Brilliant piece, as usual from her!
I'm glad she included this, "Besides, the Scottish government itself doesn’t see a gender recognition certificate (GRC) as “a bit of admin”. It argued in the Court of Session that a GRC makes a male person female in all circumstances, even the few, vital single-sex exemptions laid out in the Equality Act — and the judge Lady Haldane agreed. In Scotland now, legal sex always trumps biological sex."
This ruling needs to be highlighted in every discussion about the situation re Equality Act's application across the UK and the Scottish self-ID GRCs. The fact that Scotland now has a different legal definition of what a woman is, is hugely significant. When the SNP say that single-sex spaces will remain, for example, and not impact the Equality Act - ie "it's just admin" - it's not merely that a GRC is easier to obtain, it's that there is no legal distinction allowed at all based on biology, unlike in England. This is being exploited by the likes of Starmer (and others).
The journalists who have now started asking proper questions in the trans and women's rights arenas, need to get in top of this quickly. It should be used to ask every question-dodging interviewee which definition of women it is they're applying to their argument.