Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Allison Bailey v Stonewall - Employment Tribunal hearing Thread 14

1000 replies

ickky · 25/05/2022 16:40

The Tribunal started on 25th April at 10am. If you would like to view online you need to send a request for access as early as possible.

Send an email to

[email protected]

The subject heading of the email request should read

“MEDIA OR PUBLIC ACCESS REQUEST – Case number 2202172/2020 - Ms A Bailey – 25th April 2022.

Then ask for the pin for the online access.

You will be contacted with instructions on how to observe the hearing.

When joining the live tribunal please choose a non inflammatory/offensive name, everyone can see it in the chat - This is a court room, please behave accordingly.

The court chat function is there for official court purposes, not for observers, please don't use it unless you have a technical issue.

On the first page underneath where you put your screen name, select the video and mic that are not crossed out (top option), this is the courts vid and mic.
On the next page select NONE on the drop down windows for vid and mic, these are your own video and mic.

You must be muted so as to not disturb the hearing.

There is also live tweeting from

twitter.com/tribunaltweets

Abbreviations:

AB: Allison Bailey, claimant
BC: Ben Cooper QC, barrister for AB
SW = Stonewall Equality Limited (respondent 1)
IO = Ijeoma Omambala QC, senior counsel - barrister for SW
RW = Robin White junior counsel to SW - assisting IO
GC = Garden Court Chambers Limited (respondent 2) (GCC would be a better abbreviation)
AH = Andrew Hochhauser QC, senior counsel - barrister for GC
JR = Jane Russell junior counsel to GC - assisting AH
RM= Rajiv Menon QC & SH = Stephanie Harrison QC (jointly respondent 3 along with all members of GC except AB)
EJ = Employment Judge Goodman hearing the case
Panel = any one of the three panel members (EJ and two lay members)

Thread 1 www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4529887-Allison-Bailey-v-Stonewall-Employment-Tribunal-hearing?

Thread 2 www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4542466-allison-bailey-v-stonewall-employment-tribunal-hearing-thread-2

Thread 3 www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4545725-allison-bailey-v-stonewall-employment-tribunal-hearing-thread-3

Thread 4 www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4546945-allison-bailey-v-stonewall-employment-tribunal-hearing-thread-4

Thread 5 www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4548160-allison-bailey-v-stonewall-employment-tribunal-hearing-thread-5

Thread 6 www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4550451-allison-bailey-v-stonewall-employment-tribunal-hearing-thread-6

Thread 7 www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4551757-allison-bailey-v-stonewall-employment-tribunal-hearing-thread-7

Thread 8 www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4552521-allison-bailey-v-stonewall-employment-tribunal-hearing-thread-8

Thread 9 www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4553181-allison-bailey-v-stonewall-employment-tribunal-hearing-thread-9

Thread 10 www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4553754-allison-bailey-v-stonewall-employment-tribunal-hearing-thread-10

Thread 11 www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4555145-allison-bailey-v-stonewall-employment-tribunal-hearing-thread-11

Thread 12 www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4555687-allison-bailey-v-stonewall-employment-tribunal-hearing-thread-12

Thread 13 www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4556235-allison-bailey-v-stonewall-employment-tribunal-hearing-thread-13

Allison Bailey - claimant (4-9, 11-13 May)

Witnesses for the claimant:

Dr Nicola Williams - Fair Play for Women (29 April)
Dr Judith Green - A Woman's Place (29 April)
Kate Barker - LGB Alliance (3 May)
Lisa-Marie Taylor - FiLiA (4 May)

Witnesses for the respondents:

Stephen Lue - barrister for GCC (3-4 May)
Zainab Al-Farabi - ex Stonewall (10 May)
Kirrin Medcalf - head of trans inclusion Stonewall (10 May)
Leslie Thomas - barrister at GCC (13 May)
Sanjay Sood Smith - Stonewall (16 May)
Shaan Knan - LGBT consortium - on STAG (16 May)
Rajiv Menon - joint head of chambers (16-17 May)
Maya Sikand - barrister at GCC (17-18 May)
Mia Hakl-Law - HR senior for GCC (18 May)
Judy Khan - barrister at GCC (19-20 May)
Charlie Tennent - clerk at GCC (20 May)
Luke Harvey - clerk at GCC (20 May)
Louise Hooper - Barrister at GCC (20 May)
Marc Willers - Barrister at GCC (23 May)
Stephen Clark - Barrister at GCC (23 May)
Liz Davies - Barrister at GCC (23 May)
Katherine McGahy - Bar Council Ethics Committee's VC (24 May)
Tom Wainwright - Barrister at GCC (24 May)
Colin Cook - clerk at GCC (24 May
David Renton - barrister at GCC (20 May, to concluded on 25th May)
David de Menezes - GCC, Head of Marketing
Kathryn Cronin - barrister at GCC

To come:

Michelle Brewer - barrister at GCC at time, now left and a judge.
Stephanie Harrison - joint head of chambers

OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
Ereshkigalangcleg · 26/05/2022 11:09

If this was a male TRA I'd assume it was a deliberate piece of gaslighting.

