Please or to access all these features

Politics

What will it take for the Government to enact welfare reform?

1000 replies

Schlossadler · 17/09/2026 16:00

What has to break, before the Government is finally willing to enact welfare reform?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
14
KittyCorncrake · 19/09/2026 16:25

ExpectMore · 19/09/2026 16:22

Well there’s a saving right from the off. As a country we shouldn’t be giving people money that they can afford to put aside for a house deposit or uni fees.

This!

Differentforgirls · 19/09/2026 16:26

ExpectMore · 19/09/2026 16:22

Well there’s a saving right from the off. As a country we shouldn’t be giving people money that they can afford to put aside for a house deposit or uni fees.

We don't anymore but you seem to be against both higher tax payers and lower ones who save.

ExpectMore · 19/09/2026 16:26

Kirbert2 · 19/09/2026 16:06

Because they would be forcing children into these homes with strangers? The crime wouldn't have happened otherwise. The council would have to make sure that these shared homes were safe, especially for the most vulnerable.

I imagine some would have to be exempt. My son is a wheelchair user and I can't imagine he'd be able to squeeze into a place full of people sharing. I assume they wouldn't be very big/wide either.

Well they wouldn’t be forcing them. Merely providing them as an alternative to the families being on the street. The families would of course be welcome to find their own alternatives (which in fact is the preference). It also presumably would only be a temporary measure and not intended as a lifestyle choice.

yes they’d need to be designed accordingly. Presumably there’s perhaps also a benefit. More people around = more people to help with day to day challenges and less social isolation.

Kirbert2 · 19/09/2026 16:27

Burntatbothends · 19/09/2026 16:18

I imagine it more like university halls, every family has their own connected bedroom(s) with a bathroom, kitchens and living areas are shared with X number of families. The building itself could house lets say 100 family units, it would have a nursery free for all to use and meals would be communal, so all children would be guaranteed food, regardless of the choices of their parents. Clothing would be provided by a Clothing bank or similar. There are predatory strangers we encounter everywhere in life, we can't be fully protected from that. I view it more as a commune than a "workhouse", although everyone would be expected to contribute according to their abilities. People with serious physical disabilities likely would not be placed in such a home unless it was deemed suitable. It's not meant to be a punishment, it is practical solution for an overcrowded country with limited housing and a large welfare burden. You can leave at any time, it is not a prison.

Would ''there are predatory strangers everywhere in life, your child can't be fully protected from that'' be an acceptable excuse for you if you were removed from your council house, placed into communal living with strangers and then your child was sexually assaulted?

It would feel like a punishment even if that isn't the intention. For many people, it would be their only choice. It would be a workhouse with a different name.

ExpectMore · 19/09/2026 16:29

Differentforgirls · 19/09/2026 16:26

We don't anymore but you seem to be against both higher tax payers and lower ones who save.

I’m certainly not against higher tax payers, not sure what gave you that idea.

I’d actually prefer a flat rate of tax for all. Keep it simple to administrate (= cheaper to administrate) and incentivise working rather than increasingly punitive marginal rates of taxation (whilst the entitled still bark: “tax the rich!”)

Oopstheregoesanotherhouseplant · 19/09/2026 16:29

EasternStandard · 19/09/2026 11:16

Labour can’t borrow more, will probably try to tax more but it too will impact something like jobs negatively so that leaves spending.

Taxing wealth above 10 million at 2% will have zero negative impacts.

Etiennethemad · 19/09/2026 16:30

For a start PIP should be used to cover actual expenses, not a no strings attached handout. People with low level anxiety or depression should not get PIP. After all we all get depressed from time to time. PIP should be only for people with genuine life limiting issues. More should be done to help people into work. The Job Centres are pretty useless at this.

Differentforgirls · 19/09/2026 16:30

I do think the UK is broken. The selfish on this thread proves that. No humanity. It's awful.

Differentforgirls · 19/09/2026 16:31

ExpectMore · 19/09/2026 16:29

I’m certainly not against higher tax payers, not sure what gave you that idea.

