Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

feminism or transphobia?

1000 replies

giraffezoo · 08/04/2026 14:54

Long time lurker of this forum, first time poster.

I have read through many of the threads on here and I have to say there are lots of views that I find quite shocking.

There almost seems to be two sides of the ‘gender critical’ movement on here that I can see.

The first seems quite reasonable. They wish to have protections in place for women and their rights. Regardless of whether you agree or disagree (e.g. trans folk in toilets, transgender prisoners etc) they are stating a view based on safety and women’s rights.

The second bunch are the ones who I find myself disagreeing with, and who post things that I personally consider as transphobic. Some examples of this would be: refusing to use someone’s pronouns or citing being transgender as a mental illness which needs to be cured.

I feel that the first group are genuinely feminists who are concerned with women’s rights, and feel as though they need to speak out on their own concerns. The second group are masquerading under the pretence of feminism to say hateful or controversial things.

I am interested to hear other views on this point (and I’m sure there will be a lot here who don’t agree with me!)

OP posts:
Thread gallery
18
BackToLurk · 10/04/2026 09:24

mattala · 10/04/2026 09:19

Im not saying you don’t understand. Im saying you all think you’re above it because you’re clever enough to spot it and that’s just arrogant. Youre bombarded all day from birth. To think you’re immune to me is arrogant

I don’t see posters routinely suggesting they aren’t impacted by sexism or capitalism. Maybe you could provide some examples.

And that still doesn’t explain why such an apparently ardent opponent of sexism and capitalism has bought in to a sexist and capitalist ideology.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 10/04/2026 09:25

You accused a well known and thoughtful poster here of using AI, didn’t you?

mattala · 10/04/2026 09:25

BackToLurk · 10/04/2026 09:24

I don’t see posters routinely suggesting they aren’t impacted by sexism or capitalism. Maybe you could provide some examples.

And that still doesn’t explain why such an apparently ardent opponent of sexism and capitalism has bought in to a sexist and capitalist ideology.

Go to the guys thread about gi being innate. Post after post of women saying no gender stereotypes don’t impact me. Even if you’re immune, the system around you isn’t and if you use that system, you’re impacted.

mattala · 10/04/2026 09:26

Ereshkigalangcleg · 10/04/2026 09:25

You accused a well known and thoughtful poster here of using AI, didn’t you?

Yes. And?

mattala · 10/04/2026 09:26

mattala · 10/04/2026 09:26

Yes. And?

A lot less than I’ve been accused of by that poster

BackToLurk · 10/04/2026 09:27

mattala · 10/04/2026 09:23

Fair enough. I’m feeling quite attacked and piled onto for believing that humans very susceptible to manipulation and propaganda, even the ones who think the are enlightened. I’m also being accused for thinking I’m the one who first noticed ai - lol I sent you a study of someone else saying it. Clearly I didn’t notice it first.
this is why I get annoyed. I just end up being assigned opinions I never had in the first place

The way you posted implied that no one else on this board was aware of bias within AI.

BusyAzureTraybake · 10/04/2026 09:27

mattala · 10/04/2026 09:07

You haven’t actually engaged with my opinions. You’ve just assigned ones onto me I never had in the first place and forced me to defend them.

This is because your opinions have been presented in a muddled way and, when questioned, you have been unable to explain or defend them. Step back, take a break.

mattala · 10/04/2026 09:28

BackToLurk · 10/04/2026 09:27

The way you posted implied that no one else on this board was aware of bias within AI.

Well from the reaction to me calling it the Orwellian thought police you all seemed rather uninformed

Ereshkigalangcleg · 10/04/2026 09:28

I guess from your mistake with Catiette’s post, no one is taking you for any kind of authority on AI 🤷‍♀️

RedToothBrush · 10/04/2026 09:29

CautiousLurker2 · 10/04/2026 09:14

But why are we bigots if we refuse to use preferred pronouns? We’re not bigots if we chose not to join a Christian colleague saying grace over their lunch or for not joining a muslim one when they duck out to pray in the faith room … because it is accepted that we don’t share their beliefs. And we’re not expected to. We simply have to be respectful of their right to have their beliefs and to practice their faith. They don’t stand up and accuse us of being bigots as a result of non-participation… so why do you say not using preferred pronouns would -should- confer bigotry status? (Esp as we would only use pronouns about them, not to their faces because we use their names when directly addressing them - so the faith equivalent is not only shared participation in a religious act of observance in the presence of colleagues but also in their absence!)

Edited

Because we must do what matallan says or we won't be given jobs, won't have friends and won't be in the cool mums club.

Obviously this is both thoroughly democratic and legal. Cos they say so because they understand the issues better than us.

mattala · 10/04/2026 09:29

BusyAzureTraybake · 10/04/2026 09:27

This is because your opinions have been presented in a muddled way and, when questioned, you have been unable to explain or defend them. Step back, take a break.

this is happening because you guys keep accusing me of stuff I then have to defend against. So of course my arguments seem muddled because I keep going off on tangents that have nothing to do with my points.

