Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

LangCleg

1000 replies

dragongirlx · 21/01/2020 16:37

I am a long time lurker but infrequent poster here but I needed to bring this to everyone's attention.
I have found out that Mumsnet HQ have banned the fabulous LangCleg simply for repeatedly pointing out the repeated times coercive control has been used by the moderators to stop women talking.
I understand it started with a conversation when a post was deleted because she allegedly used a sweeping generalisation but they couldn't or wouldn't confirm the generalisation and when she challenged them they decided to ban her on the basis of previous comments.

So it now seems pointing out coercive control is now grounds for being banned, thus proving that coercive control is being used.

I for one would like @MumsnetHQ to provide an explanation here as this is really not on

(also taking bets on how long before the thread is deleted)

OP posts:
Thread gallery
16
EinsteinsAthleticSausnuaryHCB · 21/01/2020 20:42

I normally lurk on this board, however just wanted to voice my support for Lang. I enjoy Lang's posts. Personally, I have found that Lang's speak a lot of sense. They cut through the crap and provide clarity.

Awful, not to mention puzzling, decision @MNHQ.

WeBuiltCisCityOnSexistRoles · 21/01/2020 20:42

It's an instinctive and tempting reaction, I think to flounce in solidarity, but this is exactly what these people want (as per those Twitter shots) - they want to silence us and like fuck will I just give in and give them what they want.

If we want to express our feelings about LangCleg's treatment we need to address it with MN, not go and discuss it elsewhere.

I am imagining us all staging a giant virtual MN sit in clutching our #RestoreLang placards and chanting. Strength in numbers. And I'm already banned from Twitter Wink

LangClegsOpinionIsNoted · 21/01/2020 20:44

Pulls up a cushion for the sit in.

AnyOldPrion · 21/01/2020 20:44

Lang, if you’re reading this, I add my best wishes. I will miss your down to earth posting and intelligent, well-informed commentary. Shocked at this decision.

Datun · 21/01/2020 20:45

Until recently I have been a school governor and Lang's posts helped me to have a better understanding of safeguarding and to do a better job of asking the right questions to keep ALL the children in the school safer. It is a huge loss to me and no doubt to other people like me.

Dear god. Compare that with:

Slowly, Gently; This is how a TERF is taken down

Bye LangCleg

Despite the post and thread, your tepid regurgitation of other people's thought's and writings that you spewed over Mumsnet TERFboard won't be missed

ta ra a bit—bab

Please HQ, Justine, open your eyes. See what this looks like. What it IS.

HairyDogsOfThigh · 21/01/2020 20:45

Just another FWR lurker popping by to register my support of Lang and disgust of MNHQ for an unjust ban.

WeBuiltCisCityOnSexistRoles · 21/01/2020 20:45

Gremlins Grin I get the feeling we are all The Evil Nasty Gremlins, not Gizmo!

Shall we all eat after midnight, then have a bath and reconvene here in our millions tomorrow?

OnlyTheTitOfTheLangBerg · 21/01/2020 20:46

So this has encouraged dozens of lurkers to post in FWR for the first time (Flowers hello, welcome, please stay, just don't ask me to explain the rules) and several women to also sign up to another space where we can talk freely and continue to learn from Lang's knowledge of safeguarding. Good job on that shutting down women's freedom of speech, monitors

VivaLeBeaver · 21/01/2020 20:47

Seeing as MN banned Stratters for very dubious reasons I am no longer surprised by anything they do. Seems of you’re vocal in complaining against them after a while they sling you out.

Laniakea · 21/01/2020 20:47

"Parenting website bans child safeguarding expert to appease men who want safeguarding measures relaxed for their own ends"

Utterly insane. Shameful.

BickerinBrattle · 21/01/2020 20:49

Possibly also to appease a male moderator.

forkfun · 21/01/2020 20:49

I've only recently become aware of many of the issues discussed on this board. LangCleg helped me understand a great deal. Not going anywhere now.

pombear · 21/01/2020 20:51

WeBuiltCis fluffy on the outside, just don't feed us shit after midnight! (Well, to be honest, at any time of the day when it conflicts with women's rights and children's health and safety!)

LoafEater · 21/01/2020 20:54

well MNHQ, you really let yourself get played didnt you?

HirooOnoda · 21/01/2020 20:54

@pombear - almost, I prefer to view Hiroo as a character that refused to stop fighting for the cause believed in, refusing to accept what was heard through lines of perceived disingenuous communication. This rang true to me when I first heard the story and still does, suspect refusing to accept what we are told, contrary to our beliefs is likely what unites us and brings us to a forum such as this.

As for shutting down any debate, quite the opposite really. I happened to agree with much of what Lang had to say, both interesting, informative and always thought provoking. That said, if we cannot continue such debate within certain boundaries then our arguments are delegitimised and this doesn’t do a great deal to further our cause.

I doubt mumsnet would want to lose a poster such as Lang and I would love to know more about why this disagreement couldn’t be resolved in a more constructive way

LassoOfTruth · 21/01/2020 20:55

Shocking decision. I thought this was a place for respectful debate, and I always found LangCleg respectful, balanced, clear and thoughtful. Not on MNHQ!

BuzzShitbagBobbly · 21/01/2020 20:55

Fucksake.

Just fucking fuck of fucked up fuckness.

Another Lang fan here.

Duchessofealing · 21/01/2020 20:57

Delurking to add a voice of support. And joined spinster.

BiologyIsReal · 21/01/2020 20:57

And this at a time when we have never needed people who speak truth to power more.

A cowardly decision.

SapphosRock · 21/01/2020 20:58

Wow. Was only on a thread with Lang this morning. We didn't always see eye to eye but she didn't deserve this.

TheBadorablesLangCleg · 21/01/2020 20:59

I doubt mumsnet would want to lose a poster such as Lang and I would love to know more about why this disagreement couldn’t be resolved in a more constructive way
Having already posted your speculative personal attack on her character I don't think that will sell.

BeUpStanding · 21/01/2020 20:59

What on earth were you thinking banning Langcleg @MNHQ?! She's the clearest and most comprehensive voice speaking about safeguarding on MUMSNET. Madness, absolute madness.

StealthPolarBear · 21/01/2020 21:00

Thanks Oncewasblueandyellowtwo although I wish I hadn't asked, should have known it would raise my blood pressure

TheRattleCleg · 21/01/2020 21:00

I'm another one going to check out Spinster.

But I'm sticking around here too, 'cos I'm bloody-minded like that Grin

TheBadorablesLangCleg · 21/01/2020 21:02

What on earth were you thinking banning Langcleg @MNHQ?! She's the clearest and most comprehensive voice speaking about safeguarding on MUMSNET.
The answer is in the question. Safeguarding appears to be a forbidden topic on FWR. Perhaps site wide. Time will tell as more an more people become aware of the issues.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.