It is a sight to see the pivots and twists that they go through. So after admitting that despite the constant assertion of being ‘platformed’ with a Holocaust denier that there is no evidence, that person, one who posted about their profession of 25 years on a thread they started, then posts they believe wiki and biased media without ever verifying (seriously, my teen has been taught at school to never do that!!!).
Then, armed with the miniscule bit of information - that KJK has a theology degree, writes that she must be an evangelical type of Christian or even just Christian because they used a slur. When she clearly has stated numerous times that she is an atheist.
Then it becomes about her lack of a ‘career’! And more about her ‘handlers’ being the driving force- her just being a puppet. Seriously getting into misogynistic territory here!
Then it became about her looks and her charisma! How fucking misogynistic could that then get.
I did love the attempt to plant a seed of doubt with painting her as an extremist, and one who might switch sides!
That progression was such a great live demonstration by someone who seems to live in a carefully curated bubble and seems to believe only the ‘safe’ sources.
Yet those ‘safe’ sources are some of the least trustworthy in the country’s media and they publish clickbait articles bordering on propaganda, and get away with it because they are ‘opinion’ pieces and not investigative journalism.
And it is also a great demonstration of how Wikipedia has long been the domain for attracting particular interest groups as ‘editors’ around some topics. Groups not interested in balanced views or even simply stating facts.
I am sure that readers picked up the inconsistencies. The absolute pedantic mess over a widely used term, to the constant, doubling down using ‘platformed with a Holocaust denier’ with no evidence at all.
There is a particular personality type of people who do this.
Either way, I doubt any poster or reader is left thinking ELO is posting in good faith.