Graham Linehan arrested on arrival at Heathrow Part 2

[IDareSay]

First thread here

Started thread 2 as this seems destined to run for some time...

SV whats your attitude towards male violence against women
SB in what context
SV in any context
SB it's not okay ever

So if it's not ok ever, why the need to ask for context 🙄

He’s a psycho.

No one has ever said 'no' to the entitled little shit, have they.

He's proving the comments GL made about him are true.

I don’t even need to be able to see him to know that he makes my skin crawl.

Isn’t he just?

SV points out SB's phone has a cover on in MM's video
[missed what SB said in response]
SV goes to the Apple estimate for work which shows it was bought in 2020.
SB yes
SV you emailed the police in November and told them you were going to have your phone assessed for any damage

... Mr Linehan had caused.
SB yes
SV Apple Genius called the damage an impact point and a dent
[SV takes him to his statement]
SV you describe a "deep dent" on the top left had side and on the bottom. - where's the deep dent - show us on the photos
SB they're poor quality

SV show us where the housing has come away
SB which part of the bundle
J tab 3
SV is there a photo
SB Yes!
SV which number
SB 2
SV show us
SB holds up phone
SV whereabouts - where has the housing come away

SB partly
SV four year old phone
SB yes
SV pristine before that
SB yes - kept in a case with a screen protector
SV any photos
SB people don't usually take photos with their phones

SV you went to harass people at the BoI conference
SB no
SV you thought they were bigots
SB "they are bigots that doesn't stop me from not harassing them"
SV were people happy being filmed
SB if they were happy to film me they should be happy to be filmed back

Is tarquin claiming that he was the one being harassed here? 🤔

SV should ask him to explain why they are bigots. I'd enjoy that.

SV so it's a matter of who started it
SB not necessarily!
SV you had wished violence on one of those people you called bigots..
SB.. who was NOT attending that conference.

[SV takes us to a transcript of a confrontation with MM]
SV you ask why she's got her fist clenched and if she's going to punch you - did you think she was?
SB it was a genuine question

SV if you look at her hand - you'll see its not a fist she's holding something
SB it's a poor photo
SV you were there
SB it was 11 months ago
SV at the end of your confrontation you say to MM - "go lie about your assault more". Is that acceptable
SB yes - she was being

.. rude about me online.
SV so what was your best case scenario from approaching GL about the "domestic terrorist" quote.
SB that he would apologise
SV after he called you a groomer
SB yes possibly
SV really

I wonder if they mindlessly affirmed and are now wondering if it was the right thing to do tbh?

just seen that he has been charged, I don't call relentless harrassment and knocking a phone out of someones hand harmless.

The relentless harrassment is disgusting and I am sure you would have plenty to say if it was a woman harrassed by a man!!

SB yes if he was a sane and normal person
SV do you think he was a sane and normal person
SB he could be - he might see the error of his ways
SV why film him on the second occasion in selfie mode - why did you think that might elicit an apology

SB maybe to shame him into an apology
SV you know GL was trying to get info on you to pass on to the police
SB I don't think the way to do it is tagging the police on twitter
SV the third time you approached GL you followed him through a crowd of people

Wow. Sarah Vine has leapt to the top of the league table of my favourite barristers. Apologies to Naomi Cunningham and Ben Cooper.

'She was being rude to me online therefore it was ok to threaten her'

Did he actually just say that out loud?!

Muppet.

SB I didn't follow him I approached him
SV and you put your phone in his face
SB I did not put my phone in his face
SV what did you think he was going to do
SB I don't know maybe walk off
SV by the third time you approached him did you not think he was angry at you SB no

Have you read any of the posts on this thread about the court case

So the way to do it is to zoom in on a pic of his house, Google Street View it for info, and stalk? Is that better?

So it appears tarquin was the one harassing Glinner.

Well yes, he's a DARVO king. It's a feature not a bug.

SV did the language not suggest it
SB he uses this language all the time - day in... it's typical of him.
SV and so not threatening
SB it's language other people might find threatening
SV did you film any other men else at close range
SB yes a volunteer
SV what happened

SB I asked who they were - they said they were just a volunteer. I was satisfied with that response and stopped.
SV other than him and GL - the only other people you filmed were women
SB no I filmed two security guards
SV why
SB just a continuation of filming

Keep up. We’re in the middle of the court case where actually it’s becoming clear that glinner was the one being harassed.

SV you spent your afternoon harassing women
SB no
SV and Mr Linehan
SB no
SV and you used your phone for the purposes of that
SB no

You might want to bother reading the transcript of his accuser’s testimony in court, he just stated that he wished that a woman who had soup thrown over her had had acid thrown in her face instead, Brooks is a psycho. Thanks for telling us who you are.