Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

JKR Didn’t Have an Opinion. She Poisoned the Well

1000 replies

CSIRCP · 28/08/2025 14:32

This post will likely be a little too long for most, but if you can spare the time and have a cuppa handy let's sit down and have a chat, shall we?

Firstly, let’s stop calling this a debate. It’s not. This isn’t two sets of ideas clashing. This is one woman’s fear and confusion being weaponized against an entire community.

What J.K. Rowling has done is not just share an opinion. She’s poisoned the well. And that poison is spreading through politics, education, the media, and even the courts.

At the beginning, it might have looked like a tweet. Then a blog. But what she wrote in that essay was revealing: “If I’d been born thirty years later, I too might have tried to transition. The allure of escaping womanhood would have been huge.”
That’s not neutral. That’s projection. It was a confession, repackaged as concern. She projected her own dysphoria and personal battles onto the entire trans community and used it as the foundation for a movement built on suspicion and fear.

She said she cared about women’s rights. Then aligned herself with those who believe all trans women are predators.
She liked racist and Islamophobic tweets. She repeated antisemitic tropes. She cast activists as violent men in dresses. She accused anyone who challenged her of misogyny while branding herself the face of feminism.
All the while she built up a devoted audience that now includes some of the most extreme anti-trans voices in Britain and beyond.

This “gender critical” movement is not about safety, and it’s certainly not about truth. It’s about control.
Kellie-Jay Keen-Minshull (Posie Parker), one of Rowling’s ideological allies, has welcomed neo-Nazis to her rallies. Actual Nazis. The kind of people Rowling once wrote villains about.
In one case, people connected to this movement were linked to the satanic terror group 764 — a group that has influenced teen suicides and violent attacks in UK schools. Let that sink in. This is who she’s empowering.

She didn’t just turn away when that started. She doubled down. She gave this movement a gloss of legitimacy. She used her fame to funnel people toward disinformation, fear, and cruelty—and dressed it all up as feminism. But it isn’t feminism when it excludes, vilifies, and harms other women. Especially trans women. Especially intersex people. Especially anyone who doesn’t fit into the narrow fantasy of who is acceptable.

Rowling’s language now echoes in government documents. Her phrases like “gender ideology” have been lifted from far right sources, including the Vatican and authoritarian regimes, and mainstreamed into British law. Her influence helped set the stage for the UK Supreme Court to redefine the word “woman” based on sex assigned at birth, stripping rights from trans and intersex people under the Equality Act. That’s what happens when the well is poisoned. People stop thinking. They start reacting.

Meanwhile, her cult chant her slogans as though they are scientific fact. But science says otherwise. Peer-reviewed studies show that trans people’s brain structures do not align with their sex assigned at birth. They show that gender identity forms in the womb, shaped by hormones and biology not ideology. Large-scale DNA studies have found gene variants linked to gender incongruence. And intersex people exist. That is biological fact. Not one of these truths can be erased by Rowling’s fiction.

What makes this so dangerous is how calm it all sounds. Rowling doesn’t scream. She whispers. She calls it “concern.” She says she’s “just asking questions.”
But it’s never neutral to question someone’s right to exist. It’s not a debate when one side is simply trying to live and the other is trying to strip away their legal recognition and healthcare.

This isn’t just a disagreement. This is a slow campaign of erasure, led by someone with a global platform and millions in the bank.

She’s not some deluded soul from MN; she’s a multi-millionaire author whose words shape global policy. She’s not being silenced. She’s being echoed by judges, by pundits, by politicians trying to climb the ladder by stepping on the backs of trans, non-binary, and intersex people.

And let’s not pretend it stops there. Her influence has allowed people to feel safe expressing open homophobia, biphobia, and hatred toward anyone who challenges gender norms. Some of the same people aligned with her have mocked survivors, denied racism, and claimed slavery was “fine” if it was “kind.”
This is not a group grounded in empathy. It’s a movement that thrives on exclusion and resentment. Some of them now openly identify as neo Nazis. That’s where we are.

