Mail carry out investigation into Trans terror group Bash Back

[fromorbit]

Important;

Trans mob's plot to smash up the offices of senior politicians - including the Prime Minister and Wes Streeting
A transgender activist group is planning a series of attacks on senior politicians' offices, including the Prime Minister's, The Mail on Sunday can reveal.

Militant group Bash Back has said its sights are also set on Wes Streeting - just months after vandalising his constituency office.

The gender warriors said: 'If you think we're done, you've got another thing coming.
'MP or PM, you've seen us once, we'll see you again.'

The group's conspiracy was uncovered by this newspaper after it urged members to form 'cells' and plot criminal damage offences against high-profile targets.

A list of other potential marks include the Free Speech Union (FSU) and feminist organisation Sex Matters.

Last night, we notified the Metropolitan Police and the parliamentary security services of our findings.

FSU founder Lord Young commissioned an independent security briefing about the group, which is calling for 'total transgender liberation'.

A transgender activist group is planning a series of attacks on senior politicians' offices, including the Prime Minister's

Militant group Bash Back has said its sights are also set on Wes Streeting - just months after vandalising his constituency office

The report, obtained by The Mail on Sunday, suggests British intelligence is monitoring the trans activist cells....

In a pamphlet obtained by this newspaper, Bash Back claims to target 'organisations that promote transphobic rhetoric - from banning hormones and puberty blockers, to confining us to or defining us out of categories of woman and man, to promoting conversion therapy and facilitating hideous harassment campaigns'.

It says they 'should come to expect us', adding: 'All of our targets have blood on their hands. We refuse to let them wash it off in peace.'

Bash Back's first public attack was on Mr Streeting's Ilford North constituency office in July, when it painted 'child killer' and smashed windows months after puberty blockers were banned for children on the advice of medical experts and the Cass Review of gender identity services.

Since then, the group has formulated an action guide - seen by this newspaper - for sympathisers to carry out similar attacks.

The document details how to avoid police detection as they plot criminal damage and steal equipment while filming their actions.

A security briefing on the group - also seen by The Mail on Sunday - reveals it has gone to extensive lengths to hide its identity, including removing internal metadata from public documents and using ultra-secure email systems.

The security memo says: 'Given the first attack was on the office of a HM Gov minister, almost certainly the group responsible will be investigated by security services.'

Activists engaged in criminal activity could be among the near 3,000 profiles following Bash Back across social media platforms, the security document adds.

Maya Forstater, the chief executive of Sex Matters - also included in the list of offices that are potential targets - said: 'After years in which police forces rolled out the red carpet for trans lobby groups and harassed women's rights campaigners, it's no wonder that Bash Back seems to believe it can cause criminal damage with impunity.'

A government spokesman said: 'Threats, harassment, and vandalism are not only cowardly, they're criminal and we will pursue anyone who targets politicians and their staff in this way, with the full force of the law.

'The rhetoric from this group is dangerous and only seeks to distract from our work to improve the lives of trans people.'

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15416739/Trans-mobs-plot-smash-offices-senior-politicians-including-Prime-Minister-Wes-Streeting.html

Many years after Trans groups started using political violence to silence women it seems the Police are actually investigating when male politician's property is under threat. Figures.

Supporting Violence and silencing women was always the main aim of trans stuff. The truth is coming out.

Mumsnet has been monitoring this group for a while.Previous threads
https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5384285-trans-group-attack-wes-streetings-constituency-office

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5436532-trans-activists-vandalise-ehrc-who-want-labour-to-reject-supreme-court-ruling-guidelines-re-sex-biology

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5425523-welcome-to-a-new-era-of-trans-rage

Yes, how likely is it that anyone would be charged and convicted of these crimes? The polis don't seem bothered, anyway.

Seems a bit circumstantial if creating the Wikipedia page is all they've got on him. Not exactly a smoking gun.

Though it is a bit suspicious that when he uploaded the Bash Back logo he cited the source as being the GitHub site where the website was published from, and not the actual website itself. But then, anyone could have found it with a bit of sleuthing (go to a website that tells you where other websites are hosted, see it's GitHub, create a free account on there, search for any unique text excerpts of the website) and as a cyber student this must be in his capabilities. On the other hand, why would he do that instead of citing the website?

Exactly - a random wiki editor would cite the website…

Highly unlikely they’d go searching randomly for GitHub as the resource.

