Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

The City of London consultation didn’t go quite as they hoped...

125 replies

SwearyG · 30/09/2018 09:45

Minutes of their meeting discussing it here and the two relevant pages attached as screen grabs.

They had 15k odd people fill it out, and in view of that are going to get professional analysis. I don’t think it’s because of the numbers, it’s because they didn’t get to sneak it through without anyone noticing. It’s interesting that they weren’t going to do this in the first place.

They are going to do an equality impact assesment (something they said they wouldn’t to me on the phone which they then backtracked slightly on via email).

They misrepresent EA 2010 saying you can’t discriminate against transsexuals. Now of course you can’t discriminate, but you can exclude them if proportionate/legitimate.

They do accept that sex based protections are a thing.

They have decided not to report to members until after the government publishes the results of their own consultation.

So the people with a vested interest in the City of London thought they’d get away with sneaking this through without it being noticed. ManFriday fought this super hard, and will continue to ensure that women and girls are protected properly in any policy the city enacts. I wonder if they wish they’d removed the consultation and written it properly in plain English like we asked now Grin

The City of London consultation didn’t go quite as they hoped...
The City of London consultation didn’t go quite as they hoped...
OP posts:
Floisme · 30/09/2018 10:04

Following some minor protest Grin

You bloody stars.

AsAProfessionalFekko · 30/09/2018 10:05

And the only 70% thing. Dear God when I worked there uk nationals were in the minority because of the companies that were based there! International firms.

user1495884620 · 30/09/2018 10:06

"Only" 70 per cent are UK nationals.

From Wikipedia: At the 2011 census, 36.7% of London's population was foreign born (including 24.5% born outside of Europe). With 3,082,000 residents born abroad in 2014. London has the largest population number (not percentage) of foreign-born.

Hardly surprising that some interested parties would be foreign nationals then, is it?

KatVonGulag · 30/09/2018 10:06

Well done for the hard work on this.

Happityhap · 30/09/2018 10:07

So in fact, the whole thing was meant to be sneaked under the radar, with no consultation and no-one noticing - until Man Friday got on the case! Star

TigerDrankAllTheWaterInTheTap · 30/09/2018 10:08

Well done! I have vague hopes that one day I will be brave enough to swim in the Hampstead Ladies' Pond but in the mean time I do use the public toilets on the Heath and in the City and I occasionally visit the Guildhall Art Gallery, all of which come under the ambit of the Corporation. So I felt I had a legitimate interest in the consultation. When I worked in the city a long time ago, I used one of its branch libraries. It's a tiny area of London but there must be millions of people going in and out of the Square Mile every working day.

The other day I had my first experience of a unisex multi-cubicle loo in a place. It was clearly marked unisex, which was good (rather than gender neutral, which would be gobbledegook to a lot of people). On opening the door, I found a range of cubicles with substantial floor to ceiling walls and doors, so no possibility of anyone looking under or over from the adjacent cubicle and effective sound insulation, also good.

Nevertheless, I didn't like it. As I was going in, there was a man coming out. OK, I'm not used to this, and I expect I could get used to it. But the wash hand basins were all outside the cubicles. That was what bothered me. I have on occasion in the past emerged from a cubicle with blood on my hands (not dripping with gore! just what I couldn't get off with the loo paper). I would have hated to have to wash my hands in those circumstances standing next to a man.

Some people will feel I'm being a bit precious about this, but I think my personal privacy matters. I wondered how this unisex arrangement would have been received by a strict Muslim or Orthodox Jewish person.

This sort of stuff is why I am so grateful to Man Friday and all the other brave people who've put their heads above the parapet to fight for sex-segregated facilities. Thanks

invisibleoldwoman · 30/09/2018 10:10

Congratulations. I filled in the survey. I often feel with these things that there is no point because my voice won’t be heard. But I am wrong! 😁Without all your work I wouldn’t have heard about the survey.

Clearly it has not gone as they expected 🤣. Every voice counts.

Thank you for all you do.

TallulahWaitingInTheRain · 30/09/2018 10:11

ManFriday you are bloody brilliant

TerfAndSerf · 30/09/2018 10:17

Activists are relying on the public not knowing what's going on.

