Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Wild expectations of grandparents

435 replies

Morningtee · 05/09/2026 09:30

Just reading an article from the I paper called ‘the do’s and don’ts of grand parenting as children go back to school’ I’m sure the article was written with well meaning intent but as a Gen X I’m just increasingly shocked at some of today’s young parents expectations of grandparent role. Even a paid childminder wouldn’t put up with some of the advice in the article. I had a great relationship with my grandparents but they didn’t play the role that seems to be expected of modern grandparents which seems more about serving the needs of entitled millennial/Gen Z parents than the grandchildren. Indeed a number are quite happy to destroy the entire relationship between grandchild and grandparent if their wild expectations are not met

OP posts:
HeyMoonPie · 06/09/2026 07:21

Beepalarm · 05/09/2026 10:14

Your family didn’t have a washing machine? When was this?

Good God ! - The Op has made such a valid point re the 'Boomers' NOT all living in some money soaked world. In fact i would say that back then and we were taught if you wanted something you saved and you saved (Not put it all on credit cards and think that nails and tattoos and the latest mobile are the essentials of life!) A lot of houses didn't have washing machines - people used laundrettes! 🙄

Hairsnakes · 06/09/2026 07:22

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

ArtieChoke · 06/09/2026 07:24

EvieBB · 05/09/2026 23:06

Some grandparents actually enjoy spending time with their granchildren (that is part of the joy of retirement!)

There is a difference between being a childminder, and having time to spend with your grandchildren.

looking after your grandchildren for 2/3 days a week becomes a job.

having a grandchild for a day or an afternoon adhoc is not a job

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about this subject:

Hairsnakes · 06/09/2026 07:28

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

FirmSnake · 06/09/2026 07:29

HeyMoonPie · 06/09/2026 07:21

Good God ! - The Op has made such a valid point re the 'Boomers' NOT all living in some money soaked world. In fact i would say that back then and we were taught if you wanted something you saved and you saved (Not put it all on credit cards and think that nails and tattoos and the latest mobile are the essentials of life!) A lot of houses didn't have washing machines - people used laundrettes! 🙄

I'm not sure this is really true though. Plenty of households had stuff "on the tick", when I was growing up there were rental shops on every high street. Radio Rentals that became Brighthouse I believe. Hundreds of shops throughout the country just for renting furniture, appliances and electronics.

Hairsnakes · 06/09/2026 07:40

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Differentforgirls · 06/09/2026 07:50

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

So you keep saying...

AquamarinePearlGold · 06/09/2026 07:58

Morningtee · 05/09/2026 10:41

I think there is some truth in that, to our boomer parents we were the most special things in the world but they were careful about making us think we were the most special things in the world. However I think my generation of parents have just wanted to make their children feel like the most special thing in the world, our lives revolve around them and we’re always there for them etc but yes maybe are then surprised they’ve actually internalised that. Despite that it’s ironic this generation of young adults seem less happy overall

But where’s the article op?

Boomer55 · 06/09/2026 08:02

Morningtee · 05/09/2026 09:30

Just reading an article from the I paper called ‘the do’s and don’ts of grand parenting as children go back to school’ I’m sure the article was written with well meaning intent but as a Gen X I’m just increasingly shocked at some of today’s young parents expectations of grandparent role. Even a paid childminder wouldn’t put up with some of the advice in the article. I had a great relationship with my grandparents but they didn’t play the role that seems to be expected of modern grandparents which seems more about serving the needs of entitled millennial/Gen Z parents than the grandchildren. Indeed a number are quite happy to destroy the entire relationship between grandchild and grandparent if their wild expectations are not met

Luckily, we can say no. I would and did. 👍

Catsandcwtches · 06/09/2026 08:23

It’s very true life in the past has been hard for many. I don’t see how that relates to millennials and Gen Z parents having entitled expectations of grandparents though? Where is the proof of that beyond this one article?