RedToothBrush · 10/04/2026 09:30

mattala · 10/04/2026 09:28

Well from the reaction to me calling it the Orwellian thought police you all seemed rather uninformed

I swear this poster doesn't read their own posts!

mattala · 10/04/2026 09:30

RedToothBrush · 10/04/2026 09:29

Because we must do what matallan says or we won't be given jobs, won't have friends and won't be in the cool mums club.

Obviously this is both thoroughly democratic and legal. Cos they say so because they understand the issues better than us.

You don’t. And you will be given jobs. But just not at places that require you to present neutrally when it comes to political beliefs. Whether that’s fair or not is another question but you cannot deny this. Look at the boards of people losing their jobs over this. People are too scared of tribunals so they’ll just make up another reason not to hire. Is that fair? No. Is it happening? Yes.

mattala · 10/04/2026 09:31

RedToothBrush · 10/04/2026 09:30

I swear this poster doesn't read their own posts!

I don’t think you read my posts tbh

RedToothBrush · 10/04/2026 09:31

mattala · 10/04/2026 09:29

this is happening because you guys keep accusing me of stuff I then have to defend against. So of course my arguments seem muddled because I keep going off on tangents that have nothing to do with my points.

That's because you have a completely incoherent argument and we keep finding those holes and you don't like it and can't admit it because if you did youd have to admit you were wrong all along.

Language matters mate.

You are hilariously own goaling after own goaling.

RedToothBrush · 10/04/2026 09:32

mattala · 10/04/2026 09:31

I don’t think you read my posts tbh

Oh I read them and laugh because they are full of utter nonsense and you are six years behind the rest of the world.

mattala · 10/04/2026 09:32

RedToothBrush · 10/04/2026 09:31

That's because you have a completely incoherent argument and we keep finding those holes and you don't like it and can't admit it because if you did youd have to admit you were wrong all along.

Language matters mate.

You are hilariously own goaling after own goaling.

My points were I don’t like mocking behaviours. Morally I know where that line is. I have defended this via lemon gate. I don’t think I was proven to be wrong there? This is why I don’t think you actually read my posts

mattala · 10/04/2026 09:33

RedToothBrush · 10/04/2026 09:32

Oh I read them and laugh because they are full of utter nonsense and you are six years behind the rest of the world.

In what sense am I six years behind the real world?

BusyAzureTraybake · 10/04/2026 09:34

mattala · 10/04/2026 09:30

You don’t. And you will be given jobs. But just not at places that require you to present neutrally when it comes to political beliefs. Whether that’s fair or not is another question but you cannot deny this. Look at the boards of people losing their jobs over this. People are too scared of tribunals so they’ll just make up another reason not to hire. Is that fair? No. Is it happening? Yes.

Using wrong sex pronouns isn't a neutral act. That is perhaps the nub of your misunderstanding of our position

mattala · 10/04/2026 09:35

BusyAzureTraybake · 10/04/2026 09:34

Using wrong sex pronouns isn't a neutral act. That is perhaps the nub of your misunderstanding of our position

No but avoiding them entirely and using you or they is

RedToothBrush · 10/04/2026 09:35

mattala · 10/04/2026 09:32

My points were I don’t like mocking behaviours. Morally I know where that line is. I have defended this via lemon gate. I don’t think I was proven to be wrong there? This is why I don’t think you actually read my posts

It's not about morality. It's about reality.

Morally biology shouldn't be such a bitch but it is. Sucks.

Sex still isn't gender. Gender is still sexist tripe.

mattala · 10/04/2026 09:36

RedToothBrush · 10/04/2026 09:35

It's not about morality. It's about reality.

Morally biology shouldn't be such a bitch but it is. Sucks.

Sex still isn't gender. Gender is still sexist tripe.

And it exists unfortunately whether you like it or not, and it impacts you every day, whether you like it or not.
and that is my argument in a nutshell

BusyAzureTraybake · 10/04/2026 09:36

mattala · 10/04/2026 09:35

No but avoiding them entirely and using you or they is

Some of us do that irl, some of us don't

Shortshriftandlethal · 10/04/2026 09:37

mattala · 10/04/2026 07:52

Yes to that person. Who the hell are you to decide what to call someone? Who died and made you god? So much arrogance here

Pronouns are not the same as personal names, they are lingusitic and social tools used by other people. They do not belong to an individual. They are referential.

DialSquare · 10/04/2026 09:38

mattala · 10/04/2026 09:29

this is happening because you guys keep accusing me of stuff I then have to defend against. So of course my arguments seem muddled because I keep going off on tangents that have nothing to do with my points.

It may feel like an attack as there are a lot of posters responding to you but we are just doing the same as you and defending our position.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.