Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think it's time to leave the ECHR?

798 replies

Sausagenbacon · 16/07/2026 20:05

www.thejc.com/news/uk/gazan-family-refugee-status-asylum-rejection-gwsq2c8b

OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
Dorisbonson · 16/07/2026 23:08

XDownwiththissortofthingX · 16/07/2026 20:54

Killing myself laughing at the barefaced nonsense suggestion that politicians with a vested interest in extricating the UK from ECHR would just immediately set about replicating everything in UK Law anyway.

Anyone who believes this utter shite must have a zip up the back of their heads.

We wholesale applied EU legislation into UK law when we left the EU.

What's the basis for your assertion? Why do you think we would treat ECHR law differently to EU law?

Can you explain your position please?

100thingstoknowaboutspace · 16/07/2026 23:09

Daafdjdnd · 16/07/2026 20:36

They aren't our responsibility.

Neither were all the Ukrainians we allowed in, what's the difference exactly?

Daafdjdnd · 16/07/2026 23:11

The mother and her 3 kids were already in the UK. The court ruled that her 18 additional family members can come because the 3 kids are having"mental health issues" that their family members are trapped in Gaza.

What gives them any right to come here? I missed my mum a lot when we migrated here from India. Did that give my mum a right to come here as well?

Lavender14 · 16/07/2026 23:12

AutumnHazel · 16/07/2026 23:06

The best argument for keeping the ECHR isn’t that it stops future Governments from eroding our human rights, because it clearly doesn’t do that, as such a future Government can remove us from the ECHR and erode our human rights regardless!

Rather, it is that it provides a balance on Parliament, and provides a check against it from inadvertently passing legislation undermining human rights. The ECHR only has value where the Government of the day values the role of the ECHR to do this.

Keeping the ECHR in order to prevent a future Reform Government from eroding human rights, is a bit like trying to protect your valuables by locking a safe with a key, and then giving that safe to a burglar along with the key…. and then expecting that the burglar won’t use the key to open the safe!

Edited

Which is why we should not be voting reform...

Lavender14 · 16/07/2026 23:14

Daafdjdnd · 16/07/2026 23:11

The mother and her 3 kids were already in the UK. The court ruled that her 18 additional family members can come because the 3 kids are having"mental health issues" that their family members are trapped in Gaza.

What gives them any right to come here? I missed my mum a lot when we migrated here from India. Did that give my mum a right to come here as well?

Was your mum being bombed to bits in India and the images of the totsl devastation and starvation plus lack of sanitation and healthcare everywhere you looked? On a full country scale?

Anyahyacinth · 16/07/2026 23:14

AutumnHazel · 16/07/2026 20:38

That’s a profoundly undermocraric argument.

The things you mention are enshrined in UK law, so leaving the ECHR wouldn’t affect them as it stands.

However, if the democratically elected House of Commons choose to amend the law in respect of any of these things, why shouldn’t they be able to?… unless, that is, you don’t actually believe in democracy.

Edited

The democracy that more people vote against than for?

Daafdjdnd · 16/07/2026 23:15

These 18 family members aren't even in danger. They've been in Egypt for at least 2 years. They are not in danger.

WookieMama · 16/07/2026 23:16

XDownwiththissortofthingX · 16/07/2026 21:08

Well who is agitating for it?

It's much the same people who agitated for Brexit, the ones with a bent for uber-capitalism, deregulation, and fewer legal rights for the individual.

If you think they have anyone's best interests at heart, and are not just chasing yet more ££££ for themselves, then you aren't really paying attention.

Just ask yourself why anyone would want to remove legal protections, and why they'd do so only to immediately reinstate them via split new legislation. They wouldn't, because they have no intention of doing so no matter what they say. It's yet another pig in a poke being sold to the gullible in precisely the same way Brexit was.

Remember the Tory leavers assuring farmers and fishermen that they had nothing to fear from Brexit because the UK Government would make up the shortfall after EU subsidies were removed? A great many of them went out and voted Leave, and they're still waiting for that money to be made good. It's not nice to stand and say "we told you so", but really, some people deserve absolutely everything coming to them and can't be protected from their own stupidity.

Absolutely! No one wants to get rid of it to give us more rights, it’s about unfettered capitalism and a race to the bottom. Definitely a case of be careful what you wish for.

The fact people still conflate the EHCR as being something the EU forced upon us says it all imo. Britain basically wrote it and Churchill was its biggest cheerleader. It can be amended sure and it has its faults, but binning it is madness.

People here keep saying we can make our own legislation, of course we can, but if you don’t think there is a massive financial cost to that you are dreaming. Total waste of money we don’t even have

Lavender14 · 16/07/2026 23:16

Daafdjdnd · 16/07/2026 23:11

The mother and her 3 kids were already in the UK. The court ruled that her 18 additional family members can come because the 3 kids are having"mental health issues" that their family members are trapped in Gaza.

What gives them any right to come here? I missed my mum a lot when we migrated here from India. Did that give my mum a right to come here as well?

