Sarah Jane Baker leads topless protest in London, and threatens named women

[ArabellaScott]

Another topless protest today.

SJB with a megaphone:

'JK Rowling - be afraid of us - Kellie Jay Keen - be afraid'
'...you will reap what you sow, and you risk encouraging and reaping the result you seem eager to provoke.'

https://x.com/GerryKeogh_/status/1926622168000983489

Also laughing out loud at the "give us a voice" sign. Trans people have been given time over and over and over again to say their pieces. For a lot of that time their voices were totally unopposed due to silencing of women and they still couldn't get what they wanted. When are they going to face up to the fact that it's not that people haven't heard and understood them, it's that we disagree with them.

Topless protesting is a French thing, only they're real women, and they make an impact not a spectacle.

The TiM's can't come up with anything original, they steal our spaces and our idea's, but they're still not women.

It's the dog I feel sorry for, animal cruelty for sure.

Not really selling us the whole 'trans women are safe to share with women' with the whole 'let us in or we will batter you' message

"We're going to keep using your spaces"

"Please don't. We're afraid, because essentially you are, well, men. And we have a right to spaces away from men. Because of how men are".

"How dare you assert your right to spaces away from us. Be afraid!"

"Er yeah dudes, that was kind of the point?"

I hope so.

This person is now directly naming women. Not just threatening to punch terfs in the face.

Considering this person is also usually protesting where KJK is holding Let Women Speak events, surely the police and the CPS have to act.

Do these police officers not engage their brain before doing this?

One of the things that must surprise everyone is that this “vulnerable tiny minority” is able to do this protest without being harmed in any way.

If they really were this vulnerable tiny minority, then they would have been physically attacked or come to some harm.

But no… they were not which is really great news.

HE (Alan Baker now known as Sarah Jane Baker) “was convicted in 1989 of tortured and sexually assaulted a teenager for 24 hours straight, then bound him in electrical wire and left him to die.”

HE now parades around with his manboobs on display threatening people to be afraid. Maybe Alan and his pals should display their genitalia instead to get their point across and with a bit of luck they would be arrested.

Oh wait, we live in a society where we release criminals early because there’s no room at the inn! Alan and his sort know they can get away with their revolting behaviour.

Just keeping filing away all the proof that the behaviour as a reason why saying no to men is dangerous for women.

Can they be arrested for indecency- if they are not female? Genuine question I don’t know.

I also doubt that officer knew what was written on the sign.

Boobs don’t really work with those shoulders do they?…

A terrifying man who wants to access women’s private spaces.

IIUC, public nudity is not illegal in the UK unless it is done with intention to cause distress or alarm. Seems to me that Baker's ranting made his intent absolutely clear.

IANAL though. And, in any case, the police rarely seem to care what men do when it comes to transgenderist issues.

It’s disgusting that he is feee to do this with seemingly no consequences

Have Northumbria Police commented on that photo yet, does anyone know?

We want to hurt women, we demand access to them!

Well I expect that of this lobby, it's the usual normal muddle of social challenge, anti socia behaviour, insane entitlement and no logic or sense anywhere in sight. But a police officer?!

If I stand on the street with a pretty frame and a sign announcing intent to commit burglarly, will PC Plod come and smile with me for a selfie?

Oh gosh Whitehall, I wonder why there's a bit of an issue in the UK with VAWG and major trust issues in the police? Would you like to borrow a five year old to talk you through it?

That individual is repeatedly proving how violent men with significant offending issues and no respect for probationary rules love this bandwagon and find it very useful. How many times can they just crack on re offending in this way without meaningful consequence? Because the consequences involved obviously mean nothing to them.

It's insane isn't it. In 2025, women are confirmed to have protections in law and men and a lot of the establishment go absolutely nuts with pique and horror about it, and it's so acceptable and understandable to threaten violence to women in the street that the police actively and smilingly support it.

Clearly not. However, I do have a smidgen (sp) of sympathy for the police. They've been told to get out there and show their support for the LGBTQ++ community as a PR exercise. They know Pride events nowadays are packed with people dressed up in ways that a few years ago were socially unacceptable but now people treat these open signs of fetishes and sexual disinhibition (nothing to do with gay rights, plenty of participants are not gay) as something to be celebrated and not kept away from children - thinking of various pictures over the last few years showing children and police officers with a scantily dressed adult pretending to be a dog on another adult's lead, for example. Safeguarding and common sense have gone out of the window. We know that many police forces have paid for their officers to go through equalities and diversity training delivered by organisations that have taught Stonewall law, not the real law, and have focussed disproportionately on gender identity and sexuality at the expense of the other protected characteristics. Police officers have been told that colleagues who identify as women can carry out strip searches of women and suspected criminals who identify as women can insist on being searched by a female officer. Criminals who are obviously male are being sent to female prisons and their crimes are being recorded as committed by a female, including rape, a crime which in English law can only be committed by a male. Police officers have been sent to arrest people who've attempted to object to all of this and the police officers have been told and have agreed that these are hateful bigots. This has included a young lad on the autistic spectrum who 'misgendered' a police officer and now has a criminal record as a result.

Small wonder that this hapless chap has failed to grasp that it really isn't 'anything goes' when it comes to ignoring what the signs at Pride say, or shouldn't be, when they are threatening violence against protected groups or named individuals. He has probably closed his mind to all his doubts and niggles about this in the hope of avoiding getting into trouble. Unfortunately for him, he's now going to be in worse trouble. Not a good sign in a police officer to lack basic common sense, but unfortunately in recent years that's been actively discouraged in this area.

This progressive messsage is now explicitly that public threats of violence is ok when it's a man understandably miffed about the law threatening to interrupt his offending. And the issue is not him, it's the law, which should not inconveniently protect women from men with very serious problems, including major sex offenses. And the women who provoke him with unacceptable words such as 'no'.

I believe Baker performed an orchiectomy on himself @NatFatPrat. One can only wonder at his state of mind.

If Baker is hauled up in front of the court I only hope he gets a different judge from the previous 'punch a terf' incident, who let him off with a slap on the wrist. Judge Tan Ikram, I believe it was.

I’m imagining it’s eventually going to escalate to genitals with some of these men.

Can't wait to share a female only space with him

Have either JKR or KJK commented on this? A police report will have more weight from them.

It's not clear how this advances the argument that women don't need single sex spaces.

It also does rather demonstrate that a man with breast implants still just looks like a man with breast implants.

They don't seem to have thought this through.