Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think it's time to leave the ECHR?

798 replies

Sausagenbacon · 16/07/2026 20:05

www.thejc.com/news/uk/gazan-family-refugee-status-asylum-rejection-gwsq2c8b

OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
DuncinToffee · 17/07/2026 19:50

EasternStandard · 17/07/2026 19:43

Isn’t the whole point of the thread whether that should happen

From the article
An immigration tribunal has now overturned the home secretary, Shabana Mahmood’s, decision and ruled that the woman can bring her relatives, arguing that refusing entry would breach her right to family life under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).

It also states

The ruling does not create a general right for people in Gaza to settle in Britain. Instead, it is based on the tribunal’s assessment of the specific circumstances of this family’s relationship with their UK-based relatives and the impact the refusal would have on them.

EasternStandard · 17/07/2026 19:51

DuncinToffee · 17/07/2026 19:50

It also states

The ruling does not create a general right for people in Gaza to settle in Britain. Instead, it is based on the tribunal’s assessment of the specific circumstances of this family’s relationship with their UK-based relatives and the impact the refusal would have on them.

It’s overriding the home office decision based on the ECHR hence the op’s thread title.

DuncinToffee · 17/07/2026 19:52

LuckyHazelFox · 17/07/2026 19:49

The floodgates are well and truly open.

And you have evidence to back that up?

Daafdjdnd · 17/07/2026 19:54

The UK gov denies and just blanket revoked ETAs for people who wanted to attend the "unite the right rally". Rightfully so imo.

The Home office judged these people shouldn't have been coming over and it should have stayed that way.

DuncinToffee · 17/07/2026 19:54

EasternStandard · 17/07/2026 19:51

It’s overriding the home office decision based on the ECHR hence the op’s thread title.

And because of this individual case the OP wants us all to give up our human rights protections.

Would you not have done the same in their situation?

LuckyHazelFox · 17/07/2026 19:55

DuncinToffee · 17/07/2026 19:52

And you have evidence to back that up?

You don't think this hasn't set the scene for more cases? Extended families will be trying their luck left right and centre. The government's more robust intentions are only good on paper.

DuncinToffee · 17/07/2026 19:56

LuckyHazelFox · 17/07/2026 19:55

You don't think this hasn't set the scene for more cases? Extended families will be trying their luck left right and centre. The government's more robust intentions are only good on paper.

No evidence, just feelz?

ChunkyMonkey36 · 17/07/2026 19:57

Daafdjdnd · 17/07/2026 19:48

Yes a sovereign parliament can do so.

The UK parliament is already sovereign.

Would we like it to be… more sovereign?

LuckyHazelFox · 17/07/2026 19:58

DuncinToffee · 17/07/2026 19:56

No evidence, just feelz?

How can there be evidence when this has only just been granted? You may be naive to believe this is the end of it but I'm not. 18 family members. Let that sink in.

ChunkyMonkey36 · 17/07/2026 19:58

LuckyHazelFox · 17/07/2026 19:49

The floodgates are well and truly open.

I think I remember seeing a poster about that.

Daafdjdnd · 17/07/2026 19:59

ChunkyMonkey36 · 17/07/2026 19:57

The UK parliament is already sovereign.

Would we like it to be… more sovereign?

Id like them to change the law.

ChunkyMonkey36 · 17/07/2026 20:00

Daafdjdnd · 17/07/2026 19:59

Id like them to change the law.

Yeah we don’t make the legal and policy decisions, so can’t compel them to change laws adhoc just because we don’t like them.

That’s what we elect governments for.

We’re sort of not in charge.

DuncinToffee · 17/07/2026 20:01

LuckyHazelFox · 17/07/2026 19:58

How can there be evidence when this has only just been granted? You may be naive to believe this is the end of it but I'm not. 18 family members. Let that sink in.

18, I am letting it sink in

Eighteen

11 children safe

EasternStandard · 17/07/2026 20:02

DuncinToffee · 17/07/2026 19:54

And because of this individual case the OP wants us all to give up our human rights protections.

Would you not have done the same in their situation?

I think everyone would push for more family to join, it’s what Labour are trying to subvert because it’s not doable.

Labour MPs have just voted through much stricter family reunification policies, so if 18 people meet a right to family life it’ll be interesting to see if there’s a clash.

