Bonnie blue risky sexual behaviour whilst pregnant

[Jellysweets13]

If you’re not interested in discussing this then feel free to scroll on by.

A lot of us will know who Bonnie Blue is. The porn star who slept with 1000 men and various other stunts. Loves to rage bait especially to women.

She’s now pregnant, probably around 4-6 months.

If she’s to be believed she’s still working and filming and her latest stunt was to hold a baby shower in which she invited strangers to urinate over her and then have sex with her.

Obviously this has created a lot of outrage and disgust and there are comments everywhere online saying that she is not only sexualising her baby but that social services should be involved.

I’m not completely convinced that she actually doing these things for real. She has an X page showing clips, but it could all be fake or AI.

But let’s say for a moment that she really is having sex with strangers and letting them urinate on her. Where is the line drawn between her body her choice and saying that she’s putting the baby at risk and social services should be involved?

I’m very much usually of the opinion of women having autonomy and choice, but it seems like very risky behaviour and the child is going to have to endure a lot of negative comments and attention because of the choices the mother is making. She doesn’t need to do these things whilst pregnant she is a millionaire.

Yabu - her body her choice
Yanbu - it’s a social services case

Yes that's true

She's not pregnant, ffs everyone. It's a hoax. For MONEY. And publicity - like this thread.

Ha ha ha ha 😂...nothing surprises me anymore. The world is fucked.

I didnt know a social worker said that. Perhaps they need to think about another career. There must be laws about a parent putting a child in the path of physical harm.surely.

I agree 100%

There is no lengthy process from a “concern”. The reality is “safeguarding concern” doesn’t mean anything. It could mean a quick phone call to ask if she’s ok. It might not even mean that.

She will be an unfit mother. The child may well end up being abused. Any child born to her needs to be taken in to care immediately.

Do you not think it’s worth social services having on their radar a woman who has used the concept of the baby she is currently pregnant with as THE key theme of a pornographic film in which she asks men to urinate over her “pregnant body” (her words) and in the same film gets them to play games including putting nappy’s on children’s toys?

You don’t see the difference between the potential safeguarding risks of a woman doing that vs a woman who has sex when pregnant, which is a completely normal and healthy thing to do?

No while she's pregnant. The baby in the womb is a person.

There is no baby is actually a fetus which cannot consent as fetuses have no legal rights. Are you wanting them to have?

But OF COURSE she’s on their radar. Don’t you think thousands of people would’ve called social services about her after this stunt? Do you imagine no one thought of doing this?

Imagine that poor child in school - who is your mum? BB - the woman who slept with 165272628272 men. Play dates: probably 0 - but hey - as long as she’s making millions….her parents seem to benefit off it too…

I’d definitely be smirking if she had transitioned and it was a fake pregnancy, imagine all those men when the news broke. Classic.

I didn’t say the safeguarding concern automatically triggers a lengthy process. I asked if people felt it would be grounds to trigger further investigation or involvement. (No one ruled out it just being a phone call).

Maybe the keenness to be smug is getting in the way of reading comprehension for some posters on this thread.

Could you imagine? Bloody hilarious 😂 😃 😄

Most porn actors don’t centre their child in the ‘storyline’ of their porn by monetising their baby shower.

You don’t think that knowing their mum encouraged people to “piss all over my pregnant body then fuck me” while they were inside her stomach, with some of the men even rubbing her stomach, will be more emotionally damaging than ‘just’ being the child of a porn actor?

And in the modern world it’s highly likely the poor kid will see the content at some point.

It's not any different to women having sex with the father/ their husband. Literally no difference at all to the foetus.

I'm not at all a fan of hers and the complete opposite to her but I don't think she's doing anything wrong. Hugely distasteful yes. But if you believe in women's autonomy then there's no difference between her doing this pregnant or not.

I don't think she'll be having the baby over to pedos like some of you are suggesting. That's quite removed from what's she's doing.

What I found disturbing and I would hope a SW manager would, was the set up of a baby shower for the orgy. The baby food challenge would contain body fluids, the usual blindfolded 'put the dummy in the baby's mouth' game, would be 'put the dummy in the hole'. It's the not separating her job as a prostitute/porn star from her pregnancy/home life. The risky sexial behaviourdoes put the baby at significant harm. It definitely crosses the threshold for a pre birth meeting, a proposed CP plan and meetings with BB.

She’s saying “piss all over my pregnant body then fuck me” in the promo videos. You don’t think that is a form of degradation? You don’t think the men who want to “piss all over” a pregnant woman are degrading them?

Women smoking are probably causing more damage to their babies. That's completely a choice and no one is suggesting they're unfit mothers.

Exactly. Im not a lawyer but I would argue that dhe has created a context in which the baby has been asdigned a role....otherwise the sensationalism of the scenario doesnt work......and the baby is non consenting in that scenatiob thetefore she had put it in a situation agsinst its eill and that is surely child abuse.

Sadly, given the high number of pervs out there, there is quite a bit of pregnancy porn, so other porn actresses are doing the same (albeit they're not as famous in their own right). Many of them will also do really gross stuff that would humiliate and embarrass any child who made that discovery about their parent. But that wouldn't warrant removal.

Pity the child, I can imagine issues when they eventually find out.

@TheStepboardisfullofbitteroddos you don't understand risky sexual behaviour? The fact that she is having sex with men who also indulge in risky sexual behaviour? You honestly see no difference between being in a relationship and going into a room with dozens of men, who are happy to use a woman as a piece of meat, while heavily pregnant?

They shouldn't be mothers. Jesus fucking christ.