Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Graham Linehan arrested on arrival at Heathrow Part 2

1000 replies

IDareSay · 03/09/2025 14:04

First thread here

Started thread 2 as this seems destined to run for some time...

I just got arrested again

I arrived back in London to discover the UK is still a police state run by trans activists

https://grahamlinehan.substack.com/p/i-just-got-arrested-again

OP posts:
Thread gallery
45
SabrinaThwaite · 05/09/2025 11:48

P told the court she found GL using male pronouns "rude" - quite measured. Yes she did say several times she was "alarmed and distressed", but there's no reason to believe she isn't telling the truth when she said that.

P as to criminal damage - she changed her cover that day and didn't see any damage - it's the sort of thing she would notice. GL threw the phone onto a road. It is likely there would be damage. There is no reason to...

... disbelieve her account. When SB challenged GL that was not a crime - nor is recording it - given the context. So there is no crime that GL was attempting to prevent. It was not to prevent crime but an act in anger and indicative of his dislike to the complainant.

GargoylesofBeelzebub · 05/09/2025 11:51

BettyBooper · 05/09/2025 11:48

I really can't have any sympathy for anyone who repeatedly puts their phone in someone's face like this. I don't think it's unreasonable for it to get chucked. 🤷

That may not be the law though 😆

Me neither. I think if someone had repeatedly harassed people to the extent tarquin did and then the phone was shoved in my face I may have reacted similarly.

SabrinaThwaite · 05/09/2025 11:51

- it tallies with his tweet about being proud of throwing the phone across the road.

[P ends]

DC - just on that last point - GL's note on being proud was in response to Julie Bindel's point about SB being a bellend and harassing women all day.

DC it is falacious to say that a consideration of the available defences cannot be considered by the court now. Finally what I would observe about the last recording is that there is a point when what might be described as provocative becomes harassment.

SternJoyousBeev2 · 05/09/2025 11:51

SabrinaThwaite · 05/09/2025 11:46

P this is repeatedly abusive comments made by a person with a very large following, celebrity status, a middle aged man in his 50s. He is of great influence. It is against a person who he might view who he might view as annoying, but who has a lower status...

... This was published to a very large audience online. In relation to the tweets which have been put before the court - D's comments are oppressive and H. Those tweets fall into the matter of a reasonable excuse for...

... which he has the burden of proof and we're not there. In respect of SB's tweets - they are in the context of ongoing situations where people insult each other. So we don't need to look futher than what he said over the BoI - "groomer... sissy-porn addicted... scum"

The trouble with this argument is that it gives free rein to every Tarquin up and down the land to harass anyone they want as long as the Tarquin has a smaller social media following.

SabrinaThwaite · 05/09/2025 11:52

J am going to rise for a few minutes to gather my thoughts. also need a comfort break. We will resume at 12.15pm

[court rises]

OP posts:
SabrinaThwaite · 05/09/2025 11:53

Boy am I ready for a coffee!

BettyBooper · 05/09/2025 11:53

about SB being a bellend

Bet SV loved having the opportunity to say that! 😂

Charabanc · 05/09/2025 11:53

IDareSay · 05/09/2025 11:52

Thread 3

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5404988-graham-linehan-arrested-on-arrival-at-heathrow-part-3

Please continue to fill this one before moving over if you would be so kind 😉

Thank you!

Off for a "comfort break" 😆now.

SternJoyousBeev2 · 05/09/2025 11:53

SabrinaThwaite · 05/09/2025 11:48

P told the court she found GL using male pronouns "rude" - quite measured. Yes she did say several times she was "alarmed and distressed", but there's no reason to believe she isn't telling the truth when she said that.

P as to criminal damage - she changed her cover that day and didn't see any damage - it's the sort of thing she would notice. GL threw the phone onto a road. It is likely there would be damage. There is no reason to...

... disbelieve her account. When SB challenged GL that was not a crime - nor is recording it - given the context. So there is no crime that GL was attempting to prevent. It was not to prevent crime but an act in anger and indicative of his dislike to the complainant.

