Mail carry out investigation into Trans terror group Bash Back

[fromorbit]

Important;

Trans mob's plot to smash up the offices of senior politicians - including the Prime Minister and Wes Streeting
A transgender activist group is planning a series of attacks on senior politicians' offices, including the Prime Minister's, The Mail on Sunday can reveal.

Militant group Bash Back has said its sights are also set on Wes Streeting - just months after vandalising his constituency office.

The gender warriors said: 'If you think we're done, you've got another thing coming.
'MP or PM, you've seen us once, we'll see you again.'

The group's conspiracy was uncovered by this newspaper after it urged members to form 'cells' and plot criminal damage offences against high-profile targets.

A list of other potential marks include the Free Speech Union (FSU) and feminist organisation Sex Matters.

Last night, we notified the Metropolitan Police and the parliamentary security services of our findings.

FSU founder Lord Young commissioned an independent security briefing about the group, which is calling for 'total transgender liberation'.

A transgender activist group is planning a series of attacks on senior politicians' offices, including the Prime Minister's

Militant group Bash Back has said its sights are also set on Wes Streeting - just months after vandalising his constituency office

The report, obtained by The Mail on Sunday, suggests British intelligence is monitoring the trans activist cells....

In a pamphlet obtained by this newspaper, Bash Back claims to target 'organisations that promote transphobic rhetoric - from banning hormones and puberty blockers, to confining us to or defining us out of categories of woman and man, to promoting conversion therapy and facilitating hideous harassment campaigns'.

It says they 'should come to expect us', adding: 'All of our targets have blood on their hands. We refuse to let them wash it off in peace.'

Bash Back's first public attack was on Mr Streeting's Ilford North constituency office in July, when it painted 'child killer' and smashed windows months after puberty blockers were banned for children on the advice of medical experts and the Cass Review of gender identity services.

Since then, the group has formulated an action guide - seen by this newspaper - for sympathisers to carry out similar attacks.

The document details how to avoid police detection as they plot criminal damage and steal equipment while filming their actions.

A security briefing on the group - also seen by The Mail on Sunday - reveals it has gone to extensive lengths to hide its identity, including removing internal metadata from public documents and using ultra-secure email systems.

The security memo says: 'Given the first attack was on the office of a HM Gov minister, almost certainly the group responsible will be investigated by security services.'

Activists engaged in criminal activity could be among the near 3,000 profiles following Bash Back across social media platforms, the security document adds.

Maya Forstater, the chief executive of Sex Matters - also included in the list of offices that are potential targets - said: 'After years in which police forces rolled out the red carpet for trans lobby groups and harassed women's rights campaigners, it's no wonder that Bash Back seems to believe it can cause criminal damage with impunity.'

A government spokesman said: 'Threats, harassment, and vandalism are not only cowardly, they're criminal and we will pursue anyone who targets politicians and their staff in this way, with the full force of the law.

'The rhetoric from this group is dangerous and only seeks to distract from our work to improve the lives of trans people.'

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15416739/Trans-mobs-plot-smash-offices-senior-politicians-including-Prime-Minister-Wes-Streeting.html

Many years after Trans groups started using political violence to silence women it seems the Police are actually investigating when male politician's property is under threat. Figures.

Supporting Violence and silencing women was always the main aim of trans stuff. The truth is coming out.

Mumsnet has been monitoring this group for a while.Previous threads
https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5384285-trans-group-attack-wes-streetings-constituency-office

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5436532-trans-activists-vandalise-ehrc-who-want-labour-to-reject-supreme-court-ruling-guidelines-re-sex-biology

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5425523-welcome-to-a-new-era-of-trans-rage

Free speech union need to put something out about this

their website is down

Apparently, this is true.

Yet another example of how anti social and criminal too many transactivists are. Yet they expect society to subsidise them, prioritise their wishes and ignore their regular threats, intimidation and criminal acts against citizens.

On the most obvious Computer Misuse charge alone, that's a potential 2 year sentence for everyone involved, & hell, why not throw in a nice stiff fine each since it's available?
I do hope that personality-disordered twerp Baker is involved, it's a straightforward breach of his licence conditions if he is.

They might be to busy reporting it to the The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO), the fine that they receive for this might bankrupt them.

I think that is fairly unlikely. Their maximum fine is 4% of turnover, and they would only pay the maximum if they could be shown to have been negligent or irresponsible

The current theory appears to be that UK terfs are gaslighting everyone into thinking Terf Island is financed by US evangelicals. Or something.