As long as they work in secret, only pack the population of these surveys with sympathetic respondents and ensure the rest of the public, you know, the people who will be affected, don't respond, they will succeed in pushing their agenda.

Well done to everyone who publicised this survey so widely, that actual, 'ordinary' members of the public actually had their say.

ToeToToe · 30/09/2018 10:22

Exactly TerfandSerf.

Activists had successfully managed to pass the GRA in law under the radar, and have subsequently gloated about that.

I suspect they hoped they could get self ID and other stuff, like this consultation, through in the same underhand way - and they've failed.

Many, many thanks to the women of ManFriday, and all the women fighting these legislation changes.

LangCleg · 30/09/2018 10:25

Oh, Sweary - brilliant work from you and Amy and all the Man Friday fellas. You are wonderful and brilliant and inspirational and, more to the point, you get shit done.

GulagsMyArse · 30/09/2018 10:26

Oh good work. I filled it, feeling it was pointless, so glad I did.
It was a pile of bollocks anyway and conducted in a really bias manner.

Good, good, good.

Re: the Ponds. I left a couple of weeks ago on a hot day, as there was a constant stream of men coming and looking over the fence at women sunbathing. They stand by the sign and pretend to look at the sign and have a good ol gawp at the women. This is on the heath side enterance, where the City of London have failed to safeguard and provide proper screening.
Yep only women and girls.

After one of the lifeguards caught a man taking photos, I’d had enough.

I mean what could possibly go wrong women, you hysterical women need to dail you fear down.

hello, city of London you already have a mixed Gender pond. Fuck right off.

Jesus what is it about women having there own space that is so threatening.
You have the whole world men.

ProfessionalBarren · 30/09/2018 10:30

Great news - congratulations! Thanks for drawing attention to it here and on Twitter. Cheeky fuckers thinking none of the nice kind ladies would mind. We mind very much.

breastfeedingclownfish · 30/09/2018 10:31

Edward Lord again.

Well done Sweary and Man Friday.

There are many grassroots women's groups working and campaigning about this subject. Well done to all of you. And keep going, it's working

Charliethefeminist · 30/09/2018 10:34

Well done Sweary, thanks for the links, thanks for the explanation, thanks for the campaign and thanks to everyone who posted the link to the consultation over and over.

CuppaTeaAndAJammieDodger · 30/09/2018 10:36

I'm so incredibly grateful for women such as sweary and manfriday - you are the Pankhursts and Davisons of the 21st century.

Charliethefeminist · 30/09/2018 10:41

Best we can hope for is long grass at the moment
1 stop the law changing in favour of self ID
2 reverse the policy changes which already undermine sex specific spaces despite the Equality Act
3 change the zeitgeist so that it is socially acceptable to listen to women
4 ensure clarification in law of biological sex, of 'gender reassignment' and of any self ID loopholes

Ineedacupofteadesperately · 30/09/2018 10:41

Thanks manfriday. This is good news.

Charliethefeminist · 30/09/2018 10:42

In that order, but the first job is kicking everything into the long grass instead of this rush to change the law to women's disadvantage

AsAProfessionalFekko · 30/09/2018 10:45

I read somewhere that the barbican loos are unisex these days (not sure if its all of them).

Something about that just doesn't sit right with me about than - not only considering that in the barbican is a girls school.

ContessasGulagSpaDay · 30/09/2018 10:48

Excellent news Sweary Grin

MuchasSmoochas · 30/09/2018 10:52

They’ve got the law completely wrong at Point 6. Transsexuality is not a protected characteristic. You are not protected if you identify with a different gender from that which was assigned to you at birth. You are protected if you have undergone, are undergoing or intend to undergo a process of reassigning sex. Not if you wear a frock.

DontCisgenderMe · 30/09/2018 10:53

Well done and thank you so much for all that you have done.

SwearyG · 30/09/2018 10:56

ASA they did make them unisex but changed back after outcry. They had a consultation with a trans lobby group and genderqueer singer and decided to implement the mixed sex loos in a few areas.

OP posts:
UpstartCrow · 30/09/2018 11:01

Thank you so much for all you have done, and this really cheering update Smile