Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think Gill Pharaoh had the ideal end of life

259 replies

CurdinHenry · 23/07/2026 20:28

Article in the Times about this woman who decided to end her life through voluntary euthanasia at 75. Huge outrage on social media as a result as various people missing the point entirely express fury because they think being very elderly will be great fun. I personally don't want to get older than that. I don't ask anyone else to take the same view but it stresses me out that the naive want to reduce choices available to the prescient. Euthanasia should be available to everyone without condition.

OP posts:
WitchesBrew666 · 24/07/2026 21:45

Ihatehottubs · 23/07/2026 21:01

Having watched several very loved people die slow, painful and frankly horrific deaths, totally at odds with their clearly expressed and documented wishes, I am very much in favour of assisted dying. And who did this woman hurt? She chose assisted suicide, that doesn’t mean it’s mandatory. Her life, her choice. All of us with capacity should have the option to choose it. I wouldn’t dream of letting a dog suffer through what my relatives did, it’s barbaric.

I used to agree with this train of thought but having seen the myriad ways that legal euthanasia can be abused has made me do a complete 180.

Pedant61 · 24/07/2026 21:51

I agree, OP - good for her! We should all have the right to die simply and peacefully at a time of our choosing, whether we're 25, 45 or 75. It's nobody else's business. I have no intention of getting old(er) and decrepit, so if I want to die in a few years' time in my 60s or 70s, I'll bloody well do it. Who on earth want to live to 100?

Pedant61 · 24/07/2026 21:52

MrsShawnHatosy · 23/07/2026 21:32

Gill Pharaoh was not terminally ill. She had grandchildren and a partner. She was not in poor health. She had apparently always had thoughts about ending her life before she got old. I found her case chilling andI still do.

How is it chilling to have control of your own life? She sounds like an utterly fabulous person.

fartotheleftside · 24/07/2026 21:55

I think it’s a fundamentally different way of looking at life for me. To me, it’s not about having the best experience that you personally can, but being around and supporting loved ones, contributing to my community and profession as best I can. Appreciating the best of what life has to offer, nature and cultural experiences.

I’m in favour of assisted dying for terminally physically ill people as a means of ending great suffering, but choosing to go pre-emptively, even if you are a bit older and not in peak physical fitness, just seems sad to me.

fartotheleftside · 24/07/2026 21:57

fartotheleftside · 24/07/2026 21:55

I think it’s a fundamentally different way of looking at life for me. To me, it’s not about having the best experience that you personally can, but being around and supporting loved ones, contributing to my community and profession as best I can. Appreciating the best of what life has to offer, nature and cultural experiences.

I’m in favour of assisted dying for terminally physically ill people as a means of ending great suffering, but choosing to go pre-emptively, even if you are a bit older and not in peak physical fitness, just seems sad to me.

I guess what I mean by this is that life involves responsibility and duty and gratitude as well as personal fulfilment.

fartotheleftside · 24/07/2026 22:02

fartotheleftside · 24/07/2026 21:57

I guess what I mean by this is that life involves responsibility and duty and gratitude as well as personal fulfilment.

Saying that, I think I would feel differently if she was 10 or 20 years older and not mobile, even if her mind was intact, and if she was really suffering as a result. But 75 and in good health is way too young. I would feel so sad if my partner, parent, grandparent or even friend choose to leave me under those circumstances.

XenoBitch · 24/07/2026 22:07

She was a palliative care nurse, so that was probably something that heavily influenced her decision.

HeyThereDelila · 24/07/2026 22:09

YABU OP.

ApplesinmyPocket · 24/07/2026 22:55

"Having watched several very loved people die slow, painful and frankly horrific deaths, totally at odds with their clearly expressed and documented wishes,.."

"I’m 46 and if I got incurable cancer or something dreadful at any age, I would absolutely be in favour of this. My Mum had cancer and it was horrific to watch."

I'm 69 and not even going to make these lovely 70s which people speak so happily of, where they will be helping out family and doing fun stuff - I wish I were, too, but two years ago I was diagnosed out of the blue with stage 4 cancer - I thought I was very fit up till that point so it was quite the surprise. I've been lucky to make it two years further and get to know my first gorgeous grandchild, and I do help out with him as much as I can, though he's a bit fast and lively for his Nana these days!

