Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU - Not allowing school to film my child?

224 replies

GlasgowANN · 22/07/2026 11:31

AIBU? My child is at a summer club and they want to take photos and videos of the kids. I've said absolutely no way. They then said my child would have to sit out whenever they were filming, which I'm not happy about because I don't think they should miss out. Now they're saying they just won't take any photos or videos of any of the children because of it, so everyone misses out. AIBU for not allowing my child to be filmed?

OP posts:
oceanblueandturquoise · 23/07/2026 08:23

I don’t think anyone’s demanding anything, but it’s difficult when one side wants something and the other doesn’t.

PopandFizz · 23/07/2026 08:48

Lots of people being unfair to OP here, I work for a film company and we film big group activities all the time and miss out people that dont give photo consent without them having to miss out on anything.
Unless it is literally a group photo (which they dont need) theres no reason they cant film around the child. To make this work better it is useful if the child wears a bright colour or something that stands out (eg no face shots of the child in yellow).

As a parent, I dont allow my child to be filmed either despite what I do for a living!! There are many valid reasons why. People are naive to the dangers of kids being put on socials these days. AI can do terrifying things to images.

OwlOfBrown · 23/07/2026 09:24

You're not unreasonable to not want your child photographed or videod. That's your choice.

You are being unreasonable by then complaining that they'll have to sit out when videos/photos are being taken. It's usually just a couple of moments when they need to step aside. I do this all the time with my Brownies. I explain to the child that their parent doesn't want them to have their photograph taken and ask them to help me take the photo of the others. It helps reduce the disappointment the child feels as, almost invariably, the parent hasn't bothered to inform their child of their decision.

Parents: if you don't want your child to have their photo taken, make sure your child knows that.

Mrssagt · 23/07/2026 09:26

Goatsarebest · 22/07/2026 15:58

And each parent makes an informed decision based on that and other information. This is not the issue here. Nobody has any problem in regard to the decision made to not have photos. The reasons for that decision by a patent are always valid, whatever they are and are nobody's business apart from the parent and not open to question.
The issue here is that if you make that decision as a parent is it reasonable to then expect no photos of children that parent's have consented to be photographed, because your child will be 'missing out' when they are being taken.
The debate on reasons for a decision to give or not give consent is just a smokescreen.

You would have a point if OP was worried their child was being left out of photos, the concern was that their child would have to stop doing the activity that OP has paid for them to do so that the organisers can get free advertising material. An appropriate response from the organisers would be to simply not point the camera at the child without photo consent.

My daughter isn’t allowed in photos to be shared by her school so they just don’t photograph her. She has never been asked to stop an activity so that they can photograph. The only thing she’s ever told not to do (and actually it’s normally her reminding the teachers) is not stand in group photos.

MrsOni · 23/07/2026 10:14

PopandFizz · 23/07/2026 08:48

Lots of people being unfair to OP here, I work for a film company and we film big group activities all the time and miss out people that dont give photo consent without them having to miss out on anything.
Unless it is literally a group photo (which they dont need) theres no reason they cant film around the child. To make this work better it is useful if the child wears a bright colour or something that stands out (eg no face shots of the child in yellow).

As a parent, I dont allow my child to be filmed either despite what I do for a living!! There are many valid reasons why. People are naive to the dangers of kids being put on socials these days. AI can do terrifying things to images.

As a film company, you are obviously going to be used to working around things like this.

We're talking about a summer camp type place here, probably (from experience) run on an absolute shoestring budget with min. wage staff. Clearly all they want to do is take a few pictures/videos of the kids to send to the parents and won't have the time to fanny about filtering kids out, cropping shots etc.

The choice will be either have the kids who can't be captured (for whatever reason) just step away for a minute or 2, or just not use cameras at all.

thatgreenjuniper · 23/07/2026 11:26

GetItRight321 · 23/07/2026 07:35

NSPCC guidelines are that children should never be excluded from an activity just because the parent doesn't give permission for photography.

Given the escalating threat of AI CSAM organisations need to rethink their policies on filming and photography in general.

No one is talking about "excluding" a child, no need to be dramatic.

They're not going to film or take photos for hours on end. It just mean moving a child or taking a break for a few minutes during the activity.

If they play football and a few were substitutes, no one would say they were "excluded" if they all take turn, would they. It's just those parents being precious.

Pinkpony123 · 23/07/2026 12:39

Not unreasonable at all! You have the right to choose how your child's image is used it's not that hard to cover over your child's face with an emoji or not take photos/videos on their table or group. Are the photos for social media purposes or for sharing with the parents?

Pinkpony123 · 23/07/2026 12:45

You never know who knows someone or what someone will do with the photos though, especially for children who are adopted or have escaped DV especially.

