Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to think Andy Burnham might call a general election soon?

664 replies

Mywishistoclimbthe3peaks · 20/07/2026 00:56

To think Andy Burnham will call a general election before Christmas? Yes it would be a massive roll of the dice but,

Reform - don't have the numbers for a GE and there's all frog faces suspicious money bringing him a lot of heat.

Torys - kemi doesn't have a lot of depth, I feel and she hasn't changed much in the polls. She's good at the dispatch box but let's face it anyone could stand up and insult the other side.

By calling a GE Andy would have his own mandate and break the deadlock of the back benchers.

Not being unreasonable = he needs to call a GE

Your being unreasonable = Robotic Kier and Ratchet Reeves have gone and Andy just needs to get on with it now.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
Desperatelyseekinglazysusan · 20/07/2026 11:37

BrownBookshelf · 20/07/2026 11:12

They do indeed. On that we're agreed, and if the Tories ever get back in they'll do it too. It's part of the playbook now. I don't think that's a good thing, but like the other downsides of social media we appear to be lumbered with it until a critical enough mass of people ignore it. However, it remains a fact that this scene was already well established before Labour's last period of opposition.

We also have mass disinformation campaigns, hacks etc coming out of China, Russia and North Korea. To combat that we need a properly funded, workable defence. Trump may be saying outrageous nonsense on Social Media but he is doing it in plain sight. Pobably as an accidental distraction tactic, encouraged by his BFF's Putin and Xi.

TemperanceWest · 20/07/2026 11:37

EasternStandard · 20/07/2026 11:30

Labour overall including supporters set the scene. Mn is an example, but obviously across the board, btl on press too. No one from Labour said hang on maybe we should hold back on this, they will say it now as they’re under the spotlight.

Edited

I think there is something rather large missing from this equation - Musk. He didn't go after the Tories the way he has gone for Starmer and Labour. MN posters, btl press etc. are a speck of SM dust in comparison.

MyDarlingRose · 20/07/2026 11:37

Why would he do that? He’s the PM why would he risk someone else getting in?

Don’t talk shite

BrownBookshelf · 20/07/2026 11:38

Desperatelyseekinglazysusan · 20/07/2026 11:37

We also have mass disinformation campaigns, hacks etc coming out of China, Russia and North Korea. To combat that we need a properly funded, workable defence. Trump may be saying outrageous nonsense on Social Media but he is doing it in plain sight. Pobably as an accidental distraction tactic, encouraged by his BFF's Putin and Xi.

Yes we have the exterior disinformation to worry about now. Concerning whatever your politics.

EasternStandard · 20/07/2026 11:40

BrownBookshelf · 20/07/2026 11:37

They didn't. There is no definition of 'set the scene' that will back up your claim. The tendency to call for GEs already existed and was not set by Labour, and the escalation of social media importance wasn't either. These things are facts.

It is true that Labour didn't say hang on, and it's also both a different point and a goalpost move. They didn't call for change and instead continued practicing an already established tradition, they couldn't possibly have done anything about the social media spiralling because they didn't have the power. For balance, this all applies to the opposition who are doing it now.

There is it’s all the Labour supporters who used SM. You can see it on here. Now you and others say hang on this is tough, well yeh that’s what you enjoyed at the time.

SerendipityJane · 20/07/2026 11:42

LagerLady · 20/07/2026 11:36

Why doesn't Charles refuse to accept Starmer's resignation - do something useful for once

Because - as we discovered when Boris illegally prorogues parliament - the Monarch has fuck all power.

BrownBookshelf · 20/07/2026 11:44

EasternStandard · 20/07/2026 11:40

There is it’s all the Labour supporters who used SM. You can see it on here. Now you and others say hang on this is tough, well yeh that’s what you enjoyed at the time.

Edited

Sorry just to be clear, are you claiming the people using social media during the 2019-24 Tory administration were Labour supporters, and nobody of any other political persuasion engaged?

I've told you before about not going waaah you just think that because you support Labour when someone whose politics you don't actually know makes a point you don't like, but I want to be clear exactly what flavour of that is happening here.

Mywishistoclimbthe3peaks · 20/07/2026 11:44

Sherpaio · 20/07/2026 06:02

I think he needs to get his feet under the desk, make some early bold changes, and then see how things are panning out at the polls. It does look like Reform have peaked and are now tanking somewhat; why give them them three years to regroup? That said, the polls are still not good for Labour.

This is my thinking and if he can't get the bold changes through then he could call an election to form his own government. He's already called (set his stall out) for a united party... we will see.

OP posts:
BrownBookshelf · 20/07/2026 11:44

SerendipityJane · 20/07/2026 11:42

Because - as we discovered when Boris illegally prorogues parliament - the Monarch has fuck all power.

And a good thing too.

LuckyHazelFox · 20/07/2026 11:46

A Roman Catholic PM. I've just discovered another reason to be wary but that's a whole new thread.

Mywishistoclimbthe3peaks · 20/07/2026 11:47

Meadowfinch · 20/07/2026 06:33

No chance, they would lose.