So yes, I am totally in favour of assisted dying, especially reading posts like the two I quoted (no surprise to me, so don't feel guilty anyone who said this or similar!) I was really hoping to be taken out by a swift heart attack, but since one of the drugs I used to be on before it stopped working is known to affect the heart, I've had many tests and unfortunately it looks like my heart is going to be the last thing to go, lol.

FlyingPlank · 24/07/2026 23:18

I've read this lady's 'last words' and I don't think there was anything especially wonderful about her decision to end her own life.

She sounds debilitated - possibly as a result of post-viral syndrome after the shingles - and some of what she says is fearful projection. She talks about not wanting cancer patients in the last stages of life to suffer but that's not the same as pre-emptively killing yourself.

I support the narrow definition of medically-assisted dying i.e. doctors should be able to medicate people who are terminally ill who request not to be in any pain or distress, even when the medication hastens their death. But the reason assisted dying is unlikely to become law in this country is the concern that if it were passed, there would be demands from people to access it for personal suicide when they aren't terminally ill. The 'civil rights' type argument thar people should be able to end their lives when they see fit is actually a demand for other people to become involved - HCPs in particular - and for the state to sanction it.

IndigoBluey · Yesterday 01:37

Bakeittillyoumakeit · 23/07/2026 21:06

Yes but the risks are high of it going wrong in some way or you being discovered and resuscitated and ending up living in an even worse state. It's not fair that people have to throw themselves in front a train, hang themselves or go through some other horrific act when with assisted dying they could go peacefully with their family around them.

This is very well said. Sadly so many resort to horrific and desperate measures @kookieCrumbles

CurdinHenry · Yesterday 03:32

FlyingPlank · 24/07/2026 23:18

I've read this lady's 'last words' and I don't think there was anything especially wonderful about her decision to end her own life.

She sounds debilitated - possibly as a result of post-viral syndrome after the shingles - and some of what she says is fearful projection. She talks about not wanting cancer patients in the last stages of life to suffer but that's not the same as pre-emptively killing yourself.

I support the narrow definition of medically-assisted dying i.e. doctors should be able to medicate people who are terminally ill who request not to be in any pain or distress, even when the medication hastens their death. But the reason assisted dying is unlikely to become law in this country is the concern that if it were passed, there would be demands from people to access it for personal suicide when they aren't terminally ill. The 'civil rights' type argument thar people should be able to end their lives when they see fit is actually a demand for other people to become involved - HCPs in particular - and for the state to sanction it.

It's part of humane care. I don't want medics who want to torture me with prolonged suffering.

OP posts:
Doingtheboxerbeat · Yesterday 03:46

SquirrelGG · 24/07/2026 21:27

Being already retired just means I am further on in my journey than you are, and as I said the money in the bank will soon disappear and then I will have nothing but my superannuation to live on. I am also childfree, with no siblings, so therefore no-one to take care of me. So, what is this huge difference in our lives?

However I'm not sitting here bemoaning my fate as you seem to be. If you are still working what is stopping you from putting some money aside, or getting a better paid job? You already have more options than I do.

No, I'm not in Canada. I think maybe you should stop wallowing in self pity, do you seriously think you are the only person who has ever been in your situation?

Oh squirrel darling I have a bingo card here which I have just completed HOUSE, because based on your bad faith takes, I just knew you were going to suggest I improve my lot , by getting a better paid job 😁. Honestly, you couldn't be any more predictable, but it's my own fault for showing my vulnerability, which I hate doing on the internet, because of people like you.
Well done pet👍.

Itchthescratch · Yesterday 06:23

fartotheleftside · 24/07/2026 21:55

I think it’s a fundamentally different way of looking at life for me. To me, it’s not about having the best experience that you personally can, but being around and supporting loved ones, contributing to my community and profession as best I can. Appreciating the best of what life has to offer, nature and cultural experiences.

I’m in favour of assisted dying for terminally physically ill people as a means of ending great suffering, but choosing to go pre-emptively, even if you are a bit older and not in peak physical fitness, just seems sad to me.

It's easy to see how someone could want to end their life even using if they shared your perspective on it's purpose. Afterall if we all live long enough then we simply won't be in a position to support loved ones, contribute to the community of appreciate nature and cultural experiences. All of this can be taken away from you as you age and you can end up dependent on others for any quality of life. What then? There is no prospect of things getting better and many just don't want to live like this.

