2023 13:53

'a belt in the field'

That's the excuse to go on a national paper and correct people from thinking it was a middle aged woman, no it was me, a teen!

Please !

If you haven't bother to read the article I really can't see why you are commenting at all.

People that night knew they'd been off together and he wrote enough in his book to ID her to their group and thus the press and confirm what had happened.

Harry himself says his memory isnt reliable at start of his book and many external sources on incidents confirm this. He is the one who brought the incident up again in his 40s and put the press spot light on her - she kept quiet for over 20 years. There are photos of them hanging out at these ages in a group with others - the press has printed these.

I really can't see how you can blame her for all the press interest - seems all Harry generated to me and her making best of unwanted attention.

PissedOffofTiverton1790 · 09/02/2023 14:06

notanotheroneagain · 09/02/2023 13:53

'a belt in the field'

That's the excuse to go on a national paper and correct people from thinking it was a middle aged woman, no it was me, a teen!

Please !

FGS you can’t be serious...

It DOESN’T MATTER WHAT ‘PEOPLE’ (by which I guess you mean the public) THOUGHT...She wasn’t correcting that!! She told her side because the press had discovered and were going to break the story!

It’s really, REALLY not hard to understand.

IcedPurple · 09/02/2023 14:13

Serenster · 09/02/2023 13:36

This woman totally did not have to out herself.

The press was openly trying to track the “mystery woman” down, though. That’s what they do. Hence why Liz Hurley publicly stated it wasn’t her.

And, given the photoshoot and interview that was published, it is walking, talking and quacking like a tabloid blackmail duck. Which, if you didn’t know, is a common technique tabloids use. They tell the subject of the story that they have uncovered that they can either co-operate and give the paper an exclusive, with a friendly piece and nice photos, or they’ll publish anyway with candid photos and no filter on what they say. Plenty of celebrities have spoken about being backed into corners like this.

Isn't it amusing how posters who are normally so cynical about the tabloids, and have a stash of Twitter screenshots of 5 year old tabloid stories ready to attach at any opportunity, are at the same time so willfully naive about said tabloids' behaviour when it suits them?

notanotheroneagain · 09/02/2023 14:46

So the tabloids are all out doing their investigations. So efficient. Can they also tell us how Willy lost his virginity, KM too while they are at it.

The woman is mentioned in 2/3 lines. Vaguely, as you would expect, throw off that she is older (the public were looking at some middle aged woman)

As for the 'tabloids were are about to break' a story on an unknown someone, maybe she could wait till the story breaks, it's not like anyone knows who she is.

Whatever............

ReneBumsWombats · 09/02/2023 14:52

notanotheroneagain · 09/02/2023 14:46

So the tabloids are all out doing their investigations. So efficient. Can they also tell us how Willy lost his virginity, KM too while they are at it.

The woman is mentioned in 2/3 lines. Vaguely, as you would expect, throw off that she is older (the public were looking at some middle aged woman)

As for the 'tabloids were are about to break' a story on an unknown someone, maybe she could wait till the story breaks, it's not like anyone knows who she is.

Whatever............

If she cooperates, they'll put a more positive spin on the story for her and possibly pay her. They'll already have known who she was and be ready to go to print on it.

Whenever you see a MY DRUGS SHAME story or similar, all about how saddened the sleb is but how they've now got the determination to turn things around and they'll come good, etc etc, the press already had the story and was going to run with it anyway. But if the sleb cooperates, they'll get to tell it in their own words and have a more sympathetic slant on it. And possibly get money too.

smilesy · 09/02/2023 14:53

notanotheroneagain · 09/02/2023 14:46

So the tabloids are all out doing their investigations. So efficient. Can they also tell us how Willy lost his virginity, KM too while they are at it.

The woman is mentioned in 2/3 lines. Vaguely, as you would expect, throw off that she is older (the public were looking at some middle aged woman)

As for the 'tabloids were are about to break' a story on an unknown someone, maybe she could wait till the story breaks, it's not like anyone knows who she is.

Whatever............

William and Kate have not written a lurid Jolly Cooper style account of their losing their virginity in a book though, have they? Or taken liberties with someone else’s privacy. Bit like the matron at school. But as long as your hero Harry is telling his story, that’s ok isn’t it 🙄

IcedPurple · 09/02/2023 14:54

notanotheroneagain · 09/02/2023 14:46

So the tabloids are all out doing their investigations. So efficient. Can they also tell us how Willy lost his virginity, KM too while they are at it.

The woman is mentioned in 2/3 lines. Vaguely, as you would expect, throw off that she is older (the public were looking at some middle aged woman)

As for the 'tabloids were are about to break' a story on an unknown someone, maybe she could wait till the story breaks, it's not like anyone knows who she is.

Whatever............

As was pointed out above, it's quite likely that the papers already knew who she was and gave her the choice of giving them an 'exclusive' or having the story put out there anyway without her input. In those circumstances, obviously she's going to choose to take at least some control over her story.

Because when the stakes are this high, doesn't it make sense to hear her story from her?