So next time someone says “she’s just worried” or “she’s not anti-trans” or “can’t we just disagree,” consider these words. Show them what poison looks like. Not just hateful speech but the deliberate seeding of doubt, division, and cruelty, all wrapped in a soft voice and a smug smile. J.K. Rowling didn’t protect anyone. She infected people. And when she’s gone, her legacy won’t be literature it will be the damage she left behind.

You don’t need to cancel her. You just need to see her clearly.
And if you blindly follow Rowling and her ideas then you need to reflect on what you’re really endorsing.

Because ignorance is not an excuse. Not anymore.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
34
ImGoingUpstairsToTakeOffMyHat · 28/08/2025 15:38

Sammybabes16 · 28/08/2025 15:31

I’m not from Scotland so I do not know those details. I lived in Norway for many years where the have self ID. It really isn’t an issue and it had not affected our rights as women at all. Norway has been voted by the UN many times as the best country for women’s rights in the world. That’s what’s important to me not what someone wears or looks like or which bathroom they use.

Thats irrational

I find it difficult to believe that no Norwegian women were opposed to self ID.

Nevertheless, in the U.K., which is a different country to Norway, we don’t have self ID and women don’t want it. Women don’t benefit from it. Allowing men to say they’re women has only ever been harmful and violent, with women being victims

What is a woman?

Sammybabes16 · 28/08/2025 15:38

Mate? Di you call every woman who disagrees with you ‘mate’? This is a typical response from your group and why I left last time. The GC cult doesn’t seem to tolerate any views that differentiate from their own narrow viewpoint. Bless ❤️

Are you aware of trans rights in most western democracies? Or are you just focussed on your small group?

Please don’t lecture me on feminism. You don’t seem to have any idea of what it means in most countries in the western world.

Boiledbeetle · 28/08/2025 15:38

ArabellaScott · 28/08/2025 15:29

Try a dab of Nutella.

I haven't got any Nutella.

Will Marmite work?

Underthinker · 28/08/2025 15:38

Sammybabes16 · 28/08/2025 15:19

Overly lazy?

im just stating a fact. You are in the same side as Trump Musk and Farage. They is a fact.

And you're on the same side as the neo nazi who shot multiple children in a school shooting yesterday.

Charabanc · 28/08/2025 15:38

TwelvePercent · 28/08/2025 15:36

TLDR

Usual trans wankery.

CassOle · 28/08/2025 15:39

As pointed out upthread (sorry, I can't remember the username), this is all getting a bit 'wah, wah, wah... don't look at the school shooting that happened yesterday'.

murasaki · 28/08/2025 15:39

I'm a bit dubious that anyone with 'babes' in their username is a feminist. They might be 16 though.

Sammybabes16 · 28/08/2025 15:39

A small minority were. As we live in a democracy sometimes you have to accept what the majority agree with / not a fringe group of angry people.

The kkk dint agree with black men being in America. You always get small groups who are against others

MistyGreenAndBlue · 28/08/2025 15:39

Beowulfa · 28/08/2025 15:33

Sammybabes16; are you aware that the UK Communist Party supports women's sex based rights. Are you quite sure they are far right?

Another good point

ArabellaScott · 28/08/2025 15:39

BernardBlacksMolluscs · 28/08/2025 15:31

Arabella, this has to stop

Edited
flirty wink GIF

Ok

nutmeg7 · 28/08/2025 15:39

Sammybabes16 · 28/08/2025 15:23

I keep hearing that but it’s just not true. There is no evidence for this. It’s a myth. The U.K. and the USA are the most anti trans countries in western democracies. I lived in Norway and it isn’t an issue.

What isn't true? If you want to respond to a particular post, it helps if you quote it. Otherwise, we've not idea what it is that you "keep hearing that but it's just not true"

SionnachRuadh · 28/08/2025 15:40

If Norway is anything like Ireland - and I suggest to the court that small countries with high social conformism and a progressive self-image might have some things in common - then you won't hear about problems with self-ID because they simply won't be reported.

I don't particularly want to rely on Gript to find out what's happening in Ireland, but there are a shitload of scandals that people who get all their news from RTE and the Irish Times will simply never know about. Including dangerous male criminals being allowed to self-ID into the women's prison estate.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 28/08/2025 15:40

CassOle · 28/08/2025 15:39

As pointed out upthread (sorry, I can't remember the username), this is all getting a bit 'wah, wah, wah... don't look at the school shooting that happened yesterday'.

