Minutes of their meeting discussing it here and the two relevant pages attached as screen grabs.
They had 15k odd people fill it out, and in view of that are going to get professional analysis. I don’t think it’s because of the numbers, it’s because they didn’t get to sneak it through without anyone noticing. It’s interesting that they weren’t going to do this in the first place.
They are going to do an equality impact assesment (something they said they wouldn’t to me on the phone which they then backtracked slightly on via email).
They misrepresent EA 2010 saying you can’t discriminate against transsexuals. Now of course you can’t discriminate, but you can exclude them if proportionate/legitimate.
They do accept that sex based protections are a thing.
They have decided not to report to members until after the government publishes the results of their own consultation.
So the people with a vested interest in the City of London thought they’d get away with sneaking this through without it being noticed. ManFriday fought this super hard, and will continue to ensure that women and girls are protected properly in any policy the city enacts. I wonder if they wish they’d removed the consultation and written it properly in plain English like we asked now 