Mail carry out investigation into Trans terror group Bash Back

[fromorbit]

Important;

Trans mob's plot to smash up the offices of senior politicians - including the Prime Minister and Wes Streeting
A transgender activist group is planning a series of attacks on senior politicians' offices, including the Prime Minister's, The Mail on Sunday can reveal.

Militant group Bash Back has said its sights are also set on Wes Streeting - just months after vandalising his constituency office.

The gender warriors said: 'If you think we're done, you've got another thing coming.
'MP or PM, you've seen us once, we'll see you again.'

The group's conspiracy was uncovered by this newspaper after it urged members to form 'cells' and plot criminal damage offences against high-profile targets.

A list of other potential marks include the Free Speech Union (FSU) and feminist organisation Sex Matters.

Last night, we notified the Metropolitan Police and the parliamentary security services of our findings.

FSU founder Lord Young commissioned an independent security briefing about the group, which is calling for 'total transgender liberation'.

A transgender activist group is planning a series of attacks on senior politicians' offices, including the Prime Minister's

Militant group Bash Back has said its sights are also set on Wes Streeting - just months after vandalising his constituency office

The report, obtained by The Mail on Sunday, suggests British intelligence is monitoring the trans activist cells....

In a pamphlet obtained by this newspaper, Bash Back claims to target 'organisations that promote transphobic rhetoric - from banning hormones and puberty blockers, to confining us to or defining us out of categories of woman and man, to promoting conversion therapy and facilitating hideous harassment campaigns'.

It says they 'should come to expect us', adding: 'All of our targets have blood on their hands. We refuse to let them wash it off in peace.'

Bash Back's first public attack was on Mr Streeting's Ilford North constituency office in July, when it painted 'child killer' and smashed windows months after puberty blockers were banned for children on the advice of medical experts and the Cass Review of gender identity services.

Since then, the group has formulated an action guide - seen by this newspaper - for sympathisers to carry out similar attacks.

The document details how to avoid police detection as they plot criminal damage and steal equipment while filming their actions.

A security briefing on the group - also seen by The Mail on Sunday - reveals it has gone to extensive lengths to hide its identity, including removing internal metadata from public documents and using ultra-secure email systems.

The security memo says: 'Given the first attack was on the office of a HM Gov minister, almost certainly the group responsible will be investigated by security services.'

Activists engaged in criminal activity could be among the near 3,000 profiles following Bash Back across social media platforms, the security document adds.

Maya Forstater, the chief executive of Sex Matters - also included in the list of offices that are potential targets - said: 'After years in which police forces rolled out the red carpet for trans lobby groups and harassed women's rights campaigners, it's no wonder that Bash Back seems to believe it can cause criminal damage with impunity.'

A government spokesman said: 'Threats, harassment, and vandalism are not only cowardly, they're criminal and we will pursue anyone who targets politicians and their staff in this way, with the full force of the law.

'The rhetoric from this group is dangerous and only seeks to distract from our work to improve the lives of trans people.'

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15416739/Trans-mobs-plot-smash-offices-senior-politicians-including-Prime-Minister-Wes-Streeting.html

Many years after Trans groups started using political violence to silence women it seems the Police are actually investigating when male politician's property is under threat. Figures.

Supporting Violence and silencing women was always the main aim of trans stuff. The truth is coming out.

Mumsnet has been monitoring this group for a while.Previous threads
https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5384285-trans-group-attack-wes-streetings-constituency-office

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5436532-trans-activists-vandalise-ehrc-who-want-labour-to-reject-supreme-court-ruling-guidelines-re-sex-biology

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5425523-welcome-to-a-new-era-of-trans-rage

Yet, going by that earlier LinkedIn post, one wonders if their sense of entitlement and specialness has been encouraged institutionally ie by the way they were treated as special at university.

Note also that it was at Warwick University that Nadhim Zadhawi was heckled by pro trans activists including the son of Yvette Cooper. Obviously a captured campus.

Is there any benefit to it being taken down? They're bragging openly about their antics which is surely more damaging for them.

Maybe. Although Charlie seems to have busily FOI'd them over their 'trans inclusion' policies.