YY. Nothing to see here….

Sammybabes16 · 28/08/2025 15:41

once again - the cognitive dissonance of anyone who disagrees with a small group of Gender Criticals automatically assumes they cannot be real.

I find it crazy thinking

nutmeg7 · 28/08/2025 15:41

Sammybabes16 · 28/08/2025 15:38

Mate? Di you call every woman who disagrees with you ‘mate’? This is a typical response from your group and why I left last time. The GC cult doesn’t seem to tolerate any views that differentiate from their own narrow viewpoint. Bless ❤️

Are you aware of trans rights in most western democracies? Or are you just focussed on your small group?

Please don’t lecture me on feminism. You don’t seem to have any idea of what it means in most countries in the western world.

I suspect most women on here were feministing before you were born, "babes"

Boiledbeetle · 28/08/2025 15:41

ArabellaScott · 28/08/2025 15:36

Orca women? I mean I am down with gender fluidity but cross species identities are a step too far.

But you've always accepted me being a beetle woman.

What have orcas done to piss you off?

ArabellaScott · 28/08/2025 15:41

Boiledbeetle · 28/08/2025 15:38

I haven't got any Nutella.

Will Marmite work?

Breakfast Lover GIF by Foodies

Will it ever!!!

BackToLurk · 28/08/2025 15:41

nutmeg7 · 28/08/2025 15:39

What isn't true? If you want to respond to a particular post, it helps if you quote it. Otherwise, we've not idea what it is that you "keep hearing that but it's just not true"

Oh come now. The "who the fuck are they replying to" element at least adds a little variety to the usual TRA cut and paste arguments.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 28/08/2025 15:42

I’m sure we can all see that “Sammybabes” doesn’t really have anything but insults and slurs to offer. Neither does the op. Just another day on FWR 🤷‍♀️

Sammybabes16 · 28/08/2025 15:42

Then indeed you know nothing about Norway or the rights of women there.

it seems when countries are successful with self ID you are unable to accept this and assume things which are wrong but fit your narrative.

Bless ❤️

CassOle · 28/08/2025 15:42

Sammybabes16 · 28/08/2025 15:41

once again - the cognitive dissonance of anyone who disagrees with a small group of Gender Criticals automatically assumes they cannot be real.

I find it crazy thinking

Please proofread and try again.

NoWordForFluffy · 28/08/2025 15:42

VaddaABeetch · 28/08/2025 15:00

Next you’ll be telling me you haven’t received your money from the Far Right.

If those fuckers would just send me the cash already, I'd be grateful.

#cozzyliving

ImGoingUpstairsToTakeOffMyHat · 28/08/2025 15:42

Sammybabes16 · 28/08/2025 15:35

Why is the definition orca woman so important to you? To different people it has different meanings. In Norway and most Scandinavian countries we may have a different viewpoint to TERFs.

I cannot understand your obsession with this point. As a feminist I’m more concerned about women’s rights. In Norway it’s excellent.

What is the Norwegian definition of woman?

It matters because the true definition is being completely disregarded and pushed back against by misogynists, all so they can gaslight actual women into believing that saying “men aren’t one of us” is an act of hate and violence.

So given you and your ilk are trying to take our rights away, I’d like to know on what basis you think our rights should be taken away.

Why can’t you define what a woman is? You’re SO anti-SCR (which is as wholly about definition) but can’t provide your own definition yourself? Doesn’t seem fair

DialSquare · 28/08/2025 15:43

Boiledbeetle · 28/08/2025 15:41

But you've always accepted me being a beetle woman.

What have orcas done to piss you off?

They’re too black and white. No grey area.

ImGoingUpstairsToTakeOffMyHat · 28/08/2025 15:43

Sammybabes16 · 28/08/2025 15:35

Why is the definition orca woman so important to you? To different people it has different meanings. In Norway and most Scandinavian countries we may have a different viewpoint to TERFs.

I cannot understand your obsession with this point. As a feminist I’m more concerned about women’s rights. In Norway it’s excellent.

Also how can you be concerned about women’s rights if you don’t even know what a woman is?!

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.