MythicalReasonableTwitterUser · 26/05/2022 11:09

Why doesn't BC just cut in and stop her going on?

when he finally does, AH interrupts to complain and manages to waste yet more time...

awkwardoldlady · 26/05/2022 11:09

wow - high priestess of woo indeed

tigertactics · 26/05/2022 11:09

Only some people's trauma is important apparently.

TheElementsSong · 26/05/2022 11:09

jeaux90 · 26/05/2022 11:08

Wait a second so she's now saying victims of trauma need a safe space, but women who have been raped who want a safe space away from males are transphobic. Um just wow.

Exactly! WTF?

IDidntKnowItWasAParty · 26/05/2022 11:10

Who was it who said earlier in the hearings that GCC would no longer be a safe space because women like AB might attack transwomen in the women's loos - Kirren Metcalf from Stonewall I believe....

ickky · 26/05/2022 11:10

jeaux90 · 26/05/2022 11:08

Wait a second so she's now saying victims of trauma need a safe space, but women who have been raped who want a safe space away from males are transphobic. Um just wow.

Very good point show her hypocrisy.

OP posts:
Chrysanthemum5 · 26/05/2022 11:10

So MB is a judge - would she tolerate this level of grandstanding and waffle in her cases? I think she is being very disrespectful to EJG

ifIwerenotanandroid · 26/05/2022 11:10

What on earth was the subject of the paintings?

Datun · 26/05/2022 11:10

tabbycatstripy · 26/05/2022 11:06

MB says it potentially compromised Chambers as a safe space.

BC asks whether her principal concern was AB expressing views that might upset MB's client base.

MB says that makes it sound benign. AB was expressing views that MB's traumatised clients would find disturbing and would make them unsafe.

That's just an admission of prejudice, isn't it? That's exactly what it is.

If gender critical people make trans people feel 'unsafe', then there's the discrimination.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 26/05/2022 11:10

Yes it was Kirren.

nauticant · 26/05/2022 11:10

One of the things I've learned from the past few years is that institutions, and society in general, needs to be very careful before giving influence and power to individuals who identify themselves as being activist- anything such as activist-journalists, activist-lawyers, and particularly activist-judges.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 26/05/2022 11:11

What on earth was the subject of the paintings?

Good question!

FingonTheValiant · 26/05/2022 11:11

She's so waffley I'm finding it very hard to maintain concentration. I got so distracted I started buying plants 😂

Signalbox · 26/05/2022 11:11

jeaux90 · 26/05/2022 11:08

Wait a second so she's now saying victims of trauma need a safe space, but women who have been raped who want a safe space away from males are transphobic. Um just wow.

Trans is everything for this woman.

Clymene · 26/05/2022 11:11

AB's views impact on access to justice.

She is talking about victims of serious trauma. She seems to have entirely forgotten that Allison is also a victim of serious trauma

Mmmnotsure · 26/05/2022 11:12

MB: TWs are victims of egregious violence.

Goes on to ref her work with TW refugees (?of colour). Seems to extrapolate from this comparatively small and obviously incredibly disadvantaged group to inc all TW, inc the cohort of white, middle-class, middle-age males whose experience and privilege will be vastly different, almost incomparable.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 26/05/2022 11:12

One of the things I've learned from the past few years is that institutions, and society in general, needs to be very careful before giving influence and power to individuals who identify themselves as being activist- anything such as activist-journalists, activist-lawyers, and particularly activist-judges.

I completely agree. I hope Brewer can put her personal zealotry aside when she hears a case.

TopKnotch · 26/05/2022 11:12

MB is showing herself to have a transcentric view of literally everything.

Nothing else, no one else matters.

She is very ably demonstrating the degree to which she feels justified in all of her actions, because trans

Boiledbeetle · 26/05/2022 11:13

this break I'm going for full fat full caffeine coke and a chocolate bar and a bag of jelly tots.

Give me five minutes and I will be identifying as a hyperactive five year old.

IDidntKnowItWasAParty · 26/05/2022 11:13

Refernce to paintings could be this:
"Other paintings are more poignant; one showing Mr. Punch hanging himself in a prison cell upset some."
D Grayson Exhibition, TUESDAY 29 JANUARY 2013
www.gardencourtchambers.co.uk/news/donald-grayson-exhibition

doradoo · 26/05/2022 11:13

WallaceinAnderland · 26/05/2022 11:02

MB is flagging now.

Stephanie Harrison QC is watching. I'm confused, isn't she up after MB?

Is that allowed? Aren't the witnesses meant to be kept away from the proceedings?

WinterTrees · 26/05/2022 11:13

EJG HAS to see the hypocrisy and double standards in that last little bit about safe spaces, right?? I mean, BC doesn't need to spend time pointing it out because it's writ large in neon letters, isn't it?

WookeyHole · 26/05/2022 11:13

Zeugma · 26/05/2022 11:08

Just as a matter of interest, has there ever been a modern, connected, fast-moving workplace of so many high-functioning, extremely highly-educated professional people, in the 21st century, who don’t use Twitter and don’t understand anything about it?

Tbh, my workplace might fall into this category but that's because most of my colleagues are now aged 22-28 and Twitter is for old farts, apparently.

ifIwerenotanandroid · 26/05/2022 11:14

Beautiful!

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread