Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to question no hosepipe ban exemption for people on benefits?

454 replies

Crosorbled · 14/07/2026 14:14

No hosepipe ban for people on benefits .

OP posts:
Backedoffhackedoff · 14/07/2026 17:06

EasternStandard · 14/07/2026 16:43

It does

Maybe you could help out and explain?

blacksax · 14/07/2026 17:06

Shit-stirring benefits-bashing. Again.

ColdAsAWitches · 14/07/2026 17:07

Filling a pool. it will take the exact same amount to fill using a bucket or hose unless you give up.

For a given value of "fill". If you have to hand fill it, you might decide you're happy for it to be an inch shallower. That could be a hundred litres less used.

JenniferBooth · 14/07/2026 17:07

Mespher · 14/07/2026 14:41

It’s not just disabled children it’s families with 3 school age children on benefits.

so not everyone on benefits then because you do know there are some ppl on benefits without kids who live in sweatbucket tiny flats and dont have a garden anyway.
And its called the Priority Services Register

OonaStubbs · 14/07/2026 17:08

The hosepipe ban should apply to everyone or no-one. There should be no exemption for those on benefits.

123teenagerfood · 14/07/2026 17:10

It is only a hosepipe ban though, you can still use water in a bucket etc to fill a pool, or water plants. Not sure anyone will be policing this though.

OneAmberFinch · 14/07/2026 17:12

123teenagerfood · 14/07/2026 17:10

It is only a hosepipe ban though, you can still use water in a bucket etc to fill a pool, or water plants. Not sure anyone will be policing this though.

Why don't they just do a higher tariff on high usage then...

You could still have exemptions for people who need lots of water for whatever reason.

JenniferBooth · 14/07/2026 17:12

glitterpaperchain · 14/07/2026 16:39

YABVU and so is everyone on this thread who is frothing at the mouth with vitriol towards people on benefits without actually finding out the real information.

https://www.lbc.co.uk/article/benefits-claimants-ignore-hosepipe-ban-amid-claims-of-two-tier-policy-5HjddZD_2/

Some people are just so bitter

Maybe ppl should see it as payback for poorer ppl who had to endure lockdowns and Covid restrictions Twasnt the poor who kept going on those ski trips in Feb/March 2020 when Covid was well known about and yet they had to endure the restrictions along with everyone else so if LBC want to discuss two tier,,,,,,,😑

ToffeeCrabApple · 14/07/2026 17:17

Silverbirchleaf · 14/07/2026 14:26

The headlines are misleading. It’s not automatically for everyone on benefits. It’s for those on the ‘Watersure scheme’.

So it’s people on certain benefits who need have a high demand for water, eg for medical needs or have three or more children, and have a water meter.

https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/consumer/water/problems-with-paying-your-water-bill/watersure-scheme-help-with-paying-water-bills/

Edited

Its quite abused. My friend is on this because her son has adhd. They have absolutely no need to use a hosepipe more than anyone else during a water shortage. One can only assume the water companies are deliberately relaxed about it to keep some revenue coming in while reducing usage overall - note that you have to be on a meter. They want to limit the people on standing charge as this reduces costs with no hit on their revenues.

BringBackCatsEyes · 14/07/2026 17:19

OonaStubbs · 14/07/2026 17:08

The hosepipe ban should apply to everyone or no-one. There should be no exemption for those on benefits.

Shame on you. How can you begrudge allowing people living in difficult circumstances (eg disability) to continue making their lives a little easier/safer.

AnonyMumAuDHD · 14/07/2026 17:23

On this basis I shall continue to water my lawn and my pollinators - my resident daughter is both a PIP recipient and a blue badge holder so we are exempt. I wasn’t going to make use of her exemption but, given my DH pays a six figure tax sum every year to subsidise all those benefits, spent a fortune in money and all his leisure time for years building and maintaining our garden, I am now of the fuck’em mindset.

XenoBitch · 14/07/2026 17:23

BringBackCatsEyes · 14/07/2026 17:19

Shame on you. How can you begrudge allowing people living in difficult circumstances (eg disability) to continue making their lives a little easier/safer.

I wouldn't take too much notice. They think that women should be sterilised before they are able to claim benefits.

BatsInHibernation · 14/07/2026 17:26

Ablondiebutagoody · 14/07/2026 14:28

Your job is to pay for their cushy lifestyle and keep your mouth shut. Anything else is at best unkind, at worst fascist.

