Name a better trio than Onion, Garlic & Ginger - Trump Thread #155

[Spandauer]

Blood clot, Announcement, Champagne.

(Shamelessly stolen from @Justsaynonow 's
post on the last thread)

Previous thread:
https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/_chat/5482659-whatever-atrocity-is-next-trump-thread-154

We can only hope that he goes the same way as all the other people Trump has recently endorsed.

I can see reforms biggest task in the next election desperately avoiding any endorsement by the Orange losing machine. Who knows, we may yet hear Nigel Farage say "Donald who ?" ....

There is definite crossover in the Venn Diagram.

🤐🤐🤐

Except by existing at all, perhaps.

Did you happen to do today’s Wordle?

I did

whoops - missed it being posted. It resonated with me as well.

Bless his heart - poor deluded soul. He can add the restitution cheque to his DOGE cheque.

eta - not sure whether it's me or MN having the issues. The quote disappeared.

This reddit thread contains (in the OP) links to a database complied from the Epstein files:
https://www.reddit.com/r/Epstein/comments/1r3joqr/i_mapped_every_connection_in_the_epstein_files_it/

"The database
Everything is at EpsteinExposed.com. Free. No ads. No paywall.
You can browse without logging in. Accounts are only for making dossiers and posting notes.
There’s also a community forum for collab research: board.epsteinexposed.com
If you find errors, call them out. If you want a specific thread turned into a dossier, say the name and I’ll help you get it set up.
TL;DR
The database went from ~6k docs to 1.5M in a week. Full text searchable. We ran redaction analysis at scale, flagged a huge pile for human review, recovered a lot of hidden text, and the current Congress/DOJ redaction fight is now fully indexed in the same place."

Me too.

I still have the Ashley Madison database somewhere. And the ACS:Law one too ...

😁😁 Good one!

Took me 3.
ALONE
CROOK
Then the correct guess.

Bloody hell its like something out of Putin’s Russia.

He missed out high buildings :-)

So, the reason why the media is not talking about Trump's involvement with Epstein (he was mentioned 38,000 times in the Epstein files) is because he will litigate.
That is what the US is reduced to. The POTUS can do what he wants because of threats.
www.thenewsagents.co.uk/article/the-simple-reason-the-media-isnt-talking-about-trump-in-the-epstein-files-5HjdRn9_2/

Good speech by Rubio. Surprisingly.

Get you away from this thread... you turncoat you !

:-)

But seriously, many of these folk are really smart. Trump has a way of bringing out the inner child in them.

So, if Rubio done a good speech, that means Trump will have to criticise it, and Rubio will need to do a self reflexion/ self criticism.

He skipped the Ukraine meeting with European leaders in order to be able to travel to Budapest to see Viktor Orban.

3 for me too. It sort of leapt out😄

One of my DC's very first jobs out of university was for the PR firm hired to rehabilitate Ashley Madison's reputation. They very quickly decided PR was not the career path for them. Which we had suspected, but the real world experience taught that in a way a parental warning never would.

A lawyer speaks - Trump v. BBC looks set to require Trump to have to give evidence under oath

I haven't listened to it yet, but everything I'm reading says it was awful.

https://phillipspobrien.substack.com/p/rubio-calls-for-the-end-of-a-tolerant?r=1tgexa&utm_medium=ios&triedRedirect=true

This piece pretty much sums up what I've read so far. I'm going to try to listen to it when I have a bit of time later.

Do listen to it, in full.

It seems so unfair that MAGAnauts can get someone to read them a headline and that's them set for life. but decent folk are required to read every word in an article before their views are considered.

I've read this several times and don't understand you.