Is he retracting his claim that Trump’s inauguration was the largest crowd ever in person?
That’s not what I said, says Spicer.
Did you mean in person and around the globe?
I meant total audence; both in persona nda round the globe, says Spicer.
You’re saying both together?
“That’s literally what I said ... I don’t know how you can interpret it differently.”
You’re not saying in person?
“I am not. I am saying it was the total largest audience witnessed in person and around the globe.”
His original quote in full from Saturday was:
Inaccurate numbers involving crowd size were also tweeted. No one had numbers, because the National Park Service, which controls the National Mall, does not put any out. By the way, this applies to any attempts to try to count the number of protestors today in the same fashion.
We do know a few things, so let’s go through the facts. We know that from the platform where the President was sworn in, to 4th Street, it holds about 250,000 people. From 4th Street to the media tent is about another 220,000. And from the media tent to the Washington Monument, another 250,000 people. All of this space was full when the President took the Oath of Office. We know that 420,000 people used the D.C. Metro public transit yesterday, which actually compares to 317,000 that used it for President Obama’s last inaugural. This was the largest audience to ever witness an inauguration <span class="line-through"> period </span> both in person and around the globe. Even the New York Times printed a photograph showing a misrepresentation of the crowd in the original Tweet in their paper, which showed the full extent of the support, depth in crowd, and intensity that existed.
So why go on about the CROWD size when he apparently was talking about the audience size? Why make a point about it in the briefing and the CIA?
And..who had the biggest audience at the actual inaugaration? Obama in 2009 or Trump in 2017?
But apparently statistics and numbers don't matter to Trump 