I also find it strange that so many posters object to the idea that people might want AD in order to not be a burden to others, especially loved ones. I am one of these people and can state now whilst I'm relatively young and fit that I don't want my husband or kid saddled with caring for me for long periods of time. I don't want it for them or me. It's one of my worst nightmares. I hate it that other people want to decide that this form of reasoning is unacceptable. Who are they to override my views and wishes?

Itchthescratch · Yesterday 06:25

CurdinHenry · Yesterday 03:32

It's part of humane care. I don't want medics who want to torture me with prolonged suffering.

Yes, the exact same arguments can be made about abortion and yet this is legal despite some medics have strong moral opposition to it.

6ate9 · Yesterday 07:31

Everyone SHOULD have the right to die. There should be no suffering requirement to access assisted dying. Autonomy should be enough. There are a lot worse things than death.

(“Death is not the greatest loss in life. The greatest loss is what dies inside us while we live.”)

CurdinHenry · Yesterday 08:38

I think some people are very naive about what happens to the self as we decline

Agree it's fine not to want to be a burden

OP posts:
MrsShawnHatosy · Yesterday 08:46

CurdinHenry · Yesterday 08:38

I think some people are very naive about what happens to the self as we decline

Agree it's fine not to want to be a burden

But it’s not fine for other people to decide you are a burden, or that you are no longer worth keeping alive after a certain age, regardless of your health. Anyone who believes this sort of mission creep could never happen if euthanasia is legalised is very naive.

6ate9 · Yesterday 08:51

CurdinHenry · Yesterday 08:38

I think some people are very naive about what happens to the self as we decline

Agree it's fine not to want to be a burden

So true. People go from life to death without wanting to consider the decline in between. But it’s the decline that’s the hardest part.

RVectensian · Yesterday 08:52

CurdinHenry · 23/07/2026 22:14

75 is very elderly, yes. I don't want to run the risk of what people die of naturally at that age. I don't think your distaste should stop me planning my own life.

75 is not 'very elderly'. 85 maybe.

At 75 and 80 my parents volunteer 2 days a week (1 in a physical role), participate in sport, look after their grandkids. One has had a physical disability since their 40ies and have a very full life.

She is perfectly entitled to feel as she felt, but classing 75 as very elderly is a bit odd.

6ate9 · Yesterday 08:55

RVectensian · Yesterday 08:52

75 is not 'very elderly'. 85 maybe.

At 75 and 80 my parents volunteer 2 days a week (1 in a physical role), participate in sport, look after their grandkids. One has had a physical disability since their 40ies and have a very full life.

She is perfectly entitled to feel as she felt, but classing 75 as very elderly is a bit odd.

Age 75 is often categorised as the start of late elderly or middle-old age. Chronological breakdowns typically split older adulthood into early-old (65 to 74) and late-old or late elderly (75 and above.)

Cheese55 · Yesterday 08:59

Doingtheboxerbeat · 23/07/2026 20:51

I'm child free by choice (no regrets) don't have a lot of money, will be relying on state pension and don't own my own property.
I also know lots of people in the same position.
I'm weary of naive people who can't envisage the dire choices some of us will face.

Why does that mean you can't have quality of life?

Saloonbaboon · Yesterday 09:01

I believe in assisted dying in principal but I'm extremely wary of it in practice in our current society. Even so many of these threads the posts are made up of posters describing others experiences /life's and concurring that person would be or would have been better off dead which just adds to my fear that individuals choices will be heavily influenced by their loved ones and society where it's basically going to be selfish to want financial support and good care and even better palliative care instead of "choosing" AD. I mean an annual offer to end your life after 75 jesus Christ..🤦🏻‍♀️

And before anyone brings up again how it's less risk than unassisted suicide - it really isn't and it's another thing that makes me uncomfortable that people naively think AD guarantees a pain free death when actually the complication rate is quite high.

Imdunfer · Yesterday 09:02

XenoBitch · 24/07/2026 22:07

She was a palliative care nurse, so that was probably something that heavily influenced her decision.

I have to restrain myself not to write what I experienced volunteering in one of the best hospices in the country, so as not to upset people.

It has certainly informed my own decision about how I intend to die, and it won't be in a hospice.

Cheese55 · Yesterday 09:04

CurdinHenry · Yesterday 03:32

It's part of humane care. I don't want medics who want to torture me with prolonged suffering.

I'm not sure where people get this idea. Usually medics only treat reversible conditions.