We assume the reason we were targeted is that we’ve defended thousands of gender-critical feminists who’ve got into trouble for expressing their belief in the biological reality of sex.

Thousands? Is that true?

In this clip, Toby Young of the Free Speech Union says that by far the largest number of claims they're defending (he says 40%) is women who are being discriminated against for their views on sex and gender.'...we fought over 4,000 cases and where they've come to a conclusion we've been successful about 80% of the time. And in our case database on Salesforce, um by far the largest category is sex and gender, about 40% um of those 4,000 plus cases we fought over the past 5 years, uh, have been defending um, uh, gender critical women...
...the front line, the people who find themselves cancelled more often, the people who find it more difficult than anyone else to kind of, uh, express how they feel about something, um, even if it's perfectly lawful, um, are women.'

Ah, it's missed the link.

s

1600 individual cases then, if I've managed the maths today?

Hm. Who was insisting this week that only something like four women had ever raised issues?

I can believe that a lot of those successful cases brought on behalf of women were resolved by a letter from the FSU legal team explaining the law and what the respondent needed to do to comply, with no need for media attention to be drawn to either party.

That's an eye opener. The cases that make it into the news, and even the ones that get threads on here, are clearly only the tip of the iceberg. And below the FSU cases are all the situations where women complain but are intimidated into shutting up, or just shrug and assume no one will listen to them. Only four complaints my foot.

1600 cases in 5 years is just over 6 cases a week. He specifically mentions women complaining about having to share 'bathrooms' and changing rooms with biological men who think they are women.

That is absolutely more than TransLucent's '4 complaints in 3 years'.

Maybe they wouldn't have such a big work-load if trades unions did their job.

Well done those 1600 women for refusing to budge up for the sad men👏

Every time the saddos at Translucent open their mouths they establish without a shadow of doubt that they have zero insight in or empathy for women and women's lives.

Less "captured" than a motherlode of 3rd-rate "Critical Theory" of this that & the other. Warwick decided to be a "cutting edge" outfit decades ago & as courses in say, queer theories of law, are vastly cheaper to run than a good biochemistry lab, & offer a pathway to credentials for the dimmer middle class, it's done very nicely out of dumbing down UK graduates.

Another major article in the Mail focusing on Redpath

Judge unmasks trans zealot's links to shady group behind hacking attack on free speech campaigners
On Wednesday morning, High Court documents named Redpath as a ‘respondent’ in the injunction. In court appearance via videolink on Friday, the student called on the judge to grant an anonymity order, insisting they were not part of Bash Back.
In the rejected plea, Redpath said: ‘This group attracts a lot of hostility, and I fear there is a real prospect of harm to me.
‘I’m not here to defend Bash Back but having followed them in the past I thought they might claim publishing this information was justified. As an activist group they believe their actions are just, even if they include breaking the law.’
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15452267/Judge-unmasks-trans-zealots-links-shady-group-free-speech-campaigners.html

I'm as sympathetic to the plight of the unfortunate Gazans as anyone, but what does "Free Palestine" even mean, and what do they imagine a UK govt can do to bring it about? Just another round of empty virtue-signalling.

Redpath has adopted the Upton smirk.

It's the Omnicause, innit. And of course he's wearing a keffiyeh over his graduation gown 🙄

Anyway, he's not been quite as clever as he thought he was. They tracked him via his Wickedia entry on Bash Back. Ever narcissistic, aren't they.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BASH_BACK

Tracked and found via Wiki? Wiki?

To quote Sister Michael, that’s actually quite funny.

Wikipedia, forsooth!

For a cybersecurity expert, he doesn't seem to take much care to cover his tracks.

Given the UK security forces are involved anyone who knows him from BB should be panicking right now.

Probably monitoring all his stuff.

Identifies as a cybersecurity expert.

Off topic, but I'd completely forgotten the expression "forsooth!" It is excellent and I shall be using it often in future.

I find it strange that none of these people seem to be aware that vandalism is a criminal offence (Criminal Damage Act 1971) and that by claiming to have committed vandalising they are confessing to a crime.

On the whole, having a criminal record tends to be a bit of a handicap in life.

Remember though, we have had judges allowing activists off for such crimes on the basis that the judge thought they were somehow justified.