Butterfly ITV

[Melamin]

Anyone daring to watch?

(Did it really have a mermaid in it?)

I have not been banned, just wanted a break from all the unnecessary comments and let everyone, including me calm down.

So why name change? Why deregister? I don't get it.

jane - The rule is three strikes and you're banned. I believe you have been deleted more than three times. Did that constitute strikes?

You want a break, shut the browser. S'not hard

Precisely which comments are unnecessary? No comments here are "necessary" - it's a chat thread about a crappy tv programme

I imagine Jane has flounced and deregistered and just added a number to their name the next time. 3 names in 24 hours is good going!

"In the hands of the moderators" sounds like my stbexh when he starts making threats about things "being in the hands of a judge" when I refuse to dance to his narcissistic and abusive tune over the children. Male traits are very pervasive, aren't they.

Datun
*Once more you have twisted my reply so you can insult.

I believe I have described Blanchard's typology upthread?

Interesting that you continue to blame women for that though*

I do not blame women at all, at any stage, but you are obviously a unsympathetic woman on a mission with an axe to grind.

Shame, all I wanted is for peaceful discussion.............and got a barrage of abuse from a number of you. As I have stated before, this abuse and making me feel pretty lousy is a breach of The Gender Recognition Act 2004. Do you really want me to pursue that...............oh, hang on you will again say I am being manly, oppressive, and God knows what else, just by expecting people to respect the law, which does apply to UK based web sites.

You expect, rightly to be protected by the law, so why should not I??

As for the rules; yes these have been broken by a number of posters such as you and this is in the hands of the moderators.

Personal attacks is not the same as criticism. You can criticise up the wazoo. We're all grown ups here.

You can also say fucking cunts.

We're the website of women with all the swearing. Didn't you know?

As I have stated before, this abuse and making me feel pretty lousy is a breach of The Gender Recognition Act 2004

Im virtually positive thats not what the gender act says

Youve been deleted loads on here jane

I dont know what youve said but MNHQ obviously dont like it

PerverseConverse

"In the hands of the moderators" sounds like my stbexh when he starts making threats about things "being in the hands of a judge" when I refuse to dance to his narcissistic and abusive tune over the children. Male traits are very pervasive, aren't they.

Will you never give up being so abusive. I am SHE and have nothing to do with MALE traits. Are you saying female's in authority, like police officers, are really men? Amazing!!

As I have stated before, this abuse and making me feel pretty lousy is a breach of The Gender Recognition Act 2004

Interesting. Where?

Are you saying female's in authority, like police officers, are really men

What?

Jane thinks they're 'a female in authority'?

Which law precisely (bit of a habit here of not giving explicit detail about things, Jane...) is being broken?

I didn't catch "it is an offence to hurt Jane's feelings by not capitulating to every single thing Jane says, and hanging on Jane's every word like fawning fangirls" in the GRA2004?

Got a link www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2004/7/contents

Im very helpful...not helpful enough to read the whole thing, there are limits

I think so datun

In authority over whom?

Perhaps it was in one of the linked addendums that I didn't read?

"Are you saying female's in authority, like police officers, are really men"

What are you on about?

And I didn't call you "he" and I've not been abusive.

Step away from the glue.

Based on the quality of conversation/debate we're getting here rufus, I reckon the answer is "your mum"

Rufusthebewilderedreindeer

Im virtually positive thats not what the gender act says

Well you are wrong as my CPS documents on Tranphobic Hate Crime (last updated 15th August 2017) read in connection with the Act states.

Why oh why do you want me to resort to that? What is wrong with you and the others who have spouted offensive remarks?

Don't worry, the MN is going through my reports, and will continue to receive my communications until this stops. I apologized for some unnecessary and crass comments, and agreed with the moderators to delete some of my reactionery posts. Why cannot you be big enough to do the same?

Maybe you should recheck it beyond

#stillhelpful

Why oh why do you want me to resort to that? What is wrong with you and the others who have spouted offensive remarks?

What have i said thats offensive?

Im not apolgising for something i havent said

I dont do crass...

agreed with the moderators to delete some of my reactionery posts

Jane love, you get no say over whether mnhq want to delete your posts. They're benign dictators in the towers.

Rufusthebewilderedreindeer the truth. It's very offensive dontcha know.