Yikes. Trod on a nerve there OP 🤣
Post after disingenuous post implying that shorts, a tank and interesting shoes could only possibly mean sawn off jeans, a vest top from the supermarket and a pair of Irregular Choice dolly shoes with dog faces on or something.
A google of how people are wearing shorts gives loads of tailored shorts worn with all manner of sleeveless tank style tops in great fabrics and interesting shoes (mesh pumps, kitten heeled sandals, loafers). Not easy to pull off, and I struggled to find any diversity of body shapes as examples, but that’s beside the point.
Just as there are shorts and a tank (chic edition) and shorts and a tank (gardening edition), there are floral dresses (airy, elegant edition) and floral dresses (polyester sack edition).
The devil’s in the detail, as with all things getting dressed.
There ARE a lot of dreadful floral dresses knocking about. Incoherent colour palettes, busy patterns chosen cause they don’t need matching on the seams and can be stamped out of giant bolts of fabric by a machine with no wastage, cheap fabric and no finishing. Invariably they are constructed to fit everyone and noone, simultaneously. Tonnes of frills, tiers and unnecessary statement sleeves and ruching and pointless ties to distract from/compensate for the fit, construction and fabric.
There are some beautiful ones designed with an eye to the women who will wear them rather than the amount of them they can shift before it starts raining. I’d put Me + Em versions in this category, by and large so it’s interesting the OP chose that brand.
There are people on this thread telling on themselves by getting so out of proportion defensive and mean. I don’t think anyone who is comfortable in their skin and their clothes would be in the slightest bit bothered if someone else thinks that some of the dresses that they enjoy wearing (not their dress specifically) are ugly.