Nathaniel Knight (partner of Aimee Challenor); worrying twitter admissions(194 Posts)
MNHQ have commented on this thread.
Recently spotted on Twitter and reported today
This is Aimee Challenor’s partner. This needs reported (to the police preferably).
Bunifosh is posting inresponse to a thread started by Nathaniel Knight @ kharonalpua (Aimees’ partner)
Nathaniels’ post was because poster Whistleblower11097 posted on a current MN thread - www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3635063-Challenor-on-LBC-this-morning?msgid=88567343
That post as been deleted
The content highlighted by bunifosh is worrying, but of greater concern is the thread from Nathaniel as it’s direct from the horses mouth, and admits to child rape fantasies, inappropriate communication with a minor, etc.
Aimee Challenor (from wiki)
Aimee Challenor (born 1 October 1997) is a British politician and transgender activist and former spokesperson for the Green Party of England and Wales. In 2017, she stood for election in Coventry South, receiving 1.3% of the votes. In 2018, her father, who had been serving as her election agent, was convicted and jailed for sexual offences against a child, leading to Challenor's suspension from the party during an investigation. She later resigned and is currently a member of the Liberal Democrats.
Aimee has been dragged into this as Nathaniel tweeted in the above linked thread
“So how can @ AimeeChallenor work with vulnerable teenagers when she's in a relationship with me? I don't have a violent bone in my body, and I have no interest in real children. In more than half of my lifetime, I have not "graduated" from a fetish for fantasy children to...”
The optics are not good for Aimee or the Liberal Democrats.
Wow. They're so sure that they're untouchable, aren't they?
2019 seems to be the year where the absolute dregs of human sexuality decide to simply brazen out their perversion and demand acceptance regardless of potential harms.
From puppy play Pride to "what's wrong with writing many stories with the intent to titillate about child rape, sounds like good creativity to me!", we're now at the very threshold of grown men being able to walk around with child "boyfriends"/"girlfriends" and be defended by the woke.
They'll use the same arguments as PIE et al did in the 1970s. The argument goes: agency of children means they should be able to consent to sexual relations, and if you try to separate a child from their adult lover, you're removing the child's agency and have actually been the abusive one.
DARVO is about to go that far. I'm calling it now. Within 12 months we will see pieces in major LGBT or general circulation publications opining that the real child abusers are the parents who shelter their children from sexuality until the teen years, and "minor-attracted people" are providing valuable sexuality education and helping children break free of repressive old-fashioned morality.
The pieces are now all in place. Articles about kind, gentle "minor-attracted people" have come out in major publications. Actively and publicly fantasizing about sex with minors is now supposedly fine as long as it's "fanfiction" and your would-be rape victims were also in Harry Potter or similar. Children are being told it's fine and dandy to watch sexual performances and even engage in them, or to crawl all over a smiling stranger's groin. Children's agency must now be respected by medical practitioners even to the point of keeping secrets from parents, but the only medical secrets children may keep are sexual ones.
If these last few brazen moves by edge case trans people and kink people are accepted with little or no pushback (and I mean something far more intense than some angry tweeting or mumsnet threads!), there is absolutely nothing stopping the next step in the progression.
This is it, folks. You're about to start seeing actual out-and-out pedophilia advocacy, complete with callbacks to how beautiful Greek pederasty was and how pedophiles are actually wonderful, giving people who give children their first sexual experiences in a loving way, and are actually quite noble for simply moving on to the next
victim lover once the current one gets too old. I'm placing a fiver on the phrase "when you love something, set it free" appearing in some form.
Holy crap. That's about all I can muster at this time of the morning.
That and I hope someone's archived all of this.
Can you screenshot the twitter and put it on here?
There are 4 screen shots from Nathaniel, I can only attach 3 here, I'll try and post the last one on the next message but I think there maybe an image post limit.
From twitter https://mobile.twitter.com/kharonalpua/status/1150825592562081793
I agree with womb this is horrific. It's the systematic trampling of boundaries to pave the way for greater abuses playing out right before our eyes.
Last image from twitter https://mobile.twitter.com/kharonalpua/status/1150825592562081793
This shows the complete thread.
The responses are not at all positive, and I'm not really sure why Nathaniel posted, or what he (pic looks male, no preferred pronouns on bio) hopes to achieve.
As I said on the original thread (https://www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3635063-Challenor-on-LBC-this-morning?msgid=88567343)
"I have started a thread.... I hope I've kept it factual enough that it doesn't get deleted, I'm pretty sure I've not misgendered, and I've added no real personal thought. We'll see I guess."
I will keep a copy of my OP and the screenshots so if MN do decide this thread should be deleted as outside mod rules, it can be re-worded to not upset guidelines.
"I will not engage in any sexual interaction without consent from a person with a mature mind and understanding of sex"
So... a child with a mind he considers to be mature with an understanding of sex would be ok? Because he doesn't explicitly say " with an adult" does he?
Anyone know how we can report this guy? As he's in the US, there must be a way to note this to a police official, Twatter isn't going to care.
Any Americans on here who can advise?
It this actually real? It ready like some dodgy creative writing.
Done to Whistleblower on this one. It's prompted his outrageous response. I'm sure he thinks that being open about his "fantasies" is a wise move. It is not a wise move. We see you Nathaniel. You flashed at us fella.
Hiding in plain sight. Jimmy Savile lives on in the House of Commons.
Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.
He is American I think
He has been reported to ceop
Holy Fuck. This has to be followed up and investigated.
Stop lauding AC and their coterie as special and see them for who they are.
LordProfFekko re Is this actually real? It ready like some dodgy creative writing.
I've only posted screenshots from Nathaniel's twitter, his history looks legit, I recognise him from previous Aimee threads, he's linked this to Aimee himself (I can't see anything from Aimee to distance), and I've seen other tweets and around this.
Also unless Nathaniel is also poster Whistleblower11097 who posted on a current MN thread - https://www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3635063-Challenor-on-LBC-this-morning?msgid=88567343 (post now deleted) and then started a twitter thread to refute the 'bad guy now' image I'm fairly confident this is (sadly) real.
What is it in these peoples psyche? The blatant attention seeking - no matter how gross and ugly. There is definitely a ‘type’ isn’t there.
Who would be the person in th Lib Dems to flag this up to?
Cos, it's deeply, deeply worrying.
I have no words.
And his snide comment about whistleblower staying anonymous has made me quite angry. Yes, we live in a world where people are proud to announce their paedophilia but it's dangerous for women to denounce them.
I feel sick.
I didn't realise Aimee and her dad set up terf blocker!
The LibDems don’t have the balls to pull them up on this.
No one seems to be willing to say ‘look here - you have a clear agenda and blackmail anyone who doesn’t agree with you - you have no voice for for women or children and you should shut up. I am suspicious of everything you say. You seemingly centre kink and sex to everything you do and say - this is not your average behaviour. I see you...’ I’d vote for them. Even if it was Boris.
Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.
Join the discussion
Registering is free, quick, and means you can join in the discussion, watch threads, get discounts, win prizes and lots more.Get started »
Please login first.