Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

JKR Didn’t Have an Opinion. She Poisoned the Well

1000 replies

CSIRCP · 28/08/2025 14:32

This post will likely be a little too long for most, but if you can spare the time and have a cuppa handy let's sit down and have a chat, shall we?

Firstly, let’s stop calling this a debate. It’s not. This isn’t two sets of ideas clashing. This is one woman’s fear and confusion being weaponized against an entire community.

What J.K. Rowling has done is not just share an opinion. She’s poisoned the well. And that poison is spreading through politics, education, the media, and even the courts.

At the beginning, it might have looked like a tweet. Then a blog. But what she wrote in that essay was revealing: “If I’d been born thirty years later, I too might have tried to transition. The allure of escaping womanhood would have been huge.”
That’s not neutral. That’s projection. It was a confession, repackaged as concern. She projected her own dysphoria and personal battles onto the entire trans community and used it as the foundation for a movement built on suspicion and fear.

She said she cared about women’s rights. Then aligned herself with those who believe all trans women are predators.
She liked racist and Islamophobic tweets. She repeated antisemitic tropes. She cast activists as violent men in dresses. She accused anyone who challenged her of misogyny while branding herself the face of feminism.
All the while she built up a devoted audience that now includes some of the most extreme anti-trans voices in Britain and beyond.

This “gender critical” movement is not about safety, and it’s certainly not about truth. It’s about control.
Kellie-Jay Keen-Minshull (Posie Parker), one of Rowling’s ideological allies, has welcomed neo-Nazis to her rallies. Actual Nazis. The kind of people Rowling once wrote villains about.
In one case, people connected to this movement were linked to the satanic terror group 764 — a group that has influenced teen suicides and violent attacks in UK schools. Let that sink in. This is who she’s empowering.

She didn’t just turn away when that started. She doubled down. She gave this movement a gloss of legitimacy. She used her fame to funnel people toward disinformation, fear, and cruelty—and dressed it all up as feminism. But it isn’t feminism when it excludes, vilifies, and harms other women. Especially trans women. Especially intersex people. Especially anyone who doesn’t fit into the narrow fantasy of who is acceptable.

Rowling’s language now echoes in government documents. Her phrases like “gender ideology” have been lifted from far right sources, including the Vatican and authoritarian regimes, and mainstreamed into British law. Her influence helped set the stage for the UK Supreme Court to redefine the word “woman” based on sex assigned at birth, stripping rights from trans and intersex people under the Equality Act. That’s what happens when the well is poisoned. People stop thinking. They start reacting.

Meanwhile, her cult chant her slogans as though they are scientific fact. But science says otherwise. Peer-reviewed studies show that trans people’s brain structures do not align with their sex assigned at birth. They show that gender identity forms in the womb, shaped by hormones and biology not ideology. Large-scale DNA studies have found gene variants linked to gender incongruence. And intersex people exist. That is biological fact. Not one of these truths can be erased by Rowling’s fiction.

What makes this so dangerous is how calm it all sounds. Rowling doesn’t scream. She whispers. She calls it “concern.” She says she’s “just asking questions.”
But it’s never neutral to question someone’s right to exist. It’s not a debate when one side is simply trying to live and the other is trying to strip away their legal recognition and healthcare.

This isn’t just a disagreement. This is a slow campaign of erasure, led by someone with a global platform and millions in the bank.

She’s not some deluded soul from MN; she’s a multi-millionaire author whose words shape global policy. She’s not being silenced. She’s being echoed by judges, by pundits, by politicians trying to climb the ladder by stepping on the backs of trans, non-binary, and intersex people.

And let’s not pretend it stops there. Her influence has allowed people to feel safe expressing open homophobia, biphobia, and hatred toward anyone who challenges gender norms. Some of the same people aligned with her have mocked survivors, denied racism, and claimed slavery was “fine” if it was “kind.”
This is not a group grounded in empathy. It’s a movement that thrives on exclusion and resentment. Some of them now openly identify as neo Nazis. That’s where we are.

So next time someone says “she’s just worried” or “she’s not anti-trans” or “can’t we just disagree,” consider these words. Show them what poison looks like. Not just hateful speech but the deliberate seeding of doubt, division, and cruelty, all wrapped in a soft voice and a smug smile. J.K. Rowling didn’t protect anyone. She infected people. And when she’s gone, her legacy won’t be literature it will be the damage she left behind.