Hairsnakes · 06/09/2026 08:23

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Hairsnakes · 06/09/2026 08:23

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Scissor · 06/09/2026 08:30

Beepalarm · 05/09/2026 10:14

Your family didn’t have a washing machine? When was this?

90% of UK households have a washing machine today. That's why launderettes exist! That's 1 in 10 households with no washing machine in 2026.

Morningtee · 06/09/2026 08:55

Scissor · 06/09/2026 08:30

90% of UK households have a washing machine today. That's why launderettes exist! That's 1 in 10 households with no washing machine in 2026.

Yes I just noticed one of those automated outdoor laundrettes pop up near us

OP posts:
Morningtee · 06/09/2026 08:56

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

I’ve given the title of article and paper it was in, just google it

OP posts:
Morningtee · 06/09/2026 09:02

Catsandcwtches · 06/09/2026 08:23

It’s very true life in the past has been hard for many. I don’t see how that relates to millennials and Gen Z parents having entitled expectations of grandparents though? Where is the proof of that beyond this one article?

Already had someone say they thought me visiting my grandchildren who live 3 hours away 3-4 times a year, happily having them here when they come to visit and phone calls etc was ‘minimal involvement’ yet that was a similar level of involvement I had with my GP and didn’t consider it minimal at all, we were both very much in each others thoughts and when we did meet up it was extra special. They lived quite far away, obviously if they had lived around the corner you would naturally see them more. Grandparents aren’t duty bound to be a defacto 3rd parent, if that’s what works for that family, maybe GP wanting another crack at being involved in raising children and parents really wanting the help than go for it but they shouldn’t be made to feel like they’re not good GP if their world doesn’t revolve around the GC

OP posts:
Morningtee · 06/09/2026 09:05

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

I had £30 for all food, nappies etc, no sofa, no cooker, no tumble drier for the first 6 months, thank goodness I did have a washing machine, we didn’t even have a TV as I couldn’t afford the licence, all my money went in rent and childcare, I visit young families all the time and I have not seen any of them live in that level of poverty

OP posts:
Catsandcwtches · 06/09/2026 09:09

Morningtee · 06/09/2026 09:02

Already had someone say they thought me visiting my grandchildren who live 3 hours away 3-4 times a year, happily having them here when they come to visit and phone calls etc was ‘minimal involvement’ yet that was a similar level of involvement I had with my GP and didn’t consider it minimal at all, we were both very much in each others thoughts and when we did meet up it was extra special. They lived quite far away, obviously if they had lived around the corner you would naturally see them more. Grandparents aren’t duty bound to be a defacto 3rd parent, if that’s what works for that family, maybe GP wanting another crack at being involved in raising children and parents really wanting the help than go for it but they shouldn’t be made to feel like they’re not good GP if their world doesn’t revolve around the GC

That seems like normal involvement to me (and is far more than my parents have had with my kids. My kids don’t recognise my parents in photos or know who they are)

You say your own children have not made any demands of you to be more involved though.

Morningtee · 06/09/2026 09:12

Boomer55 · 06/09/2026 08:02

Luckily, we can say no. I would and did. 👍

Good, I think there does need to be a push back from GP with these expectations, (again where it works for both parties or a little help makes a massive difference to your DC family and you’re really wanting to help as most of us would then that’s different) but DC slagging off GP, alienating the GC and going. No/low contact for not meeting silly expectations isn’t on and the more GP that get emotionally blackmailed the worse it is for other GP. They should not be treated like a non resident father who doesn’t see his children enough. No GP should be providing childcare when they absolutely don’t want to when the DC are affording family holidays, the latest phones etc

OP posts:
SlugJam · 06/09/2026 09:13

My in laws live abroad, 8 hours door to door and we see them more than 3-4 times a year.

Morningtee · 06/09/2026 09:23

FirmSnake · 06/09/2026 07:29

I'm not sure this is really true though. Plenty of households had stuff "on the tick", when I was growing up there were rental shops on every high street. Radio Rentals that became Brighthouse I believe. Hundreds of shops throughout the country just for renting furniture, appliances and electronics.