Amazing that he conveniently remembers changing his phone cover that very same day but forgets so much else that arguably should be much more memorable

Charabanc · 05/09/2025 11:54

SabrinaThwaite · 05/09/2025 11:52

J am going to rise for a few minutes to gather my thoughts. also need a comfort break. We will resume at 12.15pm

[court rises]

Edited

Judge is off for a fag break

SlackJawedDisbeliefXY · 05/09/2025 11:55

MummBRaaarrrTheEverLeaking · 05/09/2025 11:27

- but any large fine would have a huge effect on GL and those he radicalises - trying to stop GL is surely a thing to seek - I will help anyway I can and can send a draft text for an witness statement...

😲😲😲

Utterly unhinged.

- I will help anyway I can and can send a draft text for an witness statement...

Draft text for witness statement? You get to adjust your witness statement before it is formally recorded?

SabrinaThwaite · 05/09/2025 11:56

SternJoyousBeev2 · 05/09/2025 11:53

Amazing that he conveniently remembers changing his phone cover that very same day but forgets so much else that arguably should be much more memorable

And that he only got to the crickets incident venue at 17:00.

Seems to have a very convenient memory, given he answered 'I don't remember' to anything awkward.

Charabanc · 05/09/2025 11:56

"Lynsay Watson" is such a slime. I'm so glad he can't hide behind anonymity any more, or deny being the SEEN Police accounts.

Christinapple · 05/09/2025 11:56

If the law is changed then that means everyone would be free to make threats including those who aren't on your side?

MyrtleLion · 05/09/2025 11:56

Summary of this morning’s tweets from Nick Wallis.

https://t.co/B7Sgw0xsqr

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1963870564499456372.html

https://t.co/B7Sgw0xsqr

CompleteGinasaur · 05/09/2025 11:56

SlackJawedDisbeliefXY · 05/09/2025 11:55

- I will help anyway I can and can send a draft text for an witness statement...

Draft text for witness statement? You get to adjust your witness statement before it is formally recorded?

When you're not officially anything to do with the case and you haven't actually been asked for one?! 🙄

SionnachRuadh · 05/09/2025 11:56

SternJoyousBeev2 · 05/09/2025 11:51

The trouble with this argument is that it gives free rein to every Tarquin up and down the land to harass anyone they want as long as the Tarquin has a smaller social media following.

Yes. If I were to decide to harass, let's take a name at random, Michael Gove, him being famous and me being unfamous would not get me off the hook, or allow me to claim harassment if Gove tweeted "who is this weirdo shoving a phone in my face"

murasaki · 05/09/2025 11:57

SlackJawedDisbeliefXY · 05/09/2025 11:55

- I will help anyway I can and can send a draft text for an witness statement...

Draft text for witness statement? You get to adjust your witness statement before it is formally recorded?

I'd assumed he meant draft a statement for Tarquin to amend, fitting how the police want a statement to look format wise, and in this case probably content wise. Which is atrocious as any statement should be wholly written by Tarquin.

GargoylesofBeelzebub · 05/09/2025 11:57

SternJoyousBeev2 · 05/09/2025 11:51

The trouble with this argument is that it gives free rein to every Tarquin up and down the land to harass anyone they want as long as the Tarquin has a smaller social media following.

True.

The prosecution also mentions glinners age but not tarquins. You’d think if he was actually under 18 that would have been mentioned here?

MyrtleLion · 05/09/2025 11:58

MyrtleLion · 05/09/2025 11:56

Summary of this morning’s tweets from Nick Wallis.

https://t.co/B7Sgw0xsqr

I will repost this at the top of the next thread.

SternJoyousBeev2 · 05/09/2025 11:58

Fuck Off

murasaki · 05/09/2025 11:59

LW basically said he was going to write Tarquin's statement for him. Was he even there? Not that it matters.

SternJoyousBeev2 · 05/09/2025 12:01

Hadn’t heard of this Burrows character until this morning. A quick google search reveals a few interesting things but none very surprising

ErrolTheDragon · 05/09/2025 12:01

GargoylesofBeelzebub · 05/09/2025 11:57

True.

The prosecution also mentions glinners age but not tarquins. You’d think if he was actually under 18 that would have been mentioned here?

Somewhere upthread, it seems Glinner thought SB was at uni studying comp sci. There aren’t many under 18s doing that.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.