A THREAD TO RECORD ALL THE APOLOGIES TO GC WOMEN SINCE THE SUPREME COURT RULING

[MarieDeGournay]

Don't all rush at once!🙄

Here’s the reply I had from Ocado on asking to delete my account

Thanks for reaching out to us.

“These comments are not representative of us as a company, and we believe they were made by a temporary contractor who is no longer with the business. We apologise unreservedly to Mumsnet.

In the meantime, if you have any other questions, please get in touch.

Otherwise, I hope you have a lovely day. Take care!”

I saw that, disappointing.

@PersephoneSmith an offence under the the Malicious Communications Act 1988 and harassment. You could report to the police if you wished.

I wonder why the fragrant McCloud, V was not permitted to make their,
"I've always used the ladies, therefore, it's all fine for me and my cohort to continue," presentation.

I think the McCloud intervention was deemed "feelz" rather than facts of law.

Absolutely. I misunderstood your comment.
Ive learned something new today.
The Peter Daly thread deals with your query.
1 of the 2 individuals who applied lives in Ireland so is out of jurisdiction.
the 2nd had to show that they represented a group of people who were putting forward points not already covered by Scotgov or Amnesty and demonstrate prejudice as a result.
Clearly they didn’t manage to do that.

What do you think was missing from the Scotgov and Amnesty points?
Why didn’t any of the 78 LGBTQ+ groups or organisations who commented on the GRR originally apply to comment? None?!

On point.