Graham Linehan arrested on arrival at Heathrow Part 2

[IDareSay]

First thread here

Started thread 2 as this seems destined to run for some time...

You really didn't follow proceedings yesterday.

Tell me more about Troubled Blood. I love hearing all the ways you never read it.

Graham will be amused by this.

Maugham, the kimono fox killer, has confirmed he is going to refuse to apologise and will fight against Sarah Phillimore's defamation case against him to defend the "reputation" of Sophie Sparkles. Crowdfunder to support SP opening later today:

It promises to be another hilarious case. Thread:
https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5400132-glp-are-going-after-sarah-philmore-and-are-going-to-lose?page=11

Go on, tell us about how 'it' got off the hook…oh wait…

Tell me more about Troubled Blood.

And don't forget to tell us about not being able to read between the lines…

The thing we have to remember today, on this thread, is that it is Glinner in the dock, not Tarquin. Tarquin hasn't been charged with anything, Glinner has.

Today will be tough for him (Glinner), I think.

For emergency use only:

That Guardian piece of ‘reporting from yesterday 🙄. They couldn’t make their bias towards the men in dresses with hurt feelings any clearer.

It’ll be interesting (& no doubt infuriating) to see how they spin & misrepresent today’s proceedings.

I'm so glad you found it! I must have thrown my sign out.

I know the thread has moved on, but SB is coming across as the worst kind of coward and hypocrite.

This is true, however yesterday's proceedings were an absolute shower of shit for the prosecution, even if you do take one line from the witness out of context and think it conclusively settles everything.

Sorry! Yes, you're right. And I do know better!

This is typical transactivation, though.

They'll go to court desperate to try and pin something, anything, on men and women who disagree with them, viewing it as a win.

Even though, their entire ideology, terrible past, appalling attitude and creepy behaviour gets exposed, highlighted and broadcast from one end of the country to the other, in the process.

And then they complain about the public's negative attitude!

Cope A+

I have no idea what that means. Which pretty much sums up every single argument a TRA has ever made

Agree.

I noticed the lack of unicorn plopping yesterday when Tarquin was unable to remember anything that might incriminate him, was lying (for example what he told the police as to how he had GL’s number) & general dissembling.

No herd of hooves then to say See, see, we told you so!

Funny that.

Is his alleged persecution of KJK and her children ialso going to come up today?

Do we know if he actually called her children on their phones?

Just popping this here to say Nick has started tweeting:

Morning. On the way back to Westminster Magistrates Court for day two of Graham Linehan’s trial for harassment and damaging a phone. Here is ⁦
@Glinner
⁩ at the end of yesterday’s hearing.

Yesterday the prosecution set out the case and the complainant (an 18yo male called Sophia Brooks) gave evidence, and was cross-examined. Read the tweet thread on that here: (shows link to yesterday's posts)

I am deeply grateful to everyone who has seen fit to bung me the cost of a coffee, a pint or even a bloody London pint since I found out I was able to come back today. If you think you can afford to make a small donation, there’s more info here:
https://store29806256.company.site

Is SB being questioned today?

You know actually following the court case might help with this big talk of evidence.

I think SB's 'evidence' is done. Hope Graham will bring up the doxxing of KJK.

Tell us you don't understand what X is without telling us…

The shameless, condescending cheek of some people

idk - as Charabanc says, it’s (unfortunately) not SB who is on trial. The evidence presented yesterday and his cross examination was of course highly pertinent in forming the context for the communications between SB and GL. Idk if SBs behaviour re KJK would be directly relevant to this case or not?

Also a perfect description of Tarquin’s performance yesterday.

Imagine your life’s work is to attend places you know you’re not welcome, film (even when asked not to) write awful things on line (such as wishing PP had had acid, not soup, thrown in her face) track down peoples personal contact details …… I could go on but the thread is filling up.

Then …. you go crying to the police about being ‘alarmed & distressed’ (words lifted from the piece of legislation you hope they’ll charge the person with) claiming everything you’ve done is being done to you.

Shameless.

What are you on about?

It's perfectly normal respectable behaviour that you'd expect from any woman and not an incel troll living in his mother's basement.

🤣🤣 Well I guess he is fulfilling his job description!!