PissedOffofTiverton1790 · 09/02/2023 14:55

Well yes, ‘whatever’ is certainly a perfectly sound and valid argument.

As I said you’re clearly not au fait with how things work. Which is fine - no one’s obligated to know the ins and outs of tabloid journalism...

She could have waited for the story to break, sure, but then she’d have had to worry and stress over it every day. I’d’ve done exactly the same thing. If I were aware that the press was sniffing around/people in my circle were putting two and two together, I’d’ve wanted to control the resultant narrative too.

KrasiTime · 09/02/2023 14:55

notanotheroneagain · 09/02/2023 13:31

This woman totally did not have to out herself.

She was some side character in Harry's circles that no one would consider. His description was so vague, most people thought he was talking about a really older woman (possibly in her 20s/30s/40s etc).

I don't think anyone generally speculated on her at all. Out of all the people close to him, I doubt anyone thought of her.

Are you on glue??

She was some side character in Harry's circles that no one would consider. how can you write such a thing? You sound vile.

IcedPurple · 09/02/2023 14:56

PissedOffofTiverton1790 · 09/02/2023 14:55

Well yes, ‘whatever’ is certainly a perfectly sound and valid argument.

As I said you’re clearly not au fait with how things work. Which is fine - no one’s obligated to know the ins and outs of tabloid journalism...

She could have waited for the story to break, sure, but then she’d have had to worry and stress over it every day. I’d’ve done exactly the same thing. If I were aware that the press was sniffing around/people in my circle were putting two and two together, I’d’ve wanted to control the resultant narrative too.

Fans of Harry are always so 'proud' of him for 'controlling his narrative'. You hear it again and again from them. But seems they don't feel the same way about a woman who never chose to be publicly involved in any of this.

ReneBumsWombats · 09/02/2023 15:03

The story had so much traction that Elizabeth Hurley had to deny it was her. It may not have had many lines in the book but any mention of Harry losing his virginity to an "older" woman was always going to get a lot of attention.

KrasiTime · 09/02/2023 15:05

IcedPurple · 09/02/2023 14:56

Fans of Harry are always so 'proud' of him for 'controlling his narrative'. You hear it again and again from them. But seems they don't feel the same way about a woman who never chose to be publicly involved in any of this.

Show quote history

Or about Samantha Markle wanting to tell ‘her truth’. Not that I’m buying what she’s selling either tbh.

GloomyDarkness · 09/02/2023 15:05

So the tabloids are all out doing their investigations. So efficient.

They were digging around after the story as sex stories sells UK papers and it does have ring of blackmail story which UK press are well known to do.

However people do also approach them with information to sell or let things slip - clearly the social circle had some suspicions and those book lines were enough to identify the likely location and when. He was known and photographed enough at time that many people including press have a better idea of where he was at times like relatives deaths than he seems to have.

PissedOffofTiverton1790 · 09/02/2023 15:11

Yes it may not have been at blackmail/do a deal stage yet, but if they were on the scent it would only have been a matter of time before someone or other blabbed.

notanotheroneagain · 09/02/2023 15:24

KrasiTime · 09/02/2023 14:55

Are you on glue??

She was some side character in Harry's circles that no one would consider. how can you write such a thing? You sound vile.

Show quote history

You sound like you are on 'glue' and 'vile' yourself.

notanotheroneagain · 09/02/2023 15:43

I can understand Elizabeth H coming out, as she is already famous.
No one knew who this woman was. No one cares.

Ironically, if she had waited till some tabloid blackmailed her, she would have exposed that blackmail story with another publication - and that would have been a more juicy story (get how these things work?).

Anyway, it looks like mainstream TV has not bothered with this nonsense. Sounds like she made a bit of cash on the side of it - agree with everyone that she hopefully made some cash.

I said, whatever, as it's not a main story or anything in H book. Just some side story about a side character in 3 lines explaining something else. She was mentioned in passing, and not much detail given at that.

KrasiTime · 09/02/2023 15:44

No I’m not. Also would never refer to this poor woman who has been outed due to Harry’s book in such derogatory terms as you did.

Plitvice · 09/02/2023 15:48

@notanotheroneagain You sound a bit jealous of her.

notanotheroneagain · 09/02/2023 15:52

Jealous of who?

EH? Have not seen her in ages. But she is a stunning woman who dated Hugh Grant, so..................

Or of this other unknown woman who says she took the virginity of a 16yr old boy? Nah, not so much.

😂😂

IcedPurple · 09/02/2023 15:53

Ironically, if she had waited till some tabloid blackmailed her, she would have exposed that blackmail story with another publication - and that would have been a more juicy story

It wouldn't have been a 'juicy story' at all because everyone other than you is well aware that this is a typical tabloid tactic, and has been for decades.

Like I say, for someone otherwise so obsessed with how ghastly the tabloids are, you seem quite uninformed here. You also seem quite unpleasant about a woman who did nothing wrong, and had two decades to sell this story but chose not to until heroic Harry put it in his tacky book.