Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

… to ask why Giles Coren hasn’t been cancelled yet?

999 replies

mowly77 · 20/07/2021 22:05

The vile Dawn Foster tweets ffs. But he seems Teflon coated. He will never be cancelled. Three fucking columns a week … a pissing radio show, albeit on Times Radio, which surely no one listens to. I would love to be proved wrong. Absolutely love to be.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
10
Bryonyshcmyony · 22/07/2021 10:24

@Darkchocolateandcoffee

No one gets cancelled at The Times.

See also India Knight.

A few of this type of comment

The reply to why should Ik be cancelled? Links to her partners crimes.

RufustheBadgeringReindeer · 22/07/2021 10:24

Probably best off asking those posters

But there have been other threads www.mumsnet.com/Talk/am_i_being_unreasonable/4224157-India-Knight

It quite obviously isn’t her fault her husband is a disgusting human being…no one has said it is her fault

Blossomtoes · 22/07/2021 10:24

@Bryonyshcmyony

Yes and blaming India Knight for what her dh did. Pathetic
Nobody’s blamed her for what he did. Condoning it by giving evidence for him in court and continuing to live with him - hell yes, I’m judging her.
Bryonyshcmyony · 22/07/2021 10:25

@RufustheBadgeringReindeer

Probably best off asking those posters

But there have been other threads www.mumsnet.com/Talk/am_i_being_unreasonable/4224157-India-Knight

It quite obviously isn’t her fault her husband is a disgusting human being…no one has said it is her fault

But happy to want her "cancelled"? And therefore deprive her of her own living? Shameful
RufustheBadgeringReindeer · 22/07/2021 10:28

Just to clarify ive made no comment on India Knight about ‘cancelling’ her or not

Bryonyshcmyony · 22/07/2021 10:29

@RufustheBadgeringReindeer

Just to clarify ive made no comment on India Knight about ‘cancelling’ her or not
No I wasn't meaning you specifically @RufustheBadgeringReindeer
SnakeyTakey · 22/07/2021 10:32

India Knight's decision entirely if she wants to remain in a relationship with a convicted paedophile. But for a woman who's made a career on advising people how to live their lives, it's hardly surprising if a chunk of her readership no longer wish to read her advice.

EishetChayil · 22/07/2021 10:35

Apparently Giles' house has been "daubed" in dog mess and pro-Dawn slogans.

What a time to be alive, honestly.

MissLucyEyelesbarrow · 22/07/2021 10:38

@EishetChayil

Apparently Giles' house has been "daubed" in dog mess and pro-Dawn slogans.

What a time to be alive, honestly.

Probably by one of Giles's avatars.
MissLucyEyelesbarrow · 22/07/2021 10:40

@SnakeyTakey

India Knight's decision entirely if she wants to remain in a relationship with a convicted paedophile. But for a woman who's made a career on advising people how to live their lives, it's hardly surprising if a chunk of her readership no longer wish to read her advice.
Her child, who has additional needs, also lives with the man in question. I think that's what people primarily object to. She'll never be cancelled though, because her stepfather is a senior Times executive.
southeastdweller · 22/07/2021 10:42

@SnakeyTakey

India Knight's decision entirely if she wants to remain in a relationship with a convicted paedophile. But for a woman who's made a career on advising people how to live their lives, it's hardly surprising if a chunk of her readership no longer wish to read her advice.
Their relationship was used as mitigation in his court case, which she presumably allowed. That’s beyond the pale.
SnakeyTakey · 22/07/2021 10:43

I think I read that her daughter now lives with IK's ex husband (and the child's father), the novelist Andrew O'Hagan. Which is no doubt for the best. But imagine choosing your paedophile partner over your own child. Yech.

Clymene · 22/07/2021 10:44

@SnakeyTakey

I think I read that her daughter now lives with IK's ex husband (and the child's father), the novelist Andrew O'Hagan. Which is no doubt for the best. But imagine choosing your paedophile partner over your own child. Yech.
Yes, that's my understanding too.
Bryonyshcmyony · 22/07/2021 10:46

Christ. Luckily all of the posters on here can hide behind aliases.

SnakeyTakey · 22/07/2021 10:49

@Bryonyshcmyony

Christ. Luckily all of the posters on here can hide behind aliases.
For stating facts? Confused

Are you annoyed that people are now cancelling paedophiles?

NeverDropYourMooncup · 22/07/2021 10:50

@Bryonyshcmyony

Yes and blaming India Knight for what her dh did. Pathetic
Making jokes about using him as a hired thug to intimidate others (along the lines of 'I can send him round to sort them out/threaten/attack them') is utterly her responsibility, though. And makes it pretty clear she doesn't have a problem with any of his behaviour.
Bryonyshcmyony · 22/07/2021 10:51

India Knight is not a paedophile @snakeytakey

longwayoff · 22/07/2021 10:55

No, she's a paedophile's partner. Parents find it unacceptable understandably.

SnakeyTakey · 22/07/2021 10:58

@Bryonyshcmyony

India Knight is not a paedophile *@snakeytakey*
No but you seem irritated at any criticism aimed at her or her partner.

By remaining with him, choosing him over her daughter, fully supporting him in court she's tacitly condoning his behaviour. You can chill out though, her professional life is unable to change, as a pp mentioned her stepfather is the director of News Corp. So all will remain rosy in her financial garden.

Blossomtoes · 22/07/2021 11:02

@Bryonyshcmyony

Christ. Luckily all of the posters on here can hide behind aliases.
Why? There hasn’t been a single post that isn’t purely factual.
Bryonyshcmyony · 22/07/2021 11:13

@longwayoff

No, she's a paedophile's partner. Parents find it unacceptable understandably.
That is not the same as being a paedophile and well you know it, so an apology is in order @SnakeyTakey
Blossomtoes · 22/07/2021 11:15

Jesus, are you one of her Twitterati mates @Bryonyshcmyony?

Bryonyshcmyony · 22/07/2021 11:17

No, just correcting a PP ssaying that I was objecting to cancelling paedophiles, and as this thread isn't about cancelling paedophiles - as neither IK or GC are peaodophiles AFAIK - she's just making stuff up.

SnakeyTakey · 22/07/2021 11:17

Apologise for what?

Bryonyshcmyony · 22/07/2021 11:19

Are you annoyed that people are now cancelling paedophiles?

I am not annoyed that people are cancelling paedophiles, as neither GC or IK are paedophiles

Stop trying to make stuff up to smear posters who don't agree with you.