Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

News

Seemingly harmless DM article about Princess Beatrice

166 replies

tortoiseSHELL · 30/04/2008 09:01

Starts off harmlessly enough, comparing various mothers and daughters, then WHAM. In with the venom. Wtf is ""Beatrice does not have to carry the sins of the mother on her thighs. She has a wonderful and privileged life ahead of her, but unless she gets her body under control, she'll have a lifetime of yo-yo dieting and pitiful self-esteem. Just ask Fergie. Which does make you rather wonder where her mother is in all this. "" all about?

and ""But all is not lost. I'm sure Weight-Watchers would snap up a royal mother and daughter deal. At least Beatrice has now got the "before" pictures.""

I hate that paper so much!

OP posts:
milliec · 30/04/2008 09:04

Message withdrawn

Legoleia · 30/04/2008 09:07
Uriel · 30/04/2008 09:08
theUrbanNixie · 30/04/2008 09:09

Vile vile vile.

unknownrebelbang · 30/04/2008 09:09

There is nothing harmless about the DM.

LilRedWG · 30/04/2008 09:10

Urgh.

TheApprentice · 30/04/2008 09:10

FGS have they not got anything better to write about?

misdee · 30/04/2008 09:13

horrid!

thought she looked lovely and very womanly.

LilRedWG · 30/04/2008 09:14

I think she looks great too - I'd be happy with her figure.

Enid · 30/04/2008 09:15

how unutterably horrible

come the revolution the DM and all its journalists will be first agains the wall

Titter · 30/04/2008 09:16

scumbags

tortoiseSHELL · 30/04/2008 09:17

Absolutely enid.

They printed some research of my brothers this week, but had failed to read it properly, so changed it a bit into 'Daily Mail' speak, and the comments he got were so horrible - things like 'this researcher deserves a phd in stating the blindingly obvious'. [defensive of my brother emoticon]

OP posts:
themildmanneredjanitor · 30/04/2008 09:17

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

misdee · 30/04/2008 09:17

she is classic pear shape isnt she? arent women meant to have bigger hips/thighs?

ShowOfHands · 30/04/2008 09:17

What a horrid, nasty and pointless piece of drivel.

Think she looks lovely myself.

tortoiseSHELL · 30/04/2008 09:17

What got me (apart from the whole vile article) was the 'sins of her mother on her thighs...'

OP posts:
tortoiseSHELL · 30/04/2008 09:18

mmj - it is written by a WOMAN....Amanda Platell.

OP posts:
harpsichordcarrier · 30/04/2008 09:19

Amanda Platell
what a fkn bitch and a disgrace to womanhood.
not every woman's self esteem depends on the size of her thighs

Oliveoil · 30/04/2008 09:19

OH FGS

how nasty and foul

smallwhitecat · 30/04/2008 09:20

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

themildmanneredjanitor · 30/04/2008 09:22

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

AdamAnt · 30/04/2008 09:23

What a vicious old bitch. She's hardly a picture of athletic perfection herself...interesting how there are only head shots of her available.

hamster-cheeked harridan

tortoiseSHELL · 30/04/2008 09:23

no that's true

OP posts:
Oliveoil · 30/04/2008 09:24

oooh does she have her mothers cheeks?

oggsfrog · 30/04/2008 09:25

Am staggered at this piece of vile and vituperative journalism.

Swipe left for the next trending thread