The Labour Party may want AB but the majority of the country do not.

The working population is poorer, taxes are at ridiculous levels and the number who live off benefits when they don't need to is out of control.

We have immigrant gangs running scams and money laundering on every high street.

NhS waiting lists are improving but education is a total mess. Our food security has been undermined. The grooming gangs have not been stopped. Our young people have been priced out of work. Small businesses are struggling.

Would people vote for a Labour with a fresh mandate? That's the risk he could take.

Terresa done it and it didn't go so well. Boris done it and got a good outcome.

OP posts:
EasternStandard · 20/07/2026 11:47

BrownBookshelf · 20/07/2026 11:44

Sorry just to be clear, are you claiming the people using social media during the 2019-24 Tory administration were Labour supporters, and nobody of any other political persuasion engaged?

I've told you before about not going waaah you just think that because you support Labour when someone whose politics you don't actually know makes a point you don't like, but I want to be clear exactly what flavour of that is happening here.

Edited

You what now? Labour supporters did to the last gov on social media what they’d like to stop now. Obviously that’s not going to happen.

tttigress · 20/07/2026 11:49

If he called one he would get more seats than he will in 2 years time.

The best he could hope for though is a hung parliament.

I don't think he will do it. The bad news will keep piling in and he will be as popular as Stammer in 6 months time.

SerendipityJane · 20/07/2026 11:51

LuckyHazelFox · 20/07/2026 11:46

A Roman Catholic PM. I've just discovered another reason to be wary but that's a whole new thread.

1688 called and wants it's bigotry back.

SuziQuinto · 20/07/2026 11:51

EasternStandard · 20/07/2026 11:47

You what now? Labour supporters did to the last gov on social media what they’d like to stop now. Obviously that’s not going to happen.

You keep saying the same thing.
It's been explained and clarified about the role of sm.

TemperanceWest · 20/07/2026 11:51

SerendipityJane · 20/07/2026 11:51

1688 called and wants it's bigotry back.

Indeed.

5128gap · 20/07/2026 11:51

MyDarlingRose · 20/07/2026 11:37

Why would he do that? He’s the PM why would he risk someone else getting in?

Don’t talk shite

Because the way things are at the moment, no one else would get in. We would have a hung parliament, which he would continue to lead in coalition with the other left of centre parties. He'd still be PM and have 5 years ahead of him rather than 3.
If he waits too long there's a possibility of the Conservatives getting their act together and becoming a meaningful threat as people drift back from the sinking ship of Reform.
I'm not saying he will do it. I'm saying this would be reason to do it.

LagerLady · 20/07/2026 11:53

The UK doesn't want socialism. If AB moves Labour to the left, he is doomed to lose the next election.

LuckyHazelFox · 20/07/2026 11:54

SerendipityJane · 20/07/2026 11:51

1688 called and wants it's bigotry back.

There's a lot of bigotry on MN, as you well know.

IDontHateRainbows · 20/07/2026 11:54

If he does it may be an own goal, after years of being a flip flopping centrist the recent labour government has made me lurch to the right and if anything, commie Andy will onky make me lurch further.

BrownBookshelf · 20/07/2026 11:54

EasternStandard · 20/07/2026 11:47

You what now? Labour supporters did to the last gov on social media what they’d like to stop now. Obviously that’s not going to happen.

Why did you use the word 'all' then? Do you think all Labour supporters did it, and if so how does that mean they had the power to set the scene? Or do you think all the people doing it were Labour? Because what you've written here is not like the rather mangled comment in the preceding post.

It's a lot of hole digging to back up a rather silly claim. Particularly when you could've just made the entirely reasonable point that it's annoying to see people who called for GEs when their party were in opposition suddenly change tune now.

SerendipityJane · 20/07/2026 11:54

Of course, if he were to call an election, it would be a shame if it clashed with the run up to the US midterms, when media bandwidth may be constrained.

BreathtakingBellingham · 20/07/2026 11:54

Meadowfinch · 20/07/2026 06:33

No chance, they would lose.

The Labour Party may want AB but the majority of the country do not.

The working population is poorer, taxes are at ridiculous levels and the number who live off benefits when they don't need to is out of control.

We have immigrant gangs running scams and money laundering on every high street.

NhS waiting lists are improving but education is a total mess. Our food security has been undermined. The grooming gangs have not been stopped. Our young people have been priced out of work. Small businesses are struggling.

This.
They had makerfield success but they forced that by election because so many councils went to reform !

SuziQuinto · 20/07/2026 11:55

SerendipityJane · 20/07/2026 11:51

1688 called and wants it's bigotry back.

It's awful, isn't it? Mind you I caught the tail end of a previous thread where Burnham's accent was being mocked so I think there's a level of desperation.

BrownBookshelf · 20/07/2026 11:55

LuckyHazelFox · 20/07/2026 11:54

There's a lot of bigotry on MN, as you well know.

There is. That isn't a reason for you to add some more.

Swipe left for the next trending thread