Boasting that your vexatious litigation has cost your victim a small fortune before you dropped it is the clear mark of a snivelling little shit.
I know right. I think Stephanie is going on about the money because they think that it will somehow make it look like Graham is actually guilty of something. The 'tweets cost 28 grand', well yes, only because of you Stephanie. In no objective world had Graham done anything wrong at all. In no objective world should those tweets have cost 28 grand.
The case was dropped. There is nothing to persue here. So Stephanie is basically boasting that they caused someone who had done nothing wrong, to have to spend 28 thousand pounds totally uneccessarily. It's not a great look is it?
It's weird, I have never been subject to abuse, gaslighting or manipulation by a man or partner in real life. I have a great husband and family. I can't even really imagine being treated that way, I'm very lucky in that respect. But I see it so much of it by TRAs, it makes me realise how it can so easily happen, and that the people who do it literally don't give a fuck, and will press on forward with it even when the whole world can see it for what it is. Because the narcissism and the need to be abusive is that strong.
And Stephanie Hayden is one of the absolute worst for it.