I’d actually prefer a flat rate of tax for all. Keep it simple to administrate (= cheaper to administrate) and incentivise working rather than increasingly punitive marginal rates of taxation (whilst the entitled still bark: “tax the rich!”)

Oh they bark now do they?

Differentforgirls · 19/09/2026 16:32

ExpectMore · 19/09/2026 16:29

I’m certainly not against higher tax payers, not sure what gave you that idea.

I’d actually prefer a flat rate of tax for all. Keep it simple to administrate (= cheaper to administrate) and incentivise working rather than increasingly punitive marginal rates of taxation (whilst the entitled still bark: “tax the rich!”)

You agreed with a poster who said there should be no child benefit. Fruit vouchers instead.

ExpectMore · 19/09/2026 16:32

Kirbert2 · 19/09/2026 16:27

Would ''there are predatory strangers everywhere in life, your child can't be fully protected from that'' be an acceptable excuse for you if you were removed from your council house, placed into communal living with strangers and then your child was sexually assaulted?

It would feel like a punishment even if that isn't the intention. For many people, it would be their only choice. It would be a workhouse with a different name.

But folk go on holidays and stay in hotels all the time. There’s a certain tranche that love all inclusive deals with everyone eating the same soggy chips together at the buffet.

I don’t hear them raising any concerns about the dodgy strangers in their communal living space. Only seems to be an issue when they’re no longer getting their council house for free (/or massively below market rates). 🤔

ExpectMore · 19/09/2026 16:34

Differentforgirls · 19/09/2026 16:32

You agreed with a poster who said there should be no child benefit. Fruit vouchers instead.

Yes. That’s got 0 to do with being against higher taxed people. I don’t believe anyone should have child benefit. The money instead should be invested in child services and education.

if people genuinely can’t afford to have a child without child benefit then they can’t afford a child.

Kirbert2 · 19/09/2026 16:34

ExpectMore · 19/09/2026 16:26

Well they wouldn’t be forcing them. Merely providing them as an alternative to the families being on the street. The families would of course be welcome to find their own alternatives (which in fact is the preference). It also presumably would only be a temporary measure and not intended as a lifestyle choice.

yes they’d need to be designed accordingly. Presumably there’s perhaps also a benefit. More people around = more people to help with day to day challenges and less social isolation.

Disability isn't a lifestyle choice. The only reason why I live in social housing is due to my son's disability.

The only reason why I'm on benefits is due to caring for my disabled son.

I'm far from the only one out there.

Oopstheregoesanotherhouseplant · 19/09/2026 16:35

Differentforgirls · 19/09/2026 16:30

I do think the UK is broken. The selfish on this thread proves that. No humanity. It's awful.

I think lots of people don’t want punitive Dickensian times when you get down to policy and impact. I think there is a lack of critical thinking and knee jerk reactions to dog whistle politics. Farage and his ilk are trying to get us all to blame immigrants and benefit claimants so we get them into power so they can push through policies that increase their wealth and power. Not to mention him being buddies with Putin who wants nothing more than the Uk to be an unstable place.

Differentforgirls · 19/09/2026 16:36

ExpectMore · 19/09/2026 16:34

Yes. That’s got 0 to do with being against higher taxed people. I don’t believe anyone should have child benefit. The money instead should be invested in child services and education.

if people genuinely can’t afford to have a child without child benefit then they can’t afford a child.

Are you very young?

EasternStandard · 19/09/2026 16:36

Oopstheregoesanotherhouseplant · 19/09/2026 16:29

Taxing wealth above 10 million at 2% will have zero negative impacts.

I’m not sure about that otherwise this wouldn’t be the case

The 10 developed countries that dropped or repealed their wealth taxes since the 1970s are Austria, Denmark, Germany, the Netherlands, Finland, Iceland, Luxembourg, Sweden, France, and Ireland.

ExpectMore · 19/09/2026 16:37

Differentforgirls · 19/09/2026 16:36

Are you very young?

Nope. Have my own children. Pay for them myself.

