Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to want to express support for women who were assaulted at a political conference?

386 replies

Warmlight1 · 08/09/2026 21:41

To want to send out support to the two women visibly assaulted at a political conference.
I am concerned about the other protesters too and actually anyone who was hurt. But having to listen to jeering from the podium plus the crowd chanting in live TV at the same time must have been so traumatic and the publicity will die down and coverage move on but that can't be easy. Just want to send love and support.

OP posts:
emuloc · 09/09/2026 12:40

LuckyHazelFox · 09/09/2026 12:36

Yes, this is how I feel. The timing of the disruption was also ill judged.

That does not mean, that those people who violently attacked her, had any just cause for doing so.

LuckyHazelFox · 09/09/2026 12:42

Have I just read that women come running to the attention of little bells! Absolutely priceless. No, women can post on whichever threads they want.

CreativeGreen · 09/09/2026 12:43

LuckyHazelFox · 09/09/2026 12:35

So you don't understand that you are obliged to abide by codes of conduct within certain spaces?

And so, for example, whilst I would be perfectly entitled to "talk slightingly or contemptuously" of a Reform member, or to "treat with scorn or disrespect" or "despise" them, I would not be entitled to drag them around by their hair, or hit them with a stick, no matter what they were doing. Great, we agree.

LuckyHazelFox · 09/09/2026 12:43

emuloc · 09/09/2026 12:40

That does not mean, that those people who violently attacked her, had any just cause for doing so.

No but it does mean emotions are running high and tone deaf agitators might want to have a rethink.

CreativeGreen · 09/09/2026 12:44

LuckyHazelFox · 09/09/2026 12:43

No but it does mean emotions are running high and tone deaf agitators might want to have a rethink.

What if the protestors' emotions were also running high?

ilovesooty · 09/09/2026 12:46

hattie43 · 09/09/2026 06:06

Well here’s the thing . Don’t disrupt and enrage people and the chances are you won’t get your hair pulled .

Didn't take long for the victim blaming to start.

LuckyHazelFox · 09/09/2026 12:47

CreativeGreen · 09/09/2026 12:44

What if the protestors' emotions were also running high?

That's the whole point of them being there isn't it? That and wanting attention. John Prescott's agitator once found out the hard way.

Shakeoffyourchains · 09/09/2026 12:47

OneLilacHedgehog · 09/09/2026 12:33

Yes this is the truth. If a white woman had been physically attacked and jeered at by brown men at a left wing conference, the reform UK would have been up in arms. Reform supporters would have been saying this is what happens when you have men coming to this country from countries that don't respect women.

But reform UK supporters assault and jeer at women, and the response on this thread is they deserved it.

Tbf the majority are very much appalled by both what happened at Reforms conference and the response from their supporters.

It's just that their supporters are incredibly active on these threads. I mean 16.5% of all posts on this thread have come from one particular poster, who is also averaging around 7posts an hour over the last two and a bit days on these topics 🤯

HandPulledNoodles · 09/09/2026 12:48

LuckyHazelFox · 09/09/2026 12:43

No but it does mean emotions are running high and tone deaf agitators might want to have a rethink.

aka - People who protest Reform should be quiet or risk being assaulted? Great

Everanewbie · 09/09/2026 12:49

I have two thoughts at the same time.

This woman pretended to be a Reform member to disrupt their conference and she should not have been there in the first place, and could expect to be physically ejected. No one there wanted to listen to her, she was being self-righteous and self-indulgent.

This woman should not have been struck and received forceful blows, and the way the that she was assaulted was disproportionate. These men and Reform should hold themselves to a higher standard than this, and those who landed blows should face criminal action.

CreativeGreen · 09/09/2026 12:49

LuckyHazelFox · 09/09/2026 12:47

That's the whole point of them being there isn't it? That and wanting attention. John Prescott's agitator once found out the hard way.

I'd say the point was to make a very clear objection to the racist and violent rhetoric that Reform are putting out. And to many people, they have achieved exactly that, albeit at a physical cost to themselves. Brava!

emuloc · 09/09/2026 12:50

LuckyHazelFox · 09/09/2026 12:43

No but it does mean emotions are running high and tone deaf agitators might want to have a rethink.

Hopefully those involved in the unnecessary violence, that they were unable to control, will be thinking about their actions. There is hope!

LuckyHazelFox · 09/09/2026 12:50

Shakeoffyourchains · 09/09/2026 12:47

Tbf the majority are very much appalled by both what happened at Reforms conference and the response from their supporters.