Also I hate to say it but a lot of the local families that were put out around here by anti immigrant gangs were not asylum seekers or refugees they were working migrants. If you think it's OK to create a hierarchy of which migrants are OK and which are not you are creating a very wobbly framework that is detrimental to any migrant living or working in the UK. Every single one of them.

CovenOfCheeses · 16/07/2026 23:17

Daafdjdnd · 16/07/2026 23:11

The mother and her 3 kids were already in the UK. The court ruled that her 18 additional family members can come because the 3 kids are having"mental health issues" that their family members are trapped in Gaza.

What gives them any right to come here? I missed my mum a lot when we migrated here from India. Did that give my mum a right to come here as well?

It is not the same. Was your mother being starved by a state hellbent on ethnic cleansing?

Love the fact that you got here and want to kick the ladder from beneath you. Are you called Suella or Priti at all?

beautifuldaytosavelives · 16/07/2026 23:17

Are you off your head?

ilovesooty · 16/07/2026 23:18

No thank you.

Anyahyacinth · 16/07/2026 23:20

CovenOfCheeses · 16/07/2026 22:59

We really need to get rid of the ECHR so we can bring back capital punishment. This is the only deterrent to benefit scroungers, hard lefties, trade unionists, illegal immigrants and unmarried mothers. Stringing a few of them up before a game of footie would rile the crowds and also make for good half-time entertainment. It is a kindness I tell you.

Rupert Lowe gets my vote as he is the only one making sense to repair our country. I am sick and tired of foreign human rights, they have no place in British society. No right thinking Englishman and woman would ever want European human rights darkening rheir door.

Lord Haw Haw has spoken

beautifuldaytosavelives · 16/07/2026 23:20

Daafdjdnd · 16/07/2026 20:36

They aren't our responsibility.

Goodness. Do you need help understanding the concept of humanity, Nige?

Lavender14 · 16/07/2026 23:21

Daafdjdnd · 16/07/2026 23:15

These 18 family members aren't even in danger. They've been in Egypt for at least 2 years. They are not in danger.

Edited

Do you not understand that people fleeing genocide often become seperated? Which is highly, highly traumatic? Family reunification is important. If you became seperated from your child, the person you care for, your husband or the last family member you had alive would you not want to do everything possible to make sure they were safe with you? And if you were well set up in a place where you knew you could support yourself and get them properly established would you not choose that to be the place where everyone would come together?

It blows my mind how people hold other human beings to a standard they would never ever keep in reality if the roles were reversed.

It's dehumanising.

Dorisbonson · 16/07/2026 23:21

ThisOliveKoala · 16/07/2026 22:56

Exactly, red carpet was laid out for Ukrainians, why can’t Gazan’s be afforded the same. An active war zone, mass starvation, children dying left and right…

Saudi Arabia literally has hundreds of thousands of unoccupied hotel rooms and enormous temporary accomodations capacity for Mecca which is unused. What are they doing?

They speak the same language, share religion, diet and many cultural ties.

Oh they refuse to take them in despite having capacity to do so because they are worried about Terrorism, political unrest and militants from gaza causing problems in their country.

In the 1960s Gazan refugees in Jordan tried to start a civil war in Jordan and were forced to leave the country by Jordans Army - thousands died.

Gazan refugees in Lebanon caused a 15 year civil war and made the country ungovernable despite being hailed as the Paris of the Middle East in the 60s before hand.

Egypt and Jordan refuse to take Gazans for similar reasons.

placemats · 16/07/2026 23:21

11AndCounting · 16/07/2026 22:55

I'm surprised you'd want to give up so many rights so easily.

With the ECHR, we have far greater protections of speech/expression and privacy, and has helped expose government cover ups, like Hillsborough and the Infected Blood Scandal.

Immigration rulings do often seem less than ideal, but I fear that they're being used as the thin end of the wedge in terms of garnering public support for having an unaccountable and overreaching government.

This 💯

SuffolkSun · 16/07/2026 23:28

AutumnHazel · 16/07/2026 22:47

You’re another poster who’s clearly anti-democratic (the people are too stupid to decide what’s best for them)….

I wish you and others like you would just be honest about it and admit you only give lip service to democracy, and actually you’d prefer a “liberal elite” (of which you’re a part) to govern us, as that would be better for us all.

You are advocates of “enlightened despotism”… At least be honest enough to admit it! I’d respect your views a lot more if you did! You may even persuade me you have a point. But pretending you, and others like you, are “democrats” is disingenuous.

Edited

Can you point to where I've said I'm a democrat?

Calling someone stupid is freedom of opinion, doll. A democratic right. "You people" have completely f**ked my country for decades to come because of your willed ignorance, your refusal to learn and understand even basic facts, your misplaced "we're special" exceptionalism and, yes, your blinkered stupidity. "You people" are too craven to admit you didn't know what you were doing in 2016 and as a consequence have screwed yourselves and everyone else - while simultaneously endlessly whining that there's no money, and the NHS doesn't work and why do I have to pay more tax and it's not fair.