Differentforgirls · 19/09/2026 16:37

Oopstheregoesanotherhouseplant · 19/09/2026 16:35

I think lots of people don’t want punitive Dickensian times when you get down to policy and impact. I think there is a lack of critical thinking and knee jerk reactions to dog whistle politics. Farage and his ilk are trying to get us all to blame immigrants and benefit claimants so we get them into power so they can push through policies that increase their wealth and power. Not to mention him being buddies with Putin who wants nothing more than the Uk to be an unstable place.

Agree.

Differentforgirls · 19/09/2026 16:38

ExpectMore · 19/09/2026 16:37

Nope. Have my own children. Pay for them myself.

So you don't get free childcare?

Oopstheregoesanotherhouseplant · 19/09/2026 16:39

Kirbert2 · 19/09/2026 16:34

Disability isn't a lifestyle choice. The only reason why I live in social housing is due to my son's disability.

The only reason why I'm on benefits is due to caring for my disabled son.

I'm far from the only one out there.

Exactly. The vast majority of people claiming benefits and using social housing are absolutely in need of it and the fact there are systems in place to ensure people have (mostly) got homes and can eat is the sign of a civilised society. Additionally it allows people to benefit society when they have that safety net. You are caring for your son and you wouldn’t be able to without that support. Your son would then need state care.

Of course there are some that milk the system. You can’t avoid that. But benefits are not the issue.

Kirbert2 · 19/09/2026 16:40

ExpectMore · 19/09/2026 16:37

Nope. Have my own children. Pay for them myself.

I did too.

Then my son almost died and will now need care for the rest of his life and I lost my job and home due to it.

Life can change in an instant.

TemperanceWest · 19/09/2026 16:41

Differentforgirls · 19/09/2026 16:30

I do think the UK is broken. The selfish on this thread proves that. No humanity. It's awful.

I don't think this thread represents how people are in general. They are much kinder in real life. Social media brings out the worst in some people.

Oopstheregoesanotherhouseplant · 19/09/2026 16:41

EasternStandard · 19/09/2026 16:36

I’m not sure about that otherwise this wouldn’t be the case

The 10 developed countries that dropped or repealed their wealth taxes since the 1970s are Austria, Denmark, Germany, the Netherlands, Finland, Iceland, Luxembourg, Sweden, France, and Ireland.

What would the net negative impact of it be?

We redistributed wealth after WWII and it means that we had greater social mobility, less social inequality and ordinary working people could buy their own home and build modest wealth. Everyone had a better quality of life.

Differentforgirls · 19/09/2026 16:43

TemperanceWest · 19/09/2026 16:41

I don't think this thread represents how people are in general. They are much kinder in real life. Social media brings out the worst in some people.

I think you're right. I think the selfish seem to be overly represented on here.

dowagerqueenie · 19/09/2026 16:44

Etiennethemad · 19/09/2026 16:30

For a start PIP should be used to cover actual expenses, not a no strings attached handout. People with low level anxiety or depression should not get PIP. After all we all get depressed from time to time. PIP should be only for people with genuine life limiting issues. More should be done to help people into work. The Job Centres are pretty useless at this.

You have to be disabled by your anxiety or depression to qualify for PIP and the assessment criteria are exactly the same as for those with a physical disability. So you have to provide compelling evidence that you are unable to do basic things like cooking a meal, managing your finances etc on most days to receive it. Evidence of these things might look like a medical test showing serious malnutrition, legal documents that show your sibling has power of attorney for you and is actively having to pay your bills and manage your finances etc because you cannot. You aren't awarded without evidence and diagnoses are not considered sufficient evidence on their own although they will often strengthen a case. If there is evidence that you can do things like look after children or a pet, drive a car, leave the house to take your kids to school etc. these can be used against you to deny you enough points to qualify. If there is evidence you are leading a normal life that is indistinguishable from that of an able bodied person (many of whom as you say do indeed have low level anxiety or depression) you will not be awarded PIP. The politicians know this but they also know it's a vote winner to pretend that the system is a lot more lenient than it actually is so they can make endless promises to make it more strict. It's already strict enough to stop people with mild anxiety or depression from qualifying. Of course there will always be a very small amount of fraud but that doesn't mean that people routinely get PIP for mild anxiety or depression. You get disability benefit by providing evidence that you are disabled.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.