Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

NHS Fife tries to silence nurse - Sandie Peggie vs NHS Fife Health Board and Dr Beth Upton - thread #19

1000 replies

nauticant · 14/02/2025 18:06

Sandie Peggie, a nurse at Victoria Hospital in Kirkcaldy (VH), has brought claims in the employment tribunal against her employer; Fife Health Board (the Board) and another employee, Dr B Upton. Ms Peggie’s claims are of sexual harassment, harassment related to a protected belief, indirect discrimination and victimisation. Dr Upton claims to be a transwoman, that is observed as male at birth but asserting a female gender identity.

The Employment Tribunal hearing started on Monday 3 February 2025 and was expected to continue for 2 weeks. However, after 2 weeks it was not complete and it adjourned part-heard. It seems that it will resume on 16 July and the last day of evidence will be 28 July but it wasn't completely clear whether it might end a day or two later.

The hearing commenced with Sandie Peggie giving evidence. Dr Beth Upton gave evidence from Thursday 6 February to Wednesday 12 February.

Access to view the hearing remotely was obtainable by sending an email request to [email protected] headed Public Access Request (Peggie v Fife Health Board) 4104864/2024 and requesting access.

However, as a result of problems with the livestreaming, apparently caused by a very large number of observers, remote public access to the hearing was suspended on Tuesday 11 February. It was suggested that it might be reinstated at some point but don't count on it.

The hearing is being live tweeted by https://x.com/tribunaltweets and there's additional information here: https://tribunaltweets.substack.com/p/peggie-vs-fife-health-board-and-dr. This also has threadreaderapp archives of live-tweeting of the sessions of the hearing for those who can't follow on Twitter, for example: archive.is/xkSxy.

An alternative to Twitter is to use Nitter: https://nitter.poast.org/tribunaltweets

Thread 1: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5186317-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse
Thread 2: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5267591-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-thread-2
Thread 3: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5268347-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-3
Thread 4: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5268942-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-4
Thread 5: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5269149-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-5
Thread 6: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5269635-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-6
Thread 7: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5270365-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-7
Thread 8: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5271511-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-8
Thread 9: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5271596-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-9
Thread 10: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5271723-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-10
Thread 11: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5272046-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-11
Thread 12: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5272276-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-12
Thread 13: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5272398-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-13
Thread 14: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5272939-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-14
Thread 15: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5273119-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-15
Thread 16: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5273636-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-16
Thread 17: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5273827-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-17
Thread 18: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5274332-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-18

OP posts:
Thread gallery
15
nauticant · 15/02/2025 12:11

nauticant · 14/02/2025 18:08

A request to make to people reading the thread. We've seen what a nightmare this has been for Sandie, and what a gruelling and uncertain experience it is to go through an Employment Tribunal. It would be even harder going through it and worrying about how to fund it.

Other women are going through similar experiences and need our support, so at least they're able to focus on the important parts and not worry all the time about funding. One woman going through this is Sarah Holman who is crowdfunding under Harassed and Victimised for supporting Women’s Rights. It's possible she's unaware of the support offered by Mumsnet and it would be great if she could receive some.

In case people want further information, here's Sarah's Twitter account:

x.com/sartay2001

OP posts:
RedToothBrush · 15/02/2025 12:13

GetDressedYouMerryGentlemen · 15/02/2025 11:50

Trying to keep up while also working and having other 'stuff' that couldn't be ignored completely for the duration I have missed chunks.
In my head the chromosome CR conversion that appears to be SPs major crime probably when something like this

SP: urm this is the women's CR could you leave please

DrU: I am a woman

SP: it's for females

DrU: I am a female

SP: Biological females

DrU: well you see I'm not a robot and I am female (coz I sez so) so I am a biological female.

SP: an actual woman urrmmm you know with XX chromosomes, do you have XX chromosomes?

DrU: how very dare you? I'm off to tell teacher.

Is this a fairly accurate assumption of how it happened?
If not can anyone give me a rough time of when both SP and DU gave their versions so I can check them out on TT.

Edited

What is a man?

A man is masculine and wears trousers and conforms to masculine stereotypes.

What is a woman?

A woman is a non-man. The other. Therefore if you are not a man you are by default a woman as a woman has no identity and defining features apart from 'other than man'. Women are not autonomous. They are owned by men for the use of men. They do not have enough value in their own right to be anything of their own.

