Another GC employment tribunal. Adam's vs Edinburgh Rape Crsis

[Rainbowshit]

x.com/tribunaltweets/status/1746830866020442400?s=46&t=AjtjSItRj-kgZwRzL-pdyQ

Claiming constructive dismissal for GC beliefs.

ERC CEO is a well known transwoman know for controversial "reframe your trauma" remarks.

It’s like she’s been sniffing glue. All this pretence they don’t understand the question.

The last thing anyone involved in the case of a rape victim should do is lie to them. Truth is very very important, and what ERCC are doing is horrific in the name of trans inclusion!

How can someone make an informed decision if they are lied to

But isn't what she's saying just supporting RA's position. I thought ERCC's whole position was RA couldn't share the basic info on sex.

Yes! Saying they can make an informed decision requires them to be told the truth

trying to make sense of is this

1. outsource thinking, you will be told what to think by the experts and download unthinkingly to repeat as instructed (which seems to fit)

2. quite staggeringly not bright

3. desperation to fudge bloody awful can she's been left to carry largely because of 1.

Witness - I believe candid information is shared with service users but we can't share gender or medical history.
NC- But that's just telling them how they currently identify.

She's basically saying the same thing as RA was asking about and was told she had committed misconduct over.

They can't bloody select their counsellor if they don't know their sex ahead of time.

I don't feel sorry for her, but it is hard to defend her ideology, because it is callous and nonsensical.

Breaking for lunch until 2pm. See you in thread two

I have zero sympathy. They would have had the responsibilities of the role set out clearly. Key point of being a Board member is that you are there to question and hold to account, not just go along with any old shit the org wants to do.

I hope NC goes away and comes back with a killer question on this.

Along the lines of if the service user does not know sex ahead of time you risk retraumatising them and breaking their trust. They cannot make a decision with informed consent. You know they think male means XY chromosomes, not gender. So you're lying saying the centre doesn't employ any men because it does the CEO.

I wonder if that dawned on her as she answered the question with that response?

Why didn't the external Lawyers tell her when she sought advice, or were they too busy making admin errors?

Her pants are on fire for sure. Telling lies to women who have been raped FFS, how low can you go?

We don't employ men. The one without a GRC is defo a woman. Honest.🙄

MrIdul's passport and driving licence, if there is one, will say 'female' 😡

Thanks for all the posts.

Anyone else getting KM and support dog vibes (Allison Bailey's tribunal) when KM was effectively blamed for a fair amount by SW who had recruited KM to that position?

Telling lies to women who have been raped FFS, how low can you go?

I wonder how people reconcile their conscience and moral compass with this. In the same way as prison personnel are expected to lie to/gaslight women who think they're in single sex prisons and have no means of escaping their environment?

And yet women keep volunteering as eager little flying monkeys for these guys

And the hospital who told a woman she could not have been raped there because no men were there.

Allison Bailey's tribunal, KM, and the support dog (for anyone who thinks this is hyperbole or fiction).

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10804559/Stonewall-tribunal-paused-witness-support-dog-evidence-against-Allison-Bailey.html

Mridul Wadhwa's wikipedia entry continues to be one sided, with pages on supposed harassment but nothing on their abuse of trauma victims. The page is rewritten by TRAs every time anyone adds any critical information, it is truly biased and misrepresentative - as well as being the first thing people see when they google the name. If you can spare time to edit the page and keep it edited please do - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MridulWadhwa

Is this being covered in national press?

It has had some press coverage and Twitter blew up

Second thread is here

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4988632-another-gc-employment-tribunal-roz-adams-vs-edinburgh-rape-crisis-centre-2

Anyone able to explain who is suing who? And the basic argument? Thanks from GC WOMAN

See OP in thread 4.

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4991883-another-gc-employment-tribunal-roz-adams-vs-edinburgh-rape-crisis-centre-4?utm_campaign=thread&utm_medium=share&utm_source=copylink