@Piony it is. I'm writing up some questions for parents evening because the more I think about it, the more confused I am.
What she said yesterday is that it's a circular table, all the kids are sat round it. It was at this table both instances occurred. It's tight and it's cramped in, so 10 kids, I'm assuming the 5-6 adults aren't next to each child because I've seen the classroom size and it's not big enough for a table that could seat 10 children and 5 adults.
His EHCP review has been sent off and they've agreed to amend it so I'm waiting for the draft and I'm compiling all of my questions about suitability of placement.
It sounds like the environment isn't suitable for many of the children given it is so small, and even if the dysregulation doesn't lead to targeted behaviours towards other staff and pupils, proximity is an issue and it's caused 2 consecutive days of unintended harm, close to the eyes.
I know DS isn't perfect and has his own behaviours but they accepted him into this school, offered him a place knowing needing personal space and space to move was a big deal for him because proximity is a big trigger for him. It's why a lot of consulted schools said they couldn't accomodate him and all of them were much bigger than this one. I'm surprised on both accounts he hasn't retaliated but I think it's a matter of when, not if, should this continue.
I also know that they're classing these 2 incidents as accidents, and they said it was unpredictable, but I disagree in premise because whilst they can't anticipate every child's actions they do know they have very little space to work with and I think putting a large round table in the middle that takes up most of the free flowing space creates a very anticipatory risk of proximity based injuries.
They've said before that the aim of the round table is to provide a communal eating setting as they use lunchtimes to promote social inclusion and interaction which sounds nice on paper, but it's definitely making DS retreat. And it could absolutely just be a coincidence that DS has been injured 2 days in a row but I'm aware that every single child in that classroom is there because they have very specific needs that can't be accomodated elsewhere and that will include unpredictable behaviours so if DS is the first child to be injured by this set up which I doubt, he also certainly won't be the last.