Had you listened to the "liberal elite", the country would be £300bn (and counting) richer. Thousands of jobs would still exist. Thousands of British companies would still be operating. That money would be going into services and infrastructure to improve your life. That money would be used to keep your taxes low. But you didn't listen. And you "got" the sovereignty you always had. And as a result you and everyone you know is poorer and the infrastructure you rely on is creaking at the seams . And still you whine about a situation you wanted to happen.

And now "you people" are stamping your little feet and whining about the ECHR. You haven't bothered to learn the facts, you're not listening to informed opinion, you don't know what you're doing.The definition of madness is doing the same thing repeatedly and expecting a different outcome. The definition of stupidity is the section of the English public that repeatedly calls for actions that will make their lives worse, and their country a laughing stock - and then complains when what they called for comes to pass and their lives become worse.

So, exercising my democratic rights, I'm free to call "you people" what I think you are. You're stupid. Grow up and deal with it. And for f's sake, stop whining.

Booboobagins · 16/07/2026 23:32

Whatdidyoujustcallme · 16/07/2026 20:22

Yes. Let’s lose all equality, employment and right to a fair trial stuff! Who needs it - employers can hire and fire at will, you can fuck off with your maternity pay, in fact, forget your job, I don’t need a moody mummy asking for flexible working, or days off to look after her brats. Get rid of that silly PACE stuff, just lock em all up. If they say it wasn’t them, persuade a confession. No need for redundancy pay, or sick pay, or a minimum wage, or reasonable hours. No need for rights to a private life, who needs that?

You know when lots of silly people voted to leave the EU? And the same silly people are only just realising that they can no longer move their family to Benidorm and get a job and live there, or retire there because their income isn’t high enough?

That. You cannot cherry pick which bits of civilisation you like and ditch the bits you don’t. ECHR is international law, not just the EU you silly billy.

So we had no human rights, employment rights etc before ECHR? Give me a break! We had pretty good laws to protect people in UK, in fact we lead on most law when we joined the EU on health and safety, the environment, trade, finance too. The EU has continued to copy what we do here since we left too.

I think we should exit ECHR too @Sausagenbacon YANBU at all.

Cheesecheeks · 16/07/2026 23:34

Daafdjdnd · 16/07/2026 23:11

The mother and her 3 kids were already in the UK. The court ruled that her 18 additional family members can come because the 3 kids are having"mental health issues" that their family members are trapped in Gaza.

What gives them any right to come here? I missed my mum a lot when we migrated here from India. Did that give my mum a right to come here as well?

Was your mum at risk of death? That would help answer your question.

Lavender14 · 16/07/2026 23:35

Booboobagins · 16/07/2026 23:32

So we had no human rights, employment rights etc before ECHR? Give me a break! We had pretty good laws to protect people in UK, in fact we lead on most law when we joined the EU on health and safety, the environment, trade, finance too. The EU has continued to copy what we do here since we left too.

I think we should exit ECHR too @Sausagenbacon YANBU at all.

Reform are keen to undercut these, for example removing protections against 0 hours contracts .

Daafdjdnd · 16/07/2026 23:39

Lavender14 · 16/07/2026 23:21

Do you not understand that people fleeing genocide often become seperated? Which is highly, highly traumatic? Family reunification is important. If you became seperated from your child, the person you care for, your husband or the last family member you had alive would you not want to do everything possible to make sure they were safe with you? And if you were well set up in a place where you knew you could support yourself and get them properly established would you not choose that to be the place where everyone would come together?

It blows my mind how people hold other human beings to a standard they would never ever keep in reality if the roles were reversed.

It's dehumanising.

Okay and? Given they are both in safety, they could just go reunite in Egypt? A country that is more culturally compatible to them anyway.

Even if "oh Egypt won't give them permission to stay" (I wonder why) they can talk on the phone.

I thought immigrants coming here for work need to be self sufficient and have funds. The 18 that are coming over will have taxpayer funded housing, benefits for living costs, free NHS, free schooling and English as an additional language funding.

Daafdjdnd · 16/07/2026 23:39

Cheesecheeks · 16/07/2026 23:34

Was your mum at risk of death? That would help answer your question.

Her family are actually safe in Egypt and have been for a few years.

bittertwisted · 16/07/2026 23:40

Daafdjdnd · 16/07/2026 20:36

They aren't our responsibility.

Given the geopolitical division of these nations was driven by British imperialism it is very much our problem

Lavender14 · 16/07/2026 23:43

Daafdjdnd · 16/07/2026 23:39

Okay and? Given they are both in safety, they could just go reunite in Egypt? A country that is more culturally compatible to them anyway.

Even if "oh Egypt won't give them permission to stay" (I wonder why) they can talk on the phone.

I thought immigrants coming here for work need to be self sufficient and have funds. The 18 that are coming over will have taxpayer funded housing, benefits for living costs, free NHS, free schooling and English as an additional language funding.

May you never live through what that family has lived through. And if you ever do, God forbid, I hope people treat you with a bit more compassion than what you're showing. What would you do if you were in their shoes and you were here having made a life for yourself and your family were there unable to do the same begging you for help?

You also haven't addressed the serious issues around the hierarchy of immigration your position creates and the fragility that creates for all migrants including yourself?