Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To absolutely hate this government, and what they are doing to our country? PART 2

325 replies

CoventryCity · Yesterday 10:14

A continuation of Thread 1.

Strong words but is is how I feel at this point in time. All of them make me feel physically sick. Why? Well many reasons.. Here are just two.

Eg. They won't release sex crime statistics of immigrants / asylum seekers. Why? Other European countries have done, and it is not pretty. Our gvt gives out a leaflet asking them not to rape the locals. Why? Our gvt has said they won't house asylum seekers next to schools and nurseries, why?

Eg. UK now spends more on benefits than it earns in income tax. Labour have increased this - not reduced it. Astonishing. As they say - "Who can we tax in order to pay benefits to others?" That's Labour's Welfare Secretary. He's describing the priorities of Labour MPs.

In the last financial year, the UK government brought in £331 billion in income tax — and spent even more, £333 billion, on welfare, according to the Office for Budget Responsibility's latest economic and fiscal outlook (obr.uk/efo/economic-and-fiscal-outlook-march-2026/#chapter-6).

Previous thread
https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/am_i_being_unreasonable/5580786-to-absolutely-hate-this-government-and-what-they-are-doing-to-our-country?page=40&reply=154902611&utm_campaign=thread&utm_medium=share

Page 40 | To absolutely hate this government, and what they are doing to our country? | Mumsnet

To absolutely hate this government, and what they are doing to our country? Strong words but is is how I feel at this point in time. All of them make...

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/am_i_being_unreasonable/5580786-to-absolutely-hate-this-government-and-what-they-are-doing-to-our-country?page=40&reply=154902611

OP posts:
Thread gallery
8
EasternStandard · Yesterday 18:46

Shakeoffyourchains · Yesterday 18:34

Jim Ratcliffe et al.

Biting whose hand? The rich?

The same rich that have seen their wealth increase by over 300% while normal people worry about fueling their car or turning their heating on?

The same rich 1% than now own more wealth than the bottom 50% combined?

The same rich that claim to be job creators while laying off 10,000s to make way for AI?

The same rich that make record profits quarter after quarter while worker's wages stagnate and shrink away in real terms day after day?

The same rich that syphon off billions of pounds of public money into shareholders pockets while polluting our rivers and forests and fields?

That rich?

Hate to break it to you but allowing them to dictate our economic policy has not been working for the last few decades.

Phillipson and co smirking won’t help. 4000 jobs at risk.

EasternStandard · Yesterday 18:47

RedTagAlan · Yesterday 18:44

You have no internet ?

But you are posting on here ?

How do you manage that then?

I do hence I get to read what I want to see. Lucky eh

RedTagAlan · Yesterday 18:56

EasternStandard · Yesterday 18:47

I do hence I get to read what I want to see. Lucky eh

Yeah. Facebook it seems.

Anyway, a FOI request does not mean that the requested info is evidence for anything, right ? I could do an FOI request on how much the MOD spends on baked beans, and what brands they buy.

The instructions are here.

Freedom of Information - UK Parliament

Petrolitis · Yesterday 19:01

Portmore · Yesterday 12:09

Seems quite sensible to not release figures that would be used to divide society & fuel hate, especially as a result of demands by racists & far right.

Extremists on all sides can manipulate data to fit their narrative.

Virtually all rapes & serious sexual assaults are committed by men. Men are the risk. The overwhelming majority are also British.

The biggest risk to women both in terms of homicide, serious assault & rape are partners/ex partners.

Stop hijacking women's safety to fuel your agenda

Edited

Exactly and the uk armed forces had a similar leaflet produced for them in 2015.

EasternStandard · Yesterday 19:02

RedTagAlan · Yesterday 18:56

Yeah. Facebook it seems.

Anyway, a FOI request does not mean that the requested info is evidence for anything, right ? I could do an FOI request on how much the MOD spends on baked beans, and what brands they buy.

The instructions are here.

Freedom of Information - UK Parliament

Nope I’m not on FB, you might be idk. Or perhaps you go for less female dominated sites than mn instead.

The FOI request is to the MoJ. I’m happy to see what the appeal determines, perhaps Labour will lose and have to release.

RedTagAlan · Yesterday 19:02

EasternStandard · Yesterday 18:46

Phillipson and co smirking won’t help. 4000 jobs at risk.

You mean the jobs that the billionaire owners are making redundant.... to make more money ?

Or are the business owners all really socialists, and it is "evil" labour politicians that have some nefarious new world order planned ? Cos Satan or something.

Clavinova · Yesterday 19:04

Mouldemort · Yesterday 14:19

More scattergun anti-immigrant nonsense, with the same lies you introduced in your previous threads.

Net immigration is going down. The annual number of asylum seekers is going down. Do you acknowledge this? If not, there is literally no point in engaging with you.

It's those who are protesting against asylum seekers who are by far the biggest danger to women and children. More than 40% of them have convictions for domestic violence. The problem is half-witted racist nonces, not asylum seekers.

