Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Man arrested for self identifying as a converted muslim woman.

254 replies

AwfulButTrue · 12/09/2026 18:02

I think this throws the door open for all kinds of questions about fairness.

Men have been banned from covering their faces at protests so one man identified as a muslim woman and wore a burka, he was arrested.

I've seen 2 media outlets so far with headlines reporting that 'a man' has been arrested.

If we break it down...

If a 'real' muslim woman attends a protest (a Pro Palestine one for example) would she be arrested?

Has he been arrested for wearing the burka or identifying as a woman falsly?

Why is he not believed when he says he is a woman?

After all, it is fluid day to day and just a feeling! And any man can decide to become a woman at any point?

And who says he cannot decide to convert to Islam??

And why is he being reported as 'a man in a burka' when transwomen are NEVER reported this way when they self identify, even after committing rape?!

We all know why he is doing this.

But he is simply playing the establishment at their own game.

Why have so many Palestine protests occoured with men covering their faces with Kaffirs and balaclavas but it only becomes a problem now?

Why is it a problem to self identify now?

Why is it not a problem for a muslim woman to cover her face in a bank or school or park but this 'muslim woman' cannot?

Of course its ridiculous

But the point is that ALL self identification and complete covering of the face in public is ridiculous

But its only this man be arresed and called out for seemingly both things?

Man arrested for self identifying as a converted muslim woman.
OP posts:
Thread gallery
18
lcakethereforeIam · Today 12:25

chirrupybird · Today 12:06

It doesn't matter if he's a man or a woman if they have their face covered they have to remove it for the police to be able to identify them. The fact it was a man wearing a burka is totally irrelevant. No one is allowed to cover their face and refuse to remove the covering for the police, particularly in an area where face coverings are specifically banned.

That's not true, although you'd think so. Face coverings for jobs, religion or health are exempted. So women wearing burqas don't have to remove face coverings which is what this guy is trying on. This is under this new law. There are probably other circumstances where the police can ask anyone to display their face. I suspect this is in circumstances where crimes are or are suspected of being committed. If someone is suspected of shoplifting for example. This law is different, you don't have to be doing anything suspicious let alone criminal.

Grammarnut · Today 12:34

GreenFootstool · 12/09/2026 18:06

He's been arrested for wearing a face covering - it could have been a surgical mask and the outcome would have been the same.

The prohibition is temporary and under Section 158 of the Crime and Policing Act 2025, and bans the wearing of face coverings used to conceal identity during any protest activity.

In addition:
"A Section 60AA order will also be in place, covering the same area. This order gives officers the power to require a person to remove any items being used to conceal their identity, such as masks and face coverings. Any failure to comply can result in the person being arrested."

The self identification is the usual red herring, thrown in by a man who has no comprehension of the law on any front but knows he wants a newspaper headline or five.

He is entirely entitled to identify as a Muslim woman who chooses to wear a burka and nikab. We know that gender and belief are fluid things and that tomorrow he may identify as a Rastafarian NB person from Ethiopia because that's how gender works. Certainly, he is playing the system because he is angry at unfettered immigration (as should we all be - it is a state's duty to regulate immigration) and he chose a way of doing that which got him noticed. Why are TRAs not speaking up for him/her/them and demanding compensation for misgendering him/her/them? He is making two good points.

TheywontletmehavethenameIwant · Today 14:24

BackToLurk · Today 12:24

Listen to the BBB

BackToLurk · Today 14:44

TheywontletmehavethenameIwant · Today 14:24

Listen to the BBB

Do you mean the bit where he says the police have new powers under the act to ban items intended to conceal identity in a designated area or was there another bit?

New posts on this thread. Refresh page