Child raped in toilet by Transwoman

[Letterleaf]

Hang on. I thought trans women in female toilets were never a threat. In fact a trans person at my work told me this never happened…

www.dailymail.com/news/article-16132895/German-transgender-policewoman-rapes-14-year-old-girl-stash-child-porn.html

You don't seem that interested in having reasonable discussions as you've basically dismissed people who know that some men rape women as having an 'extreme' view. It's really not that difficult to get hold of statistics and know that 95% of sexual assaults are by men. I wonder what you mean by 'genuine transwomen'? They are still men, whatever way they identify.

Because there is no such thing as a transwoman. A man cannot transform into a woman therefore there is no transwoman only a bloke pretending to be a woman.

I know plenty of men. I'm not aware that any of them are 'rapey ones' and yet I still know that men can commit rape. I don't excuse all men of the potential of committing this crime just because I, personally, don't know any 'rapey ones'. I find it hard to see the logic in your thinking.

He’s no more a woman than I am a supermodel in the wrong body.
Wannabe, maybe but it’s just wishful thinking.
He is male and he has male genitalia.

Captured organisations can say what they like (ie what will placate an aggressive ideology), but that doesn’t change reality.

Wanting to cause serious and often painful damage to your own body, in pursuit of a delusion, has to be a sign of mental illness.

In other words, basically all they have to do is use an opposite-sex name and make sure it’s on all their paperwork, and tick the opposite-sex box when asked.

Because the government knows as well as we do that the idea of living as the opposite sex is meaningless.
A man can try to disguise himself as a woman. He can tell people he’s a woman, and never go out without make-up and high heels.
He’s still a man, living as a man in disguise.

The WHO says they are used scientific
evidence as the basis to move transsexualism
from mental health to sexual health:

“The 11th revision of the WHO International
Classification of Diseases and Related Health
Problems (ICD-11) reconceptualised categories
based on additional empirical data and
advances in medical and scientific knowledge
about sex and gender.”

https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/documents/gender/sogie---faq-final-08.10.2024.pdf

Whatver is on X or Reddit may or may not be true, and people have various motivations for
putting stuff there - sometimes noble and honest and sometimes the opposite.

Look I understand want to believe this is all evidenced, above board and done with the best of intentions. Unfortunately this can’t be relied upon.

The stuff on the Reddit forums are from transitioners and TRAs. I have been absolutely horrified by some of the material on there.

I also dislike the assumption some people make and push, that all transwomen want access to women's spaces to do pervy things or rape us.

I have never, ever seen anyone say that.* *

I have however, seen many posters like yourself use it as a straw man.

Why is it so hard to grasp? Most people can understand that

All rapists are men
=/=
All men are rapists

But because some are, we keep all of them out off places where woman are vulnerable.

Everyone understands this. And yet

"Some TW are rapists" - which is an undeniable* fact, gets turned into:
'You said all TW are rapists, you bigot!'

*undeniable except by people who argue that the rapists are somehow 'pretend' TW. Given that we can never know the contents of another person's mind, and given that all is required to be true trans is to consider yourself to be, its a useless and irrelevant distinction. Nobody else can tell which is which, even if a distinction exists in their own mind.

WPATH recommendations have been shown to be based on politics and ideology rather than real evidence. Look up the WPATH files on Genspect.

Also see this article on the GenderBlog that came out this week with an interview from a clinician who has worked in a gender clinic.

https://genderblog.net/former-gender-clinician-its-pseudo-medicine/?utm_source=noptin&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=New%20Post%20Notification%20-%20Former%20Gender%20Clinician:%20#8220;It’s%20pseudo-medicine”

I'm very sorry this man happened to you.

The opinion of one clinician is very interesting but it is just that - one person’s opinion, not evidence.

Much the same can be said about the criticism that WPATH recommendation are based on politics and ideology - that is the opinion of Genspect and is an interesting viewpoint but not a proven fact.Their analysis is based on leaked files so the information is likely to be incomplete and the people who did the work are biased. So I wouldn’t totally ignore it but I would assume that everything form Genspect is heavily spun - and ironically ideology based - rather than a balanced view of the situation from many angles which is what WHO has done.WHO also considered psychiatric research, access to healthcare, stigma and a number of other issues.

An 'opinion' you say...

https://segm.org/sites/default/files/2026-08/WPATH%20Motion%20to%20dismiss_Aug%202026.pdf

https://www.city-journal.org/article/wpath-ftc-lawsuit-gender-medicine

"The World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) now claims that its “standards of care” are merely one opinion in a debate over youth gender medicine. This marks a dramatic change for WPATH, which spent years promoting its approach as the only ethical one to help youth and adults who experience distress associated with their sexual embodiment.

WPATH makes this claim in a legal filing submitted in a lawsuit brought against it by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC)."

Tbf, it wasn't clear to you because some posters are deliberately vague and put single mildly provocative statement up the top of a thread (I think to derail) and then spend the rest of their time responding to the reasonable replies in the vein of "I didn't say that", "you've put words in my mouth", and "it is impossible to have a reasonable conversation on these threads". It's basic gaslighting. They do it all the time. They don't really state a position, just elude to something they know we disagree with, and play ping pong until we tire out. Very snarky behaviour.

You are misunderstanding the psychology of so-called gender confusion.

Well will you look at that. That thing that never happens has gone and happened again. It’s such a shock that a deviant with a fetish has behaved like deviants with fetishes behave.

Its not so much that it "sadly came true" but more that "it fucking happened again"
How many times does it need to happen before people say "enough" ?

Please can can you provide a link to this WHO research and reporting on actual evidence.

Already done….. see my PPs

I was hoping to see the actual scientific evidence for the supporting medical and psychiatric studies. The link to the ICD -11 does not provide this. The FAQ document has a lot of references but is clearly a political and ideological publication and the research quoted has all been conducted in the field of human rights, nothing clinical or medical.