You don’t need to cancel her. You just need to see her clearly.
And if you blindly follow Rowling and her ideas then you need to reflect on what you’re really endorsing.

Because ignorance is not an excuse. Not anymore.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
34
SionnachRuadh · 28/08/2025 15:29

MistyGreenAndBlue · 28/08/2025 15:25

Actually, I'd quote like to know what the "Far Right" is to these people.
What do you actually mean by this? Where is this mythical place we all apparently stand in? And do they have teacakes?

According to the clowns at "Hope Not Hate", who are paid by the Home Office because they're supposed to be experts, "far right" encompasses everyone slightly more conservative than Penny Mordaunt, and also includes left wing feminists who don't believe a man can become a woman.

That's not good enough for our TRA visitors, who seem to think it means everyone to the right of Mao Zedong (who, I am pretty sure, also didn't believe a man could become a woman)

ImGoingUpstairsToTakeOffMyHat · 28/08/2025 15:30

Sammybabes16 · 28/08/2025 15:29

Gender does exist. That statement clearly is untrue

In what way does gender exist? Can you show me a gender? What is it?

And what is a woman?

MistyGreenAndBlue · 28/08/2025 15:30

Sammybabes16 · 28/08/2025 15:19

Overly lazy?

im just stating a fact. You are in the same side as Trump Musk and Farage. They is a fact.

Last I heard, Farage was on YOUR side not ours.
Does that make YOU Far Right?

ArabellaScott · 28/08/2025 15:30

MistyGreenAndBlue · 28/08/2025 15:30

Last I heard, Farage was on YOUR side not ours.
Does that make YOU Far Right?

Awkward.

Sammybabes16 · 28/08/2025 15:31

I’m not from Scotland so I do not know those details. I lived in Norway for many years where the have self ID. It really isn’t an issue and it had not affected our rights as women at all. Norway has been voted by the UN many times as the best country for women’s rights in the world. That’s what’s important to me not what someone wears or looks like or which bathroom they use.

Thats irrational

BernardBlacksMolluscs · 28/08/2025 15:31

ArabellaScott · 28/08/2025 15:29

Try a dab of Nutella.

Arabella, this has to stop

Sammybabes16 · 28/08/2025 15:31

Then you read wrong.

Greyskybluesky · 28/08/2025 15:32

MistyGreenAndBlue · 28/08/2025 15:30

Last I heard, Farage was on YOUR side not ours.
Does that make YOU Far Right?

And that neo-nazi criminal in Germany who identifies as a woman. Sounds pretty far right to me...

Boiledbeetle · 28/08/2025 15:32

TheCatsTongue · 28/08/2025 15:20

Transplaining Thread No 562.

I thought it was No. 561.

I must have missed one.

Charabanc · 28/08/2025 15:32

Sammybabes16 · 28/08/2025 15:12

As a woman and feminist I strongly disagree. The vast majority of women are not Gender Criticals. Gender Vriticals use feminism as a shield to justify their bigotry. If you think transwomen are the problem regarding women’s rights you are no different to Trump, Musk and the rest of the far right fools,

"Transwomen" are men. HTH.

nutmeg7 · 28/08/2025 15:33

Sammybabes16 · 28/08/2025 15:18

Perfectly fine. I think sometimes mums net is a sounding room for Gender Criticals and Terfs. Those views are not a reflection of thd majority of women. I left this site before because of the vicious behaviour of GCs when I pointed out under a different username that most woken don’t hold their views.

it seems stating facts makes them angry.

Maybe proof read before you post?

Greyskybluesky · 28/08/2025 15:33

Sammybabes16 · 28/08/2025 15:31

I’m not from Scotland so I do not know those details. I lived in Norway for many years where the have self ID. It really isn’t an issue and it had not affected our rights as women at all. Norway has been voted by the UN many times as the best country for women’s rights in the world. That’s what’s important to me not what someone wears or looks like or which bathroom they use.

Thats irrational

Yes, the UN - that well-known champion of female people's rights

Merrymouse · 28/08/2025 15:33

I suggest to the court that JKR's first transgression was to inadvertently reveal in a picture that she had been reading ABOUT the assault on Maria Maclachlan, who was trying to attend an event to discuss changes to the GRA.