Maybe seek out the facts? If you must proffer an opinion, make it an informed one.

TooBigForMyBoots · 14/07/2026 17:26

Has @Crosorbled come back yet?Hmm

Squirrelsarecleverbastards · 14/07/2026 17:28

JenniferBooth · 14/07/2026 17:12

Maybe ppl should see it as payback for poorer ppl who had to endure lockdowns and Covid restrictions Twasnt the poor who kept going on those ski trips in Feb/March 2020 when Covid was well known about and yet they had to endure the restrictions along with everyone else so if LBC want to discuss two tier,,,,,,,😑

Isn’t it time for you to move on from the lockdown?

MaturingCheeseball · 14/07/2026 17:28

Are posters in favour of those on the scheme being able to wash their cars with a hose?

JenniferBooth · 14/07/2026 17:31

Squirrelsarecleverbastards · 14/07/2026 17:28

Isn’t it time for you to move on from the lockdown?

Pretend it never happened. So we can forget about the sacrifices those on low incomes made and berate them for being on the Priority Services Register
Translated for you

Coconutter24 · 14/07/2026 17:33

Tryingtobenormal124 · 14/07/2026 14:20

Thats ridiculous. If you work your kids can't have a paddling pool filled with the hose, but if your sat at home all day and dont work, your kids can soak each other all day. Absurd and im not including disabled or those that can't work in my opinion.

Usually it’s first post nails it but this time it’s the exact opposite. Maybe do a bit of research before commenting on something you obviously know nothing about otherwise you end up looking stupid.
Your first mistake is assuming everyone on benefits doesn’t work and your second is assuming everyone on benefits has kids, like I say do some research and you’ll see there is a list of exemptions that are probably worth more than your opinion

ColdAsAWitches · 14/07/2026 17:42

AnonyMumAuDHD · 14/07/2026 17:23

On this basis I shall continue to water my lawn and my pollinators - my resident daughter is both a PIP recipient and a blue badge holder so we are exempt. I wasn’t going to make use of her exemption but, given my DH pays a six figure tax sum every year to subsidise all those benefits, spent a fortune in money and all his leisure time for years building and maintaining our garden, I am now of the fuck’em mindset.

You mean, on the basis of a factually incorrect OP, who repeated an equally incorrect, deliberately goady headline?

You're just as bad for believing it without reading even the first few posts that point out how it's nonsense.

MellowZebra · 14/07/2026 17:44

TooBigForMyBoots · 14/07/2026 17:26

Has @Crosorbled come back yet?Hmm

No. What a total surprise!

ilovesooty · 14/07/2026 17:44

Ablondiebutagoody · 14/07/2026 14:28

Your job is to pay for their cushy lifestyle and keep your mouth shut. Anything else is at best unkind, at worst fascist.

Don't be ridiculous.

Latenightreader · 14/07/2026 17:48

HomeEdInspiration · 14/07/2026 16:42

If there was a genuine water shortage they’d be rationing water, asking us to use less, halting new AI data centres etc etc. They are simply saying not to use a hosepipe. You can still fill a pool with a bucket and use the same amount of water as if you used a hose. It’s got people arguing over a ridiculous issue!

My water company is asking us to think carefully about the amount we use (ie use less) and to try not to waste water. We have also been sent suggestions about reusing greywater, not running the tap for ages and other avoidable things.

AnonyMumAuDHD · 14/07/2026 18:02

ColdAsAWitches · 14/07/2026 17:42

You mean, on the basis of a factually incorrect OP, who repeated an equally incorrect, deliberately goady headline?

You're just as bad for believing it without reading even the first few posts that point out how it's nonsense.

No actually - I checked it out on the actual websites, including my own water supplier (who has not implemented a ban yet). Like I say …. Our household is already exempt so compliance would be completely voluntary.

I am no longer willing to comply. 👍

Squirrelsarecleverbastards · 14/07/2026 18:03

JenniferBooth · 14/07/2026 17:31

Pretend it never happened. So we can forget about the sacrifices those on low incomes made and berate them for being on the Priority Services Register
Translated for you

I worked throughout the lockdowns.

You can thank me now.

And move on. I know I have.

toomanycoffeecups · 14/07/2026 18:11

youvemadeyourpoint · 14/07/2026 14:40

It’s becoming a joke. I think it’s time to get Labour out!

It’s time for you to do some reading comprehension lessons. The water companies are private. This isn’t anything to do with the government.

Swipe left for the next trending thread