Therefore if Dr Upton does not feel masculine and he is not a robot, he therefore must be a woman.

That is the sum total of this logic.

And if you can't see how much this reeks of sexism then really, I can't actually help you to see it.

WellIwasaGiraffeonce · 15/02/2025 12:13

fanOfBen · 15/02/2025 11:59

I think even if some proof suddenly turned up that SP definitely had harassed Upton in the CR, Fife would still be in the drink because of the way they handled the investigation, so what happened may not actually be that important now.

Is that what harassment can now be construed as? A woman stating effectively to a transvestite get the feck out of my changing room, I want privacy as I am entitled to?

"I have never been spoken to like that in my life."

Which life? Your life for 28 years when you dressed like a man, or your life for 2 years when you have dressed like a woman?

Tell me, would the Dr use the womens toilets in Glasgow where the response would have been that he would have been terfed out on his ear by both ladies and gentlemen?

prh47bridge · 15/02/2025 12:16

Scout2016 · 15/02/2025 11:01

Does a forensic search show up deleted things? I know sometimes deleted things can get retrieved on a computer but not sure about a phone.

Yes.

Mobile phone operating systems work the same way as computers, and files are stored using the same SSD technology that is increasingly used on computers to replace magnetic hard drives. When you delete a file, it is simply marked as deleted. It isn't erased. The contents are still there (at least for a while) and can be recovered with appropriate tools.

Newtt · 15/02/2025 12:17

WellIwasaGiraffeonce · 15/02/2025 12:05

I don't know why NC didn't press this point. Bringing things back to reality as she so deftly did on the clothes point, the Dr is a man in woman's clothing. No surgery, no GRC to even simulate being a woman.
I was fearful of getting censured on this point, but he is a Transvestite by definition - the point is well made by others, but Transgenderism is nothing but a shield for bullying and imposing terms and language to justify the opposing sides delusions.
Personally I am not opposed to androgyny, but as soon as it extends to psychotic delusion, misrepresentation and endangering women, then it is time to speak out.

I wondered this.

DU is basically 'a man in a dress' at this moment in time.

No GRC (if thats applicable in Scotland) etc

GetDressedYouMerryGentlemen · 15/02/2025 12:19

Newtt · 15/02/2025 12:17

I wondered this.

DU is basically 'a man in a dress' at this moment in time.

No GRC (if thats applicable in Scotland) etc

I wondered if it was deliberately avoided to prevent a judgement that keeps pre GRC men out but lets GRC men in?

ThatsNotMyTeen · 15/02/2025 12:20

WellIwasaGiraffeonce · 15/02/2025 12:05

I don't know why NC didn't press this point. Bringing things back to reality as she so deftly did on the clothes point, the Dr is a man in woman's clothing. No surgery, no GRC to even simulate being a woman.
I was fearful of getting censured on this point, but he is a Transvestite by definition - the point is well made by others, but Transgenderism is nothing but a shield for bullying and imposing terms and language to justify the opposing sides delusions.
Personally I am not opposed to androgyny, but as soon as it extends to psychotic delusion, misrepresentation and endangering women, then it is time to speak out.

She probably will raise this in her submissions after the evidence

NotAGentleReminder · 15/02/2025 12:20

Handbook to NHS Constitution (this is for England, I haven't seen the Scotland equivalent)
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/supplements-to-the-nhs-constitution-for-england/the-handbook-to-the-nhs-constitution-for-england#patients-and-the-public-your-rights-and-the-nhs-pledges-to-you

Single-sex sleeping accommodation is a pledge rather than a patient right. No mention of same sex doctor for intimate examination.

NotAGentleReminder · 15/02/2025 12:23

"I have never been spoken to like that in my life."
Which life? Your life for 28 years when you dressed like a man, or your life for 2 years when you have dressed like a woman?

I suspect the latter and that this is the 'Beth' persona speaking.

Anonymouse27 · 15/02/2025 12:24

Thank you. Yes that’s what I saw too. I will see if there’s a way to look at earlier versions and to see if it was always like that or if/when it changed.

Violetparis · 15/02/2025 12:24

SerafinasGoose · 15/02/2025 10:32

The thread has moved far on from this post - I'm following but missing large sections owing to the speed of the threads - but this got me thinking. Predictably, ED adopted the time-honoured TRA measure of 'aligning' feminist views with the so-called 'alt right'. This is such a lazy, uncritical regurgitation of lobby-group propaganda.

