So, a woman from another country who has been pushed to hire security practically overnight after being at an event where activists were actively violent, spitting, literally screaming, and mobbing, is being held to account to make sure that the security firm she uses has only acceptable people for her detractors in it. (who knows by the way how many firms were approached? did this one offer?)
Is this like the 'that person writes for [insert hated media outlet]'? When no other media outlets will publish an article. You do realise this is just another form of silencing voices that you disagree with and an attempt to discredit them.
You really are determined to bring out all the tropisms, aren't you?
How about you address exactly what these women speaking said. Let's discuss that.
All you are doing is adding to the list of ways a group of people who pride themselves on inclusivity and tolerance are the exact opposite. Are you sure you are not a plant trying to make arguments to show this? Because you are doing a great job.