Maybe Bash back should be deemed a terrorist organisation

Are you saying they are saying we made up the Southern Baptists (cheque in the post). 😂

Surely I'm not the only one receiving a plain brown envelope containing £1,000 in crisp £20 notes with a USA postmark every month?

Testing for & exploiting an insecure plugin isn't on a par with Susie "ex- IT manger" Green leaving a server wide open to any passer-by interested in the personal details of Mermaids' service users. Taking the site offline, self-reporting to & co-operating with the ICO are all good steps to take.
Bash Back having decided to host the stolen data as if they were showing off a proof of concept at a Black Hat hackathon, & not a band of inadequately socialised feckwits with all the opsec of hyperactive toddlers, is also very helpful.

Edited for dyslexia, some may remain

And thus far they've pretty much had their wish.

How sad it would be if it's Bash Back who finally get the government and our institutions to notice how aggressive, deluded and anti social the gender ideology movement is. Though I did think the insufferable crick kids might have been the tipping point, maybe its needed the naked male aggression to be as clear as it is here.

I bet the likes of Whittle are tearing their hair out at this lot constantly saying the quiet part out loud.

If you are going to visit the Bash Back website, use Tor. These people have demonstrated that they can't be trusted with your IP address.

I doubt Whittle cares - she also makes nasty comments and celebrates violence against TERFs

Well we’ve been telling them this for years but they always maintained it was the far right US dollar funding it all

Anyway, what have they got to say for their stunning revelation that it’s ordinary people funding the crowdfunders?

The Canary's spin is that it's all rich Brits and racists. https://archive.is/9O7hr

I snagged a copy of the CSV file to check it for friends and family to warn them if they've been outed. Before I deleted it, I totted up the unique names and donor ids. There's 2085 donors. The Canary mentioned 20, by name or by comment. So 2065 people have been smeared on the internet for their unwitting association with 20 people who are rich or nasty, 18 if you think that donating in memory of Charlie Kirk or expressing support for a serving US vice-president isn't actually racist. The Canary have smeared over 2000 people based on fewer than 1% of the donors.

Yes.

Hahaha they really are the kings of DARVO.

So 2065 people have been smeared on the internet for their unwitting association with 20 people who are rich or nasty

I must admit that I don’t see why being “outed” as donating to FSU would be an issue, beyond not wanting your personal details including who you choose to donate to, published.

I hope FSU take action and also can get control of the narrative publicity wise.

“No issue apart from personal details including who you choose to donate to published”? Oh well, that’s alright then! Why stop there?!

This came to my attention seeing that idiot Willoughby trying to expose anyone he thought had the same (pretty generic) names as people on the list, which is a very silly game to be playing.

So many data protection, cyber security, libel issues abound here that it’s hard to know where to start. Even Glinner shrugging it off as ‘inconsequential’. It’s nothing of the sort.

Never in my life thought I’d find myself aligned with Toby Young but here we are.

I had an email from FSU at 7.30pm this evening (Monday) telling me my details appear on the list. But it's name, amount donated and any comments made along with the donation. So, in fact, stuff that is usually visible when I donate to any crowdfunder. I will not worry about this. Toby Young says no financial details have been hacked but they're not 100% sure about email addresses. That last bit I might worry about.

They did get their system checked out by a cyber security firm who assured them it was safe - but they were wrong. It sounds like they've taken all the right reporting steps.

It would be wonderful to see these shits in deep, deep trouble for the chaos they cause.

Some of us, for reasons of working in captured fields, have good reason to fear being outed. When I donate to Crowdjustice, I untick the box that displays my name.

I am very glad that I didn't donate to FSU. In their email, did they confirm whether they'd reported this cyber attack to the police?

Given the fact FSU has a lot of lawyers and some politicians involved Bash Back tactically may have screwed up. Only going to add fire to the proof that TAs are dangerous bigots which security need deal with.

Actions:

1 - Folks anyone writing or rewriting to MPs or Press over this should mention how doxing women has been a tactic of TAs along with violence for decades. It is part of their wider authoritarian tactics.

This is just a continuation of their usual tactics. Not a new thing. Women and men who defy them are to be targeted and attacked because they cannot tolerate people who think biology is real.

2 - If you are part of any support group for those defying TAs review internet security ASP.

Ooo Windy has posted the list and claimed Martin Freeman is on it bold. Windy you know that is breaking the law :

https://nitter.net/canthelpmenow7/status/2008240942986523101

Note the far left site Canary has also shared the list. Again could face legal action.