The US voted for Trump. The US wanted what he had to offer. There's a clear swing toward Reform in the UK. There's a discernible move toward right-wing views amongst younger people - working-class males in particular. As a society we ignore this at our peril, because this is the way the far right have historically come to power - through legitimate means, enabled by a disgruntled populace.

The 'Left' (which doesn't much resemble the left anymore but that's another thread) has walked right into this. If you shout down even the mildest of dissent as 'bigotry', start firing people, suspending people, harrassing and threatening them in their workplace a la Kathleen Stock, intimidate them outside their own homes as per JKR, then sooner or later people will rebel.

TRAs are not paying attention to their Overlords, Marx and Foucault. You can't keep people down like this for an indefinite period of time by merely oppressing them. You have to make them want to comply with what society is offering them, or sooner or later they will rebel. Then there'll be a revolution. The despots will be overthrown. Simple dialectics, and this one's coming to fruition right now.

Into this explosive mix walks Sandie Peggie. Of course she's going to agree with this particular stance of Trump's, because in a rare twist of fate it benefits women, who have long been pissed off and angry that their rights have been trampled over by this aggressive lobby.

IMO what we saw yesterday was an effective piece of lawyering. The motive for victimising Peggie has now been established and the hostility to her revealed. In any event, Trump is a clear red herring. UK citizens can't be 'supporters' of Trump, because Trump has no political jurisdiction in the UK, and we have no vote in the US.

As ever, with the TRA lobby (which ED is quoting to the letter whether or not she's a member), it's all wind and hot air.

Excellent post. I have always considered myself to be a lefty, liberal type but I'm furious with left/liberal politicians and their nonsense on gender ideology which is pushing people away. The gender idealogues are enabling this and I despise them for it.

Thelnebriati · 15/02/2025 12:24

Single-sex sleeping accommodation is a pledge rather than a patient right.

Which is odd because until recently when militant activists infiltrated the NHS, hospitals could be fined for putting you in mixed sex accommodation.

www.theguardian.com/society/2011/jan/20/hospitals-face-fines-mixed-sex-wards

thenosiesttermagant · 15/02/2025 12:29

NotAGentleReminder · 15/02/2025 11:34

Re the GMC and intimate examinations - I checked their guidance. When I trained, it was an expectation that some women would understandably only want a female doctor to carry out an intimate examination and this would be a perfectly reasonable request. It was also acknowledged that a female doctor might not always be available and if a male doctor had to go ahead and do the examination (obviously the woman could refuse and if the examination was immediately medically necessary and should not be delayed until a female doctor available, refusal to consent would have to be carefully documented) then a female chaperone should be present for the examination. Male doctors were advised to have a female chaperone present even if the patient said she wasn't bothered about having one.
Anyway, the current GMC guidance on intimate examinations and chaperones says nothing about the sex of the patient, doctor or chaperone. I looked through my paper copies of GMC 'Good Medical Practice' from when I graduated (20ish years ago) and could not find anything in there about it.
www.gmc-uk.org/professional-standards/the-professional-standards/intimate-examinations-and-chaperones/intimate-examinations-and-chaperones

This is shocking - and discriminatory. It discriminates on the grounds of disability and religion at least.

Theeyeballsinthesky · 15/02/2025 12:29

WellIwasaGiraffeonce · 15/02/2025 12:13

Is that what harassment can now be construed as? A woman stating effectively to a transvestite get the feck out of my changing room, I want privacy as I am entitled to?

"I have never been spoken to like that in my life."

Which life? Your life for 28 years when you dressed like a man, or your life for 2 years when you have dressed like a woman?

Tell me, would the Dr use the womens toilets in Glasgow where the response would have been that he would have been terfed out on his ear by both ladies and gentlemen?

if Dr Upton really was a woman (which he isn’t) he’d know that being “spoken to like that” is an everyday experience for women

thenosiesttermagant · 15/02/2025 12:31

If the GMC won't even open an investigation about a doctor's statement he thinks patient consent is unnecessary, could there not be a legal case against them for discrimination / failure of care to patients?

eatfigs · 15/02/2025 12:32

Justme56 · 15/02/2025 12:07

This is brilliant, thanks for posting it!