Looking up the process of what happens if there’s a clash it ended on this

4. The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR)
If domestic court avenues are exhausted, applicants can escalate cases to the international court in Strasbourg. If the ECtHR rules that the statutory definition of family violates international law, it would trigger a massive constitutional standoff regarding whether the UK intends to remain a signatory to the convention.1]

LuckyHazelFox · 17/07/2026 20:06

EasternStandard · 17/07/2026 20:02

I think everyone would push for more family to join, it’s what Labour are trying to subvert because it’s not doable.

Labour MPs have just voted through much stricter family reunification policies, so if 18 people meet a right to family life it’ll be interesting to see if there’s a clash.

Looking up the process of what happens if there’s a clash it ended on this

4. The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR)
If domestic court avenues are exhausted, applicants can escalate cases to the international court in Strasbourg. If the ECtHR rules that the statutory definition of family violates international law, it would trigger a massive constitutional standoff regarding whether the UK intends to remain a signatory to the convention.1]

Will this be Burnham's first major project. He's handled a city let's see how he does handling the intricacies of leaving the ECHR to facilitate Mahmood's proposals. Obstacle number one coming his way. He will bottle it.

LuckyHazelFox · 17/07/2026 20:08

DuncinToffee · 17/07/2026 20:01

18, I am letting it sink in

Eighteen

11 children safe

Edited

I thought the UK was considered unsafe for refugees. It gets confusing keeping up.

DuncinToffee · 17/07/2026 20:09

EasternStandard · 17/07/2026 20:02

I think everyone would push for more family to join, it’s what Labour are trying to subvert because it’s not doable.

Labour MPs have just voted through much stricter family reunification policies, so if 18 people meet a right to family life it’ll be interesting to see if there’s a clash.

Looking up the process of what happens if there’s a clash it ended on this

4. The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR)
If domestic court avenues are exhausted, applicants can escalate cases to the international court in Strasbourg. If the ECtHR rules that the statutory definition of family violates international law, it would trigger a massive constitutional standoff regarding whether the UK intends to remain a signatory to the convention.1]

So you would leave the ECHR for that?

And hope that the rest of your right don't get erased?

For all means, campaign for modernisation of the ECHR, but don't say leave in a kneejerk reaction to a family reunion.

This case took almost 3 years

No precedent has been set.

EasternStandard · 17/07/2026 20:09

LuckyHazelFox · 17/07/2026 20:06

Will this be Burnham's first major project. He's handled a city let's see how he does handling the intricacies of leaving the ECHR to facilitate Mahmood's proposals. Obstacle number one coming his way. He will bottle it.

Edited

I don’t think Labour would, it’s a step too far. But let’s see. It’s a while off for the law to be put in place.

RodneyKitten · 17/07/2026 20:14

DuncinToffee · 17/07/2026 20:01

18, I am letting it sink in

Eighteen

11 children safe

Edited

How much is that going to cost the UK taxpayer?

Do you know?

Do you care?

EasternStandard · 17/07/2026 20:16

DuncinToffee · 17/07/2026 20:09

So you would leave the ECHR for that?

And hope that the rest of your right don't get erased?

For all means, campaign for modernisation of the ECHR, but don't say leave in a kneejerk reaction to a family reunion.

This case took almost 3 years

No precedent has been set.

We’ll see. Labour have voted on far stricter family reunification policies. I can’t see how right to family life is adhered to with that in place.

But it’s all slow and goes through courts, it may be a couple of years before a clash goes to Strasbourg.

ChunkyMonkey36 · 17/07/2026 20:19

RodneyKitten · 17/07/2026 20:14

How much is that going to cost the UK taxpayer?

Do you know?

Do you care?

Apparently our total asylum cost works out at around £125 per tax payer, per year.

I’m alright with that.

LuckyHazelFox · 17/07/2026 20:21

ChunkyMonkey36 · 17/07/2026 20:19

Apparently our total asylum cost works out at around £125 per tax payer, per year.

I’m alright with that.

That's nice for struggling British families to know. They don't get a choice.

DuncinToffee · 17/07/2026 20:23

RodneyKitten · 17/07/2026 20:14

How much is that going to cost the UK taxpayer?

Do you know?

Do you care?

I think we spent about £4b per year on asylum seeker but I don't know how much was spent on this family and I don't care. I wish them a safe, happy and healthy life.

£10b was wasted on PPE

ChunkyMonkey36 · 17/07/2026 20:24

LuckyHazelFox · 17/07/2026 20:21

That's nice for struggling British families to know. They don't get a choice.

Nobody gets a choice, do they?

Tax is paid, and spent as the sitting government requires/sees fit.

There is no directing what it’s spent on. For anyone.

Unless there is and I can start only contributing specifically to things that I want to?