There was a huge stigma to using such places, you’ve got to remember the consequences of debt, workhouses etc ( not just an unpleasant jaunt but where your baby had a high risk of dying due to to disease and poor nutrition if your family was unlucky enough to be admitted was within living memory of the older relatives) top up benefits were nothing like what they are today (I say that through lived experience, I thought I was a millionaire when tax credits were bought in around 2001 as they were amazingly more generous than the previous system) In the 1970/80s they were even less generous. People generally went without if they couldn’t afford something, my GP would buy me a nice coat and then my mum would give it to one of my less well off school friends when I’d grown out of it, a child who literally wouldn’t have had a decent coat if she hadn’t, there wasn’t any market place/freecycle in those days, yes charity shops but you would be pot luck to go in and find a coat for your child in their size, cheap fashion didn’t exist

OP posts:
FirmSnake · 06/09/2026 09:26

Morningtee · 06/09/2026 09:23

There was a huge stigma to using such places, you’ve got to remember the consequences of debt, workhouses etc ( not just an unpleasant jaunt but where your baby had a high risk of dying due to to disease and poor nutrition if your family was unlucky enough to be admitted was within living memory of the older relatives) top up benefits were nothing like what they are today (I say that through lived experience, I thought I was a millionaire when tax credits were bought in around 2001 as they were amazingly more generous than the previous system) In the 1970/80s they were even less generous. People generally went without if they couldn’t afford something, my GP would buy me a nice coat and then my mum would give it to one of my less well off school friends when I’d grown out of it, a child who literally wouldn’t have had a decent coat if she hadn’t, there wasn’t any market place/freecycle in those days, yes charity shops but you would be pot luck to go in and find a coat for your child in their size, cheap fashion didn’t exist

Edited

There might well have been stigma. But they existed so therefore it is absolutely not true to say "boomers saved for everything" and went without if they couldn't afford something. Both things cannot be true.

Morningtee · 06/09/2026 09:27

SlugJam · 06/09/2026 09:13

My in laws live abroad, 8 hours door to door and we see them more than 3-4 times a year.

So are they also raising young children, working and have to decide between things like treats for their own children, swimming lessons etc and paying the cost of travelling to see you, everyone’s circumstances are different and to imply GP have a duty to be more involved basically says they should make it their priority, why?? Yes I do feel sad for parents who say their parents show no interest in the GC but that’s very different to going to visit them a few times a year, hosting them, buying birthday and Christmas presents, ringing them on special days etc

OP posts:
Morningtee · 06/09/2026 09:33

FirmSnake · 06/09/2026 09:26

There might well have been stigma. But they existed so therefore it is absolutely not true to say "boomers saved for everything" and went without if they couldn't afford something. Both things cannot be true.

The equivalent I can give you is we all know people who are on minimum wage in an agency job and buy brand new cars they’re bought on credit and yet the next year it’s not unusual they have an IVA/ go through bankruptcy, so in 30 years time you say it was easy for anyone to buy a brand new car in 2026. Although the difference today is there is a much better welfare state so the.safety net for people is much better so they can afford to make mistakes, for many people it would of been foolhardy to use such places back then

OP posts:
Morningtee · 06/09/2026 09:39

EvieBB · 05/09/2026 23:06

Some grandparents actually enjoy spending time with their granchildren (that is part of the joy of retirement!)

Just like some people enjoy helping out with the local scout group, running, cooking etc, everyone and their circumstances are different. As a parent you do have a duty to be significantly involved in your child’s life, obviously, no one else had the responsibility to do so, so if you don’t the child inevitably suffers. However thay moral duty shouldn’t extend to other relatives beyond helping in emergencies and showing some interest around the GC just like you would do if a baby said hello in a supermarket, it wouldn’t be nice to ignore them

OP posts:
Swipe left for the next trending thread