NotMaroonButRaspberry · 15/02/2025 12:34

Interesting article on the Grauniad today.

www.theguardian.com/books/2025/feb/15/cancel-culture-we-should-stop-it-end-of-story-chimamanda-ngozi-adichie-on-backlash-writers-block-and-her-two-new-babies

Partly relevant because it discusses Adichie's experience of cancel culture for saying, "trans women are trans women." (Instead of the approved and expected TWAW). She makes a very salient point for this case,

"It’s about the way the world treats us, and I think if you’ve lived in the world as a man with the privileges that the world accords to men and then sort of change gender, it’s difficult for me to accept that then we can equate your experience with the experience of a woman who has lived from the beginning as a woman and who has not been accorded those privileges that men are.”

But, less obviously immediately relevant but food for thought is her discussing a real life woman she has based a fictional character on, and how her court case against a powerful man for alleged rape fell apart when she was discovered not to be who they thought she was, (I don't know the detail)

"The message it was sending to women claiming they have been sexually abused is: you’d better be perfect. You’d better be utterly sinless. You’d better be an angel if you expect to get justice. It’s not just about that character. It’s also about all the women who, because of the circumstances of their lives, are powerless.”

The bringing in of Sandy's possible political views, her husband's FB posts, describing her as stern, the insinuation she put herself in the line of fire and could have avoided everything, that she was tricky for not accepting a change of workplace/shift pattern without complaint, that she was, gasp, ANGRY, when being unfairly suspended.....

DontStopMe · 15/02/2025 12:35

Interesting about the consent question. I was asked just the other day by a female radiologist if I was happy for the examination to take place with only the two of us in the room. I've never been asked this before.

borntobequiet · 15/02/2025 12:35

Well goodness me. Have they even looked at what their role actually is? (My italics).

Our role
The General Medical Council (GMC) is an independent organisation that helps to protect patients and improve medical education and practice across the UK.
⚫ We decide which doctors are qualified to work here and we oversee UK medical education and training. There are over 370,000 doctors on the UK medical register.
We check every doctor's identity, qualifications, knowledge, skills, experience, and English language competence before they can join the register. We also check with others, such as the doctor's medical school or previous employers, to find out if they have any concerns about the doctor's ability to practise safely, for example inappropriate behaviour, serious health problems, or performance.
We set the professional standards that doctors need to follow, and make sure that they continue to meet these standards throughout their careers.
We take action to prevent a doctor from putting the safety of patients, or the public's confidence in doctors, at risk.

Peregrina · 15/02/2025 12:36

I am wondering how they will enforce the 1992 H & S legislation to provide single sex changing facilities, when a man insists he is a woman, and with a GRC has a new birth certificate to say that he is.

Apocalypselastyear · 15/02/2025 12:36

Placemarking x

duc748 · 15/02/2025 12:41

Whenever anyone squawks, "I have never been spoken to like that in my life.", I always think, "Nah..." 😀

Sortumn · 15/02/2025 12:41

Something is troubling me about ED so glibly repeating the claim of BU about SP comparing him to Isla Bryson.
BU's own testimony admits this was an assumption on his part.
At some point in Fife's process SP must have had to give some sort of statement about how the CR interaction proceeded? This must have been documented. Surely by the time it gets to tribunal ED must have had sight of this and know that there's a discrepancy there. How can she repeat DU's claim with such confidence?

Waitwhat23 · 15/02/2025 12:51

Thelnebriati · 15/02/2025 12:24

Single-sex sleeping accommodation is a pledge rather than a patient right.

Which is odd because until recently when militant activists infiltrated the NHS, hospitals could be fined for putting you in mixed sex accommodation.

www.theguardian.com/society/2011/jan/20/hospitals-face-fines-mixed-sex-wards

The £250 fine for breaches was dropped due to Covid 19 pressures but I can't find anything to say it's been reinstated in the meantime.

Boiledbeetle · 15/02/2025 12:51

mrshoho · 15/02/2025 11:30

Ah but back in the 70's tv had 3 channels and only a few hours of kids tv. Don't you remember being off sick watching Rainbows and then straight on to Crown Court. How did we survive!

Are you sitting comfortably? Then I'll begin...

We didn't even have a tele (or a phone).

I was very much a Listen with Mother on the radio child.

We did get a tele whilst Rainbow was still on, but I'd probably aged out of it's target age range by then. So I'd struggle to name the characters or what they were.

I feel like I missed out on an essential part of childhood!

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.