LiveTheDream8998 · 23/07/2026 13:09

No - you aren't being unreasonable to ask that your child's photo isn't taken, but you also should not be made to feel like you're causing an issue either. If the summer school decide on no photos at all, that's not on you. It's down to their confidence.

They are able to take photos of others and can do this without overly excluding your child.

It's not on you.

LizzieW1969 · 23/07/2026 16:35

We’ve always been very cautious about photos being taken of our 2 DDs as they’re adopted. So IMO you’re not unreasonable at all.

Kiwimum75 · 24/07/2026 16:06

You are not being unreasonable, what is the purpose for the photos and videos being taken? I totally understand your point of view.

ChalkOutlines · 24/07/2026 16:09

Kiwimum75 · 24/07/2026 16:06

You are not being unreasonable, what is the purpose for the photos and videos being taken? I totally understand your point of view.

Promotion, updates to parents, evidence fir Ofsted/regulatory bodies/funding.

Kiwimum75 · 24/07/2026 16:11

ChalkOutlines · 24/07/2026 16:09

Promotion, updates to parents, evidence fir Ofsted/regulatory bodies/funding.

The summer club at our school doesn’t take any photos or videos 🤷‍♀️

Casperroonie · 24/07/2026 20:55

SakuraTea · 22/07/2026 11:37

Is there a particular reason you dont want photos?

IRRELEVANT. If someone doesn't want their child photographed or filmed that's a good enough reason.

Runnermumof2 · Yesterday 20:03

I don't give permission for this at my daughter's school either. She's been there three years now and it's never been an issue. At event days she (and others) wear a sticker that says 'no photos ' so the people taking pics don't do it by accident. And if they do then they know to edit her out

Kattlia · Yesterday 20:06

Absolutely unreasonable!jeezzzz they even said they'll do it Without your kids in them but you're still not happy!awful!

Linnende · Yesterday 20:22

🤦‍♂️Don't send your child to summer camp....SIMPLESSSS!!!

Yaya147 · Yesterday 21:41

Thinking back to my school days when parents refused, they would record everyone and sign a disclaimer to reassure those who do not wish to be included have their images deleted through editing. Now that was 20+ years ago. Whoever you're dealing with is being either a party pooper, manipulative or a creep...

waitinginwonderland · Yesterday 21:49

Mariets · 22/07/2026 12:29

I'm quite puzzled by this question. If you're child is at risk of being found by someone who could harm him or her then I could understand thevsafeguarding issue , but not wanting them just to be photographed for a school activity that I presume will only be accessible to the other childrens parents is a bit odd. What do you think people will do with these photos?

I work in a school. We ask parents to be mindful of what they share on social media. They are not. On sports day last year for example many parents posted video footage of full races to socials. This meant we had to do a blanket ban on filming and photos going forward so as to not exclude children. Should we allow the filming and remove children from their class races because they have flown DV/been put in long term foster care because of abuse/been adopted and relocated from abusive birth family?

Mummyof2andthatsenough · Yesterday 23:58

On my summer camp email I got a reminder to "Remember to make sure to click to consent for videography and photography!" FFS, absolutely not. Hate the way they worded it as well

entitledtomyopinion · Today 00:06

I think unless there is a specific reason it’s a bit strange. Nice photos for your child to have afterwards isn’t it?

hulahooper2 · Today 00:10

yanbu to not want your child in photos , but Yabu to complain about them having to sit out of them, you’ve spoiled it for everyone

DenizenOfAisleOfShame · Today 00:36

I don’t see the other side to the AIBU.

Are you being unreasonable for demanding that everyone else’s enjoyment is spoiled just to suit you? I’d have thought the obvious and only answer is ‘yes’.

DreamyKoala · Today 12:42

HappyMamma2023 · 22/07/2026 11:46

You are absolutely not being unreasonable. They can still include your child and put a smiley over their face. Sounds like they are more bothered about advertising then having dun with the kids.

Not always this easy. The coaches/holiday club staff may not be the people using the photos for marketing, posting on social media etc. the safest thing is to not take photos at all of those who do not have consent.

i work for a community organisation and we have multiple groups taking place across locations. The session leaders know the people at their sessions and will know who has consent and who does not. When they submit those photos to the office, we would expect that if they appear in a photo then the relevant consent has been obtained - the volunteer who posts content does not know who the people are in the photo. If they know the name they can check the system but it’s unlikely they would know each person when we work with 100+ people each month. If someone does not have consent then they are asked not to be in the photo- or that photo is deleted before sending in to the office if they happen to be on one. They are not missing out on anything at the session other than a second or two taking a photo

New posts on this thread. Refresh page