AIBU? Is this disgusting or am I just old-fashioned?!

[Namerchangee]

https://www.nottinghampost.com/news/nottingham-news/adult-star-who-slept-hundreds-9570473

I’m no prude but there’s just something about this that has disgusted me.

Think you’re on the wrong thread personally..

She may have had 5000 enquiries (which I doubt)

She's offering free sex. I'm surprised she's only had 5000 responses tbh.

Either way, it's grim (even though it's rather reflective of the hyper-sexualised OF porn-soaked world many seem to think is progressive and pro-feminist.

I am very worried about the standard of elections too. I find myself politically homeless but that’s possibly for another thread!

I suspect someone might get their rocks off with a text or two for fantasy value. Whether they’d be willing to stand in a well publicised queue for a shag is a different matter. I’d hope not but I’m regularly disappointed by people. I still struggle to believe people voted for brexit tbh.

Isn't soliciting illegal? Or is she not charging only filming and uploading to her only fans?

I can't lie it's so grim. If my 18 year old was heading off to uni and a predatory sex worker was targeting their uni id not be happy!

Can you describe what it is about her and her behavior that is predatory?

By posing outside of a university saying she wants to have sex with 18 year old boys? Film it and put on her sex channel? Christ. The implications for these boys in the future having featured on her sex channel when they are at vulnerable age...

I understand she has said the identities of the men will be concealed in the films.
I'm not saying I don't find it distasteful but I can't see that she is exploiting these men. She isn't tricking them, they are not being forced or coerced or bribed, they know exactly what is involved.

Might be the targeting of a specific group? Do any of you have just turned 18 year olds?

Does she have to though?

If you mean does she have to conceal their identities then I'm guessing there is a contract which both parties have to sign and the terms of which they will therefore be bound by.

Does she have to though?

I think it depends on what they agree to .

But I'll throw that back at you. Do these men/young men have to have sex with her?

Funny how when a topic is about porn, women involved are always the victim. This shows some women are happy to do stuff like this (not obviously all women in the porn industry, but MN talk like all women have no choice!)

Is your 18 year old the type to queue up to have sex with women on film?

That's grim and sordid

She says "so that uni students and husbands can queue" !!

She's a provocateur, drumming up interest - and it's worked.

Bingo!

Agree,,She isn't even very attractive. Such a narrow face. Silly woman

Well, yes. They would be wouldn't they? Using her for sex. And if 5000 18 year old women their mums and aunties queued up for sex with a male porn star they would also be using him for sex and i dare say would be strongly criticised for it also. But that hasnt happened and I'd be very surprised if it ever did. So Where is the double standard?

Your post, and all the others of the same ilk, just show fear, Viviennemary. This woman - by your standards - not attractive with a narrow face... yet so much male interest.

How about these grimy men just not go there? Is that an option, do you think?

@5128gap Well, yes. They would be wouldn't they? Using her for sex.

So again, if an extremely handsome man put out on advert for female students to have sex with him for him to upload to his onlyfans where he could profit immensely (while the students don't earn a penny, of course), not a single person would say that the female students were "using" the handsome man.

So why do you have this double standard?

I don’t have fear. I’m just sick of the normalisation of porn as if it’s all just a jolly larf. It’s not, it’s degrading our society.

If you'd quoted me in full you'd see that I clearly stated that if 5000 women were queuing for sex with a male porn star they would be using him for sex and would be criticised, exactly the same. Do you remember reading that part? So, again, what double standard?