Do you support or excuse their activities?

Why on earth are you comparing income takes to the cost of benefits? The benefits bill (which is mainly pensions) is the same percentage of GDP as it was in 1999. If you want more money, look at the £59bn in tax avoidance.

Pat McFadden was COMPLAINING about his paraphrase of what some Labour backbenchers said, not supporting it.

That supposed "research" you point at from 2017 is badly evidenced and unreliable - there is no evidence in 2026 that immigrants and asylum seekers are more likely to commit VAWG, and plenty of evidence that Reform politicians and their supporters disproportionately do.

More than 40% of them have convictions for domestic violence

Convictions or reports? Do you have a link?

EasternStandard · Yesterday 19:05

RedTagAlan · Yesterday 19:02

You mean the jobs that the billionaire owners are making redundant.... to make more money ?

Or are the business owners all really socialists, and it is "evil" labour politicians that have some nefarious new world order planned ? Cos Satan or something.

The gov is actually meant to care about jobs.

RedTagAlan · Yesterday 19:12

EasternStandard · Yesterday 19:05

The gov is actually meant to care about jobs.

And they have to deal with some pretty mean people that don't.

While being left to pick up the pieces after those mean people have done their stuff, all in the name of them becoming richer.

And you think the ultra rich who make the redundancies care about you, as you score your X on your ballot ?

Somerford · Yesterday 19:13

Clavinova · Yesterday 19:04

More than 40% of them have convictions for domestic violence

Convictions or reports? Do you have a link?

There is no link to support the claim that 40% of all of those protestors had criminal convictions. There is data on those who were arrested at the protests, but people who are inclined to behave in ways that get them arrested in such circumstances are of course more likely to have prior convictions. Using their offending history to smear everybody who protested is obviously dishonest and disingenuous, perhaps deliberately so.

Badbadbunny · Yesterday 19:14

Shakeoffyourchains · Yesterday 18:34

Jim Ratcliffe et al.

Biting whose hand? The rich?

The same rich that have seen their wealth increase by over 300% while normal people worry about fueling their car or turning their heating on?

The same rich 1% than now own more wealth than the bottom 50% combined?

The same rich that claim to be job creators while laying off 10,000s to make way for AI?

The same rich that make record profits quarter after quarter while worker's wages stagnate and shrink away in real terms day after day?

The same rich that syphon off billions of pounds of public money into shareholders pockets while polluting our rivers and forests and fields?

That rich?

Hate to break it to you but allowing them to dictate our economic policy has not been working for the last few decades.

Hate to break it to you but most dividends paid to "shareholders" are actually paid into our pension funds, as pension funds are often significant shareholders in all kinds of companies. Our pension funds would collapse if firms stopped marking profits and stopped paying dividends.

Gtfto2024 · Yesterday 19:26

Somerford · Yesterday 19:13

There is no link to support the claim that 40% of all of those protestors had criminal convictions. There is data on those who were arrested at the protests, but people who are inclined to behave in ways that get them arrested in such circumstances are of course more likely to have prior convictions. Using their offending history to smear everybody who protested is obviously dishonest and disingenuous, perhaps deliberately so.

So the women are lying. Fabulous default from the protectors of are women n children.

Minimising and enabling assault. Lovely.

Clavinova · Yesterday 19:39

Brudffaa · Yesterday 12:32

I thought you can't get benefits as an immigrant until you get ILR

Shelter have a list:

You can usually get benefits in the UK if you have:

  • British or Irish citizenship
  • EU settled status
  • indefinite leave to remain (ILR)
  • refugee status or humanitarian protection
  • a visa under the Ukraine family scheme or the Homes for Ukraine scheme.

You have to meet extra conditions if you have EU pre-settled status.
You might be able to get UC if the EU settlement scheme is still dealing with your application.

You can sometimes get Home Office permission to claim benefits if your relationship ends because of domestic abuse.

Commonwealth citizens
You can get UC if you're habitually resident and have right of abode.

https://england.shelter.org.uk/housing_advice/benefits/universal_credit_immigration_and_residence_conditions

I think most people can apply for indefinite leave to remain after 5 years - Shabana Mahmood was supposed to be changing that, but who knows...

Clavinova · Yesterday 19:55

RedTagAlan · Yesterday 17:26

Quote "Can you think of any reasons why they wouldn’t release the data…?"

Have you looked for the data ? Do mean this for example?

Statistics on Ethnicity and the Criminal Justice System, 2024 (HTML) - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)

What exact data are you looking for ? It can usually be found, it just needs looking for. The above link is an overview, and will likely need a lot of clicks to find what you seek.

Sometimes it does not exist, and it is explained why it does not exist. I recall, for example, that only convictions are recorded and published, wrt race etc, because accusations are not a reliable metric.

Accusations are not a reliable metric

Oh really.