Presumably he’s been tracked by the National Cyber dudes as the GitHub owner too?

This could be a useful time for him to exit. Naive twerp has not the first clue of what he's getting into if he's palling about with SJ Baker.

We only have the Daily Mail reporting, which will be superficial. There will have been a lot more going on for the judge to take the steps he has. It will all come out in our faourite channels ovver the next few days, I'm sure.

Article created by Wikipedia user Chorl. Chorl's user page says:

Hi, I'm Autumn (aka chorl) and I use they/she pronouns.

This account is not actively monitored; if you need to get in touch, see <link I redacted to prevent accidental clicking>.

The only person to ever update that userpage is Chorl.

As a precaution, use Tor if you wish to visit Redpath's personal website or any other website operated by transactivists.

And archive, archive, archive anything that transactivists have published about themselves.

IIRC “chorl” is referenced as a link on Autumnself’s LinkedIn page. However, both that and his father’s pages appear to have been deleted.

https://www.thetimes.com/uk/law/article/autumn-redpath-free-speech-union-bash-back-cxj8nd3vx

The Times reported on this today but no new information.

I’d find parenting that smug little prick wearing

Autumn's Github account used to own 14 repositories, one of which was blog.chorl.dev. It now owns 12. The Repositories tab isn't in archive.

Autumn might have been doing Daddy's website for him.

Bit hypocritical, isn't it? Doesn't want people looking at his own LinkedIn page with his own public posts, when he's allegedly leaked private details of donations in order to try 'name and shame'.
Glad that this is all being dealt with in court. It's long past time that these groups had official scrutiny.

Ah, I get it, Autumn and his dad's LinkedIn pages have gone.

The other missing repository was a Discord bot, comes up in search results but 404s when you click the link. I wonder what the address of the Discord server was, and what the bot did?

I don't have much faith regarding the veracity of this statement (about Redpath) in the article:

'In a statement last week Bash Back said: “While we do not deny that Bash Back activists were involved in the leaking of FSU’s information, we do deny any association with the individual prior to this injunction. The Free Speech Union’s accusations against that individual are utterly baseless.'

I wonder if dad has put him in the naughty corner

Either it's true, or they are trying to protect him and themselves.

OK so they (or at least someone with the twitter password) is saying he's a patsy.

OK let the law sort it out, and hopefully the people who did the Fucking Around crime will get a chance to Find Out soon.

I get the feeling that some individuals aren't as smart as they think they are... and have a rude awakening coming. Let's see.

Prediction : "my client is a massive autistic and didn't know any better" is going to be relied upon in court - AKA The MacKinnon Defence.

In a fabulously ironic twist, Bashback are asking for Autumn Redpath's name and face not to be shared. He values his privacy, apparently.

I reckon his mum and dad are raging.

Indeed and also foolishly assumed that the people they disagree with must also be massively stupid (as well as being evil TERF bigots!)

Let’s hope he gets booted off his PG course, whatever it is. But it’s Warwick (my own AM 😠) so who knows?

I'm wondering if the women of 'Cyberwomen' will actually be breathing a deep sigh of relief that they no longer have to pretend to support 'Autumn' as their Diversity and Inclusion Officer. He took the name of their last president, and seems to me to have a bit of an unhealthy interest in belonging to this 'women's' group.

Apparently Redpath likes ethical hacking. He is really likely to be in BB.

"He posts about doing "ethical hacking" on his social media. "
Receipt:
https://x.com/MrAndyNgo/status/2010515283572670887

Ethical hacking is providing a security service by testing the weakness of systems with the permission of the owner of the said systems.
Ethical hacking is not attacking an IT system illegally "because someone deserves it". There's already a term for that, it's just called "crime".

Publishing the names of people who support the Free Speech Union is 'bravely fighting nazis'.

Publishing the name of a man who supports Trans Bash Back is 'putting a vulnerable person at risk'.

Is it me or did anyone look at that picture of Redpath and think "that's a man. Actually, there's a slight hint of a submissive / kind vibe coming from his mounth - maybe he's actually a man pretending to be a woman".

We are at a point in society where I genuinely see a man who has grown his hair long and had a proper shave this morning and start wondering if he claims to be a woman even if there are no other signifiers. (obviously some men who claim to be women don't even bother with the shave, but the whole "bothering to shave" thing is a red flag now!)