It's just that their supporters are incredibly active on these threads. I mean 16.5% of all posts on this thread have come from one particular poster, who is also averaging around 7posts an hour over the last two and a bit days on these topics 🤯

We've been here before haven't we? I told you the last time that it's got nothing to do with you when I post and how often. If you are doing calculations on that, that says something very strange indeed.

cardibach · 09/09/2026 12:50

LuckyHazelFox · 09/09/2026 12:24

So I can expect to support who I want without being vilified - as I said.

No. You can support who you like without being jailed or assaulted for it. We can think it’s a vile choice though. And say so.

napody · 09/09/2026 12:51

Shakeoffyourchains · 09/09/2026 12:47

Tbf the majority are very much appalled by both what happened at Reforms conference and the response from their supporters.

It's just that their supporters are incredibly active on these threads. I mean 16.5% of all posts on this thread have come from one particular poster, who is also averaging around 7posts an hour over the last two and a bit days on these topics 🤯

Thanks for quoting the numbers here- that is very much par for the course and I try not to respond to that poster because derailing seems to be a literal full time job.

Incredibly they have just posted an on-topic comment:
No [ie it wasnt right to violently attack the protester] but it does mean emotions are running high and tone deaf agitators might want to have a rethink.

There we go. Simple victim blaming. She asked for it.

beeble347 · 09/09/2026 12:51

hattie43 · 09/09/2026 06:06

Well here’s the thing . Don’t disrupt and enrage people and the chances are you won’t get your hair pulled .

Are you joking? Non-violent protest is legal. Assault is not. It's not a case of "well, you started it, don't set me off." Why are we enabling dangerous people?

HandPulledNoodles · 09/09/2026 12:51

Shakeoffyourchains · 09/09/2026 12:47

Tbf the majority are very much appalled by both what happened at Reforms conference and the response from their supporters.

It's just that their supporters are incredibly active on these threads. I mean 16.5% of all posts on this thread have come from one particular poster, who is also averaging around 7posts an hour over the last two and a bit days on these topics 🤯

Indeed. Bit bizarre yet maintains they are a Conservative voter...

LuckyHazelFox · 09/09/2026 12:51

CreativeGreen · 09/09/2026 12:49

I'd say the point was to make a very clear objection to the racist and violent rhetoric that Reform are putting out. And to many people, they have achieved exactly that, albeit at a physical cost to themselves. Brava!

So she was there for that reason then - to provoke? Bravo. We got there.

LuckyHazelFox · 09/09/2026 12:52

HandPulledNoodles · 09/09/2026 12:51

Indeed. Bit bizarre yet maintains they are a Conservative voter...

...and in they come. Yes, a Conservative, and? Am I only meant to post on certain parties?

CreativeGreen · 09/09/2026 12:52

LuckyHazelFox · 09/09/2026 12:51

So she was there for that reason then - to provoke? Bravo. We got there.

I think you might have quoted me by mistake there - I didn't say anything about provocation?

soddingspiderseason · 09/09/2026 12:52

LuckyHazelFox · 09/09/2026 12:51

So she was there for that reason then - to provoke? Bravo. We got there.

She was there to exercise her right to free speech. Doesn’t justify the mob attacking her.

BackToLurk · 09/09/2026 12:53

WildWindySeascape · 09/09/2026 12:34

The assault was appalling and shameful.

Separately, I do not agree with protestors trying to disrupt events. Yes stand outside with a sign or a banner and make your case known, but actually disrupting events or travel or the lives of other people is obnoxious.

And Reform supporters could also have made that argument. However, they’ve opted for variations of “what did she expect/she was asking for it”.

LuckyHazelFox · 09/09/2026 12:54

CreativeGreen · 09/09/2026 12:52

I think you might have quoted me by mistake there - I didn't say anything about provocation?

Well you had to get racist in somehow. Did you forget that? Is that the point she was trying to prove. I thought it was about a certain sum of money that Farage had accepted?

emuloc · 09/09/2026 12:54

HandPulledNoodles · 09/09/2026 12:51

Indeed. Bit bizarre yet maintains they are a Conservative voter...

Well many of their voters, much like some of their MP's, are moving over to Reform, so....

CreativeGreen · 09/09/2026 12:54

Let's try again, and maybe this will be clearer. They were there to object. I'm sure they expected to be removed, and that is par for the course in situations like this. I doubt they thought 'I hope Reform bash us with sticks and pull our hair, that will be great'. But since that was indeed the way Reform responded, it does end up showing them for what they are.

Swipe left for the next trending thread