Somerford · Yesterday 19:58

Gtfto2024 · Yesterday 19:26

So the women are lying. Fabulous default from the protectors of are women n children.

Minimising and enabling assault. Lovely.

You post makes very little sense as a response to mine to be honest with you. Did you quote the right person?

Brudffaa · Yesterday 20:21

Shakeoffyourchains · Yesterday 18:34

Jim Ratcliffe et al.

Biting whose hand? The rich?

The same rich that have seen their wealth increase by over 300% while normal people worry about fueling their car or turning their heating on?

The same rich 1% than now own more wealth than the bottom 50% combined?

The same rich that claim to be job creators while laying off 10,000s to make way for AI?

The same rich that make record profits quarter after quarter while worker's wages stagnate and shrink away in real terms day after day?

The same rich that syphon off billions of pounds of public money into shareholders pockets while polluting our rivers and forests and fields?

That rich?

Hate to break it to you but allowing them to dictate our economic policy has not been working for the last few decades.

I mean Jim earned all his wealth. He grew up in poverty, just studied hard, worked hard and turned round a chemicals company to make it super profitable. I understand why he's left the UK. Who wouldn't?

We don't worry about our car or the heating. We have 2 cars.

I understand why firms invest in AI. It's the future. Sometimes if you're not cutting it you'll get let go.

What are you on about the taxpayers?.they are the taxpayer and pay a lot of it.

Brudffaa · Yesterday 20:24

5128gap · Yesterday 18:36

What do you mean 'all the more reason'? I thought the reason you wanted them deported quickly was because they are 'fighting age' men roaming round the streets, with a high propensity for rape and murder? That you were just concerned about the safety of women and children?
Mothers and babies aren't going to be doing this, are they? They ARE women and children. So what are 'all the reasons' for detaining them in poor conditions before returning them to countries where they are unsafe as quickly as possible?

I mean surely they are best served back home in their home nation..they aren't the responsibility of the United States of America.

If you enter illegally, you should be detained and returned home.

BIossomtoes · Yesterday 20:31

Brudffaa · Yesterday 20:24

I mean surely they are best served back home in their home nation..they aren't the responsibility of the United States of America.

If you enter illegally, you should be detained and returned home.

Edited

You think? Best served in a country at war? In the midst of famine? Drought? How the fuck did we get to such callousness?

Brudffaa · Yesterday 20:35

BIossomtoes · Yesterday 20:31

You think? Best served in a country at war? In the midst of famine? Drought? How the fuck did we get to such callousness?

Still doesn't make them the US' problem

5128gap · Yesterday 20:40

Brudffaa · Yesterday 20:24

I mean surely they are best served back home in their home nation..they aren't the responsibility of the United States of America.

If you enter illegally, you should be detained and returned home.

Edited

The women and children who come to the UK seeking asylum are not going to be best served in their home nation are they? They are here seeking protection from what they've experienced there. If you want to deport them back to it, it does make your claim of prioritising the safety of women and children look a bit like...an excuse? A woman from Afghanistan is no less a woman. A baby from Eritrea is a child like any other.

EasternStandard · Yesterday 20:43

5128gap · Yesterday 20:40

The women and children who come to the UK seeking asylum are not going to be best served in their home nation are they? They are here seeking protection from what they've experienced there. If you want to deport them back to it, it does make your claim of prioritising the safety of women and children look a bit like...an excuse? A woman from Afghanistan is no less a woman. A baby from Eritrea is a child like any other.

The system isn’t designed for women. Especially under Labour with new policies re family reunification.

ilovesooty · Yesterday 20:51

BIossomtoes · Yesterday 20:31

You think? Best served in a country at war? In the midst of famine? Drought? How the fuck did we get to such callousness?

Sadly I'm not even surprised.

CorporalJohn · Yesterday 20:52

Compared to what the previous lot did to the country in 14 years I think Labour are bloody wonderful!

HollyhocksandPeons · Yesterday 20:53

CoventryCity · Yesterday 10:17

https://news.sky.com/story/asylum-seekers-warned-not-to-make-kissing-sounds-at-people-in-new-guidance-about-living-in-uk-13574744

'Don't rape, sexually assault or make kissing noises', asylum seekers warned in guidance about living in UK

Oh, shit, I just realised that when I see a cute (cute to me) dog in the street, I approach it, make kissing noises and put my grubby paws on the beast. I need to rethink my behaviour....

Brudffaa · Yesterday 20:58

5128gap · Yesterday 20:40

The women and children who come to the UK seeking asylum are not going to be best served in their home nation are they? They are here seeking protection from what they've experienced there. If you want to deport them back to it, it does make your claim of prioritising the safety of women and children look a bit like...an excuse? A woman from Afghanistan is no less a woman. A baby from Eritrea is a child like any other.

The UK exists to protect and safeguard UK citizens. They shouldn't be the charity to whole world. We can't fall for each single emotional arguement.

The safety of British women and children is paramount.