Am I reading that right, that Brian Paddick is calling female-only spaces 'state-sponsored police harassment'? Segregation on prejudice? Sorry, not on Twitter but can't work out that last bit - segregation by prejudice maybe?
I wonder if he realises this free-for-all will include men's spaces too (because we will damn well make sure it does). Men's public toilets - including in the HoL - will have to become 'anybody', just as ours are becoming. No more changing rooms anywhere for men only and let's have a renewed effort against any remaining men-only clubs. Only fair for it work every which way, Brian.
I once had hopes of that man. During the last HoL debate on this (last I saw anyway) he said how at one stage he was teetering on the edge, not knowing which way to jump with trans issues. Well, he clearly decided to choose the wrong side. Not only that, but he's showing his disagreement with safeguarding generally. Women can easily prove that we are disproportionately the victims of male sexual violence so if our protections, such as they are, are revoked then also those of children should, logically, be revoked. How can he not see this? How can any of them not see this? Can you tell I have steam coming out of my ears?