The OP therefore needs to dig deeper to find the true mastermind behind the claim that women need rights - Mary Wollstonecraft maybe?

Boiledbeetle · 28/08/2025 15:33

Sammybabes16 · 28/08/2025 15:22

The vast majority believe individuals should be able to chose their own gender. Whether that means changing sex to or not so what? If that was the only issue then fair enough - but it seems TERFs and Gender Criticals actively hate transwomen and focus their anger on them. Irrationally so.

If you think they are the greatest danger to women’s rights you’ve been duped

So what is the greatest danger to women's rights?

teawamutu · 28/08/2025 15:33

Sammybabes16 · 28/08/2025 15:31

I’m not from Scotland so I do not know those details. I lived in Norway for many years where the have self ID. It really isn’t an issue and it had not affected our rights as women at all. Norway has been voted by the UN many times as the best country for women’s rights in the world. That’s what’s important to me not what someone wears or looks like or which bathroom they use.

Thats irrational

Revolutionary thought, based on the amount of inconvenient facts you seem not to know that are relevant here: how about taking a bit of time to read up and understand before descending to scold the nasty ladies and spout complete mince?

Try the 'Start here' thread. It's useful.

Beowulfa · 28/08/2025 15:33

Sammybabes16; are you aware that the UK Communist Party supports women's sex based rights. Are you quite sure they are far right?

Sazzasez · 28/08/2025 15:34

Sammybabes16 · 28/08/2025 15:26

I’m not sure about that as Imnnot aware of those details. What I am aware of is the negative treatment of the trans community. Irrationally so

Press “post” to soon?

Mate: the Scottish Government & Amnesty argued before the Supreme Court that women who identify as trans should lose their sex-based rights to protection under the Equality Act from discrimination in pregnancy & maternity.

At the same time as arguing that men who identify as trans should be allowed to enter any single-sex spaces they choose & even impose themselves on organisations specifically for lesbians - a right they categorically never had.

And now they’ve lost, you & the other TRAs are yelling about “trans rights being removed”. You fricken hypocrites.

And please don’t come here & lecture us about stuff you not only know nothing about, but are clearly too lazy or illiterate to look into.

Possibly because you’re afraid you might discover the truth - and you wouldn’t like it.

Sammybabes16 · 28/08/2025 15:35

Why is the definition orca woman so important to you? To different people it has different meanings. In Norway and most Scandinavian countries we may have a different viewpoint to TERFs.

I cannot understand your obsession with this point. As a feminist I’m more concerned about women’s rights. In Norway it’s excellent.

ArabellaScott · 28/08/2025 15:36

Orca women? I mean I am down with gender fluidity but cross species identities are a step too far.

TwelvePercent · 28/08/2025 15:36

TLDR

BackToLurk · 28/08/2025 15:36

Sammybabes16 · 28/08/2025 15:35

Why is the definition orca woman so important to you? To different people it has different meanings. In Norway and most Scandinavian countries we may have a different viewpoint to TERFs.

I cannot understand your obsession with this point. As a feminist I’m more concerned about women’s rights. In Norway it’s excellent.

"I'm concerned about women's rights, but I can't tell you what a woman is"

Stone cold genius, right here

Boiledbeetle · 28/08/2025 15:36

Sammybabes16 · 28/08/2025 15:29

Gender does exist. That statement clearly is untrue

Gender only exists to those who believe. A bit like God only exists to those who believe.

Greyskybluesky · 28/08/2025 15:37

Sammybabes16 · 28/08/2025 15:35

Why is the definition orca woman so important to you? To different people it has different meanings. In Norway and most Scandinavian countries we may have a different viewpoint to TERFs.

I cannot understand your obsession with this point. As a feminist I’m more concerned about women’s rights. In Norway it’s excellent.

If "woman" can have different meanings then you can't support "women's rights" can you?

They're just people's rights

Igneococcus · 28/08/2025 15:37

Large-scale DNA studies have found gene variants linked to gender incongruence.

Link?

Charabanc · 28/08/2025 15:37

Sammybabes16 · 28/08/2025 15:31

I’m not from Scotland so I do not know those details. I lived in Norway for many years where the have self ID. It really isn’t an issue and it had not affected our rights as women at all. Norway has been voted by the UN many times as the best country for women’s rights in the world. That’s what’s important to me not what someone wears or looks like or which bathroom they use